Palm Beach County state attorney
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ECRWRF
|
Utility contributor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barry Krischer
|
Leader organization |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07-19 | N/A | Scheduled date for Grand Jury to convene to hear the Epstein case. | Unknown | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Two year investigation by the State Attorney. | Florida (implied) | View |
EFTA00015151.pdf
This document is a 'Delayed Response' from the FBI and NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services generated on October 6, 2021, regarding a criminal history inquiry (III search). It pertains to a subject whose name is redacted but involves a 'multi-source offender record' based on information from the State of Florida. While the specific criminal history details are redacted, the document lists several contributing agencies in Florida, including the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, State Attorney's Office, and police departments in Margate and Riviera Beach.
EFTA00015140.pdf
This document is a heavily redacted criminal history record (rap sheet) generated on October 6, 2021, by the NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services for the FBI. It pertains to a single-source offender (likely Epstein or an associate) and contains Florida-specific information, including references to expunged and sealed records. A visible disposition indicates a misdemeanor conviction on January 18, 2012, and the index lists multiple law enforcement agencies in Palm Beach and Volusia County, Florida.
EFTA00014615.pdf
A legal opinion letter from attorney H. Dohn Williams Jr. to the U.S. Attorney's Office explaining the specific legal mechanisms Jeffrey Epstein used to avoid indefinite civil commitment under Florida's Jimmy Ryce Act. The author details how serving time in county jail rather than state prison was a deliberate loophole used to bypass the Act, a loophole that was closed in 2014. The letter asserts that 'money, powerful friends,' and the cooperation of the U.S. Attorney, State Attorney, and Sheriff's Office facilitated this unique arrangement.
EFTA00013766.pdf
This document contains an email chain between late 2007 involving Federal Prosecutors (US Attorney's Office) and State Prosecutors (Palm Beach County ASA) regarding the 'Epstein settlement agreement.' The correspondence highlights the coordination between state and federal offices to ensure Jeffrey Epstein's state plea and sentencing occurred before January 4, 2008, specifically to satisfy the terms of a federal non-prosecution agreement. The emails reveal logistical challenges with Judge McSorley's scheduling preferences but confirm that the settlement was a 'definite go.'
EFTA00013524.pdf
This document contains an email exchange between federal prosecutors (USAFLS) and the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office regarding the scheduling of Jeffrey Epstein's plea and sentencing in late 2007. The federal prosecutor expresses concern that a scheduled court date of January 7, 2008, conflicts with the federal non-prosecution agreement requiring Epstein to surrender by January 4, 2008, and requests the hearing be moved up. The state prosecutor confirms the settlement is proceeding but notes the judge's requirement for concurrent plea and sentencing has complicated the scheduling.
DOJ-OGR-00031408.jpg
This document is a faxed printout of a news article describing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police (Chief Reiter) and the State Attorney's office regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details the police chief's frustration with the lenient plea deal and initial indictment, the involvement of high-profile lawyers like Kenneth Starr, and Epstein's claims of anti-Semitism. The text also describes Epstein's home environment, possession of firearms (Glock), and lists several female associates including Haley Robson and Sarah Kellen.
DOJ-OGR-00031397.jpg
This document is a scanned page from The Palm Beach Post dated August 25, 2006, containing Letters to the Editor. The primary letter, written by Aileen Josephs, strongly criticizes Jeffrey Epstein and his legal team (specifically naming Jack Goldberger and Alan Dershowitz) for attacking his victims' reputations. The author asserts that 'money and power does buy justice' in Palm Beach County and argues that lack of knowledge regarding a victim's age is no defense for statutory rape. The page also contains unrelated letters regarding a local church and pension legislation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019367.jpg
An FBI clipping of a Palm Beach Post article from July 29, 2006, detailing how Alan Dershowitz, representing Jeffrey Epstein, provided the State Attorney's office with damaging information from MySpace to discredit teenage accusers. The article highlights a conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter, who wanted more serious charges, and the State Attorney's office, which secured a lesser indictment for solicitation. It also mentions intimidation tactics including private investigators following a victim's father and bribery attempts to stop witnesses from cooperating.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018920.jpg
A 2006 Palm Beach Post article detailing allegations that Alan Dershowitz provided damaging information about teenage accusers to the State Attorney's Office to defend Jeffrey Epstein. The article notes police frustration with the handling of the case, mentioning that Epstein was indicted on a single solicitation charge despite police believing there was probable cause for more serious crimes involving minors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022014.jpg
This document is a scanned excerpt, labeled Chapter 55, containing a letter written by former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta on March 20, 2011. In the letter, Acosta addresses the public regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case during his tenure (2005-2009), noting the involvement of Palm Beach Police and the State Attorney. He discusses jurisdictional issues, specifically the requirement of an 'interstate nexus' for federal crimes, and mentions Epstein's attorney, Roy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016678.jpg
A technical utility report showing 'Plant Influent Flows' (wastewater/water usage) for October 2008. It details the Million Gallons per Day (MGD) flow, reserve capacity, and percentage of capacity used for various Palm Beach municipalities (Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Riviera Beach, Lake Worth) and the County. It includes a graph tracking these flows from October 2007 through October 2008.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016583.jpg
This document contains the minutes from a Code Enforcement Board meeting on July 17, 2008, detailing a legal dispute between the Town (likely Palm Beach) and Dr. Lynn regarding his dog, Duke. The Town sought the removal or euthanasia of the dog following a June 20th incident involving Laura Klein, while Dr. Lynn's attorney, Mr. Merola, argued jurisdictional issues and compliance. Sgt. Krauel provided police testimony regarding the timeline of notices and the Town's ability to enforce stricter ordinances than the state or county.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017271.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated 2012) written by an attorney (likely Alan Dershowitz based on context) regarding the legal case of Dr. William Sybers. The text details the background of the case, where Dr. Sybers was convicted of killing his wife, Kay, with succinylcholine in 1991. It discusses the initial investigation, the suspicious circumstances involving a missing syringe and an affair, and the subsequent suicide of the couple's son, Tim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010546.jpg
