358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida
LocationRelationship Network
017-09.pdf
This document contains a Motion for Reconsideration filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in February 2010, arguing against a Magistrate's order compelling him to produce sensitive documents. The motion relies heavily on Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination, arguing that despite a Non-Prosecution Agreement, Epstein faces real risks of prosecution in other jurisdictions. Attached exhibits include the Plaintiff's 2009 requests for production of massage logs, photos of Epstein's Palm Beach home, financial records, and medical records from Dr. Stephan Alexander, to which Epstein consistently objected.
017-02.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on October 6, 2009, opposing a Motion to Compel discovery filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2. Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to refuse the production of photographs of his Palm Beach home (specifically massage rooms), financial records, tax returns, passport/travel records, and medical records from Dr. Stephan Alexander. The defense argues that despite the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), the threat of federal prosecution remains real and substantial, particularly in districts outside the Southern District of Florida, and that the act of producing these documents would be testimonial and incriminating.
017-01.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's First Request for Production filed by Jane Doe in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff argues that Epstein's blanket invocation of Fifth Amendment privileges to refuse producing documents (such as phone records, tax returns, and correspondence) is improper and that he should be compelled to answer or provide a privilege log. The motion details specific discovery requests and Epstein's uniform response asserting his constitutional rights against self-incrimination.
043.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's First Request for Production filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON). The motion argues that Epstein has improperly asserted blanket Fifth Amendment privileges in response to sixteen specific requests for production of documents, including telephone records, appointment books, financial records, and correspondence. The Plaintiff requests the Court to order Epstein to answer the requests, provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocations, and produce a privilege log.
016.pdf
This document is a Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence filed by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 against Jeffrey Epstein in May 2009. The motion requests the court to order Epstein to preserve evidence related to allegations of sexual abuse, specifically citing evidence seized during a 2005 police search and other electronic/physical records located across his six international properties. The document lists numerous attorneys involved in related cases and references Epstein's previous guilty plea in 2008.
016-03.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida, dated May 26, 2009, granting a motion to preserve evidence in multiple civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders Epstein and his associates to preserve a wide range of materials, specifically highlighting records of domestic and international travel (including private airplanes), phone communications, financial records, and evidence related to the October 25, 2005 police search of his Palm Beach mansion. The order explicitly prohibits the destruction, alteration, or deletion of potential evidence dating back to 1998.
060.pdf
This is a Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's First Request for Production filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The motion seeks a court order requiring Epstein to answer 16 specific requests for production of documents (including telephone records, photos, tax returns, and passport copies) or to provide a privilege log, as Epstein has refused to produce documents by asserting a blanket Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The plaintiff argues that Epstein's boilerplate objections are invalid, violate local rules requiring a privilege log, and that he must provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocation for each request.
028.pdf
This document is a motion filed on May 26, 2009, by Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 requesting a court order to compel Jeffrey Epstein to preserve all evidence, including electronic data, documents, and physical items located at his six international properties. The plaintiffs argue that given Epstein's status as a sex offender and his previous attempts to reclaim seized property (which may include child pornography), there is a high risk he will destroy incriminating evidence, including flight logs ('records of domestic and international travel') and computer files. The document lists the specific types of digital and physical evidence sought and notes that Epstein's counsel had failed to respond to a previous preservation letter.
028-03.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida dated May 26, 2009, granting a motion by Plaintiffs (Jane Doe No. 101 and 102) to preserve evidence in their cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders Epstein to preserve a wide range of materials, specifically including flight logs ('travel in Defendant's private airplanes'), phone records, computer data since 1998, financial records regarding payments to victims, and evidence related to the October 25, 2005 police search of his Palm Beach mansion. The order explicitly forbids the destruction, deletion, or alteration of any such evidence.
046.pdf
This document is a legal filing from Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000's counsel requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants (Epstein's executors Indyke and Kahn) to produce discovery documents and answer interrogatories. The filing includes exhibits of the discovery requests, which seek detailed information on Epstein's flight logs, financial transactions, communications with high-profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz), and the structure of his alleged sex-trafficking operation. The Defendants have objected to almost all requests, claiming they are overbroad or that they lack knowledge because Epstein is deceased, prompting the Plaintiff to seek court intervention. Note: While flight logs are requested, no actual flight data is contained in this document.
EFTA00027591.pdf
This document is a transcript of the plea conference held on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida, for the case of State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein pleads guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution. The transcript details the terms of the plea agreement, which includes an 18-month jail sentence (12 months on one count, 6 consecutive on the other) followed by community control, sex offender registration, and a non-prosecution agreement with federal authorities.
EFTA00021944.pdf
This document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on October 18, 2021, requesting the court to preclude the introduction of Government Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313, and 606. The defense argues these items—including specific photographs, sex toys ('Twin Torpedos') seized in 2005, and a 'Household Manual'—are irrelevant, lack proper evidentiary foundation, or are unfairly prejudicial under Federal Rules of Evidence 401 and 403. The motion contends that these items do not prove any material fact regarding the charges against Maxwell and serve only to confuse issues or introduce character flaws of Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00008892.pdf
This document is a Grand Jury exhibit (GX-2) from the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case, dated June 29, 2020. It compiles evidence including photos of Epstein properties, extensive flight logs from 1994-1998 documenting travel by Epstein, Maxwell, and various associates (including 'Space', Glen Dubin, and Clair Hazell) on aircraft N908JE and N988JE. It includes correspondence regarding a $200,000 donation to Interlochen Arts Camp and transcripts from Maxwell's 2016 deposition where she denies knowledge of underage recruitment, sex toys, or giving massages.
EFTA00008716.pdf
This document is a Grand Jury Presentation from June 2020 in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It compiles evidence including photographs of Epstein's properties, flight logs from 1994-1998 showing Maxwell and others traveling with Epstein, records of a donation to Interlochen Arts Camp, and excerpts from Maxwell's 2016 deposition where she denies knowledge of underage recruitment or sexual misconduct. The flight logs notably list prominent figures such as Senator George Mitchell and Bill Richardson.
EFTA00008599.pdf
This document is a 2019 SDNY presentation containing evidence against Jeffrey Epstein from the 2004-2005 period. It includes photos of his NY and Palm Beach properties, handwritten message slips explicitly referencing 'females' and scheduling encounters, financial records of cash deposits, call logs connecting NY and Florida, and flight records for N908JE. Notable evidence includes a message slip recording a call from Donald Trump and flight manifests placing Epstein on specific trips between New York and Palm Beach.
EFTA00007859.pdf
This document consists of a Palm Beach Police Department evidence record dated June 20, 2005, for case #05-368, listing '3 Floor Plans' seized from suspect 'Epstein, Jeffery'. The subsequent pages are the actual architectural blueprints for the 'Epstein Residence' at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida, dated March and April 1994, detailing the first floor, second floor, and exterior cabana/pool areas.
DOJ-OGR-00015626.jpg
This document is a first-floor architectural plan for the 'Epstein Residence' at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida, dated September 24, 1994. Created by architects Roger Wm. Sahli and Michael J. Johnson, the drawing includes extensive handwritten notes detailing proposed renovations, such as modifying the pool, updating rooms, and ensuring compliance with FEMA regulations for certain equipment.
DOJ-OGR-00032348.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated February 17, 2006, documents an officer's assistance in executing a search warrant at Jeffrey Epstein's residence on October 20, 2005. The officer, directed by