This document is an excerpt from 'Chapter 55' of a larger work, containing a letter written by former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta on March 20, 2011. In the letter, Acosta addresses the public regarding his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case between 2005 and 2009, noting the involvement of the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney. The text discusses jurisdictional issues (state vs. federal), the hiring of underage females for massages, and mentions Epstein's attorney, Roy (presumably Roy Black). The right side of the page is cut off, obscuring the ends of many sentences.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010528.jpg
The document contains an excerpt from a book (Chapter 49) titled 'Jeffrey Epstein: September 2007' alongside a partial 2006 letter from Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter regarding the Epstein investigation. The book text contrasts the harsh 2013 sentencing of school principal Scott Blake for soliciting a minor with the 'extraordinary' plea deal Jeffrey Epstein received in 2007 for similar offenses. It highlights Epstein's high-powered defense team and political connections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010527.jpg
This document contains a scanned letter from Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter to the father of a victim, dated July 24, 2006. In the letter, Reiter confirms Jeffrey Epstein's recent indictment and surrender to state authorities but explicitly states his belief that justice has not been served by the state indictment alone. Consequently, Reiter informs the parent that he has referred the case to the FBI to investigate potential violations of federal law. The right side of the image contains partial text from a book or article comparing Epstein's lenient plea deal to the harsher sentencing of a school principal named Blake in 2013.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015631.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). Attorneys Edwards and Cassell argue against sealing court records, claiming that Alan Dershowitz selectively reveals confidential information to misrepresent facts while trying to prevent them from correcting the record. The text specifically cites a deposition where Dershowitz allegedly brought up an affidavit by Virginia Giuffre regarding him watching her perform oral sex on Jeffrey Epstein, and subsequently misrepresented settlement discussions involving attorney David Boies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029420.jpg
This document, part of a 2017 House Oversight filing, recounts the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how police sought serious molestation charges, but State Attorney Barry Krischer presented lesser charges to a grand jury, leading to accusations of preferential treatment. The text also highlights Epstein's high-profile connections, including Bill Clinton and Alan Dershowitz, and financial ties to Harvard and politicians like Eliot Spitzer and Bill Richardson.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021802.jpg
This 2006 New York Times article details the friction between the Palm Beach Police and the State Attorney's office regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. While police found probable cause for serious felonies including lewd molestation of minors, State Attorney Barry Krischer presented the case to a grand jury which resulted in a lesser indictment for soliciting prostitution. The article highlights accusations of preferential treatment due to Epstein's wealth and connections, noting his ties to Bill Clinton and Harvard.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021784.jpg
This document, likely a page from a news article filed in House Oversight records, summarizes the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Police Chief Reiter accused State Attorney Krischer of preferential treatment for Epstein. The text outlines Epstein's high-profile connections (Clinton, Harvard), his legal defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz, and provides specific graphic details of the allegations made by a 14-year-old victim who was recruited by Haley Robson.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021772.jpg
This document appears to be a news article or report summary detailing the 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach. It highlights the conflict between the police (who sought serious molestation charges) and the State Attorney (who pursued lesser solicitation charges), allegations of preferential treatment due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the political fallout involving returned donations. It also outlines Epstein's defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021766.jpg
This document is a reprint of a Palm Beach Post editorial dated August 10, 2006, titled 'Massaging the system.' It heavily criticizes State Attorney Barry Krischer for referring the Jeffrey Epstein case to a grand jury rather than prosecuting directly, suggesting favoritism toward the wealthy defendant. The text details police findings, including payments to minors and physical evidence (school transcripts) found in Epstein's trash that contradicted his defense claims of ignorance regarding the victims' ages.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016427.jpg
This document is page 4 of a declaration by John M. Browning, dated January 11, 2019, detailing procedural steps taken by 'the Post' regarding a motion to unseal appellate briefs. It outlines communications with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida to coordinate service of the motion. The document bears a House Oversight Committee bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016426.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal affirmation detailing procedural history regarding a motion by 'The Post' to unseal appellate briefs related to the Epstein case. It chronicles communications between the Post's legal counsel, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office (specifically Karen Friedman Agnifilo), and Epstein's counsel (Mr. Weinberg) between December 2018 and January 2019. Key points include the DA's opposition to the motion, the suggestion to notify Florida prosecutors, and Mr. Weinberg formally stating that Epstein took no position on the unsealing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030313.jpg
This document is a professional profile of Palm Beach Police Chief Reiter, detailing his career history, character, and involvement in high-profile investigations, including the deaths of David Kennedy and the case against William Kennedy Smith. It notes that following Jeffrey Epstein's indictment, Reiter referred the case to the FBI. A confidentiality notice at the end indicates the document is the property of Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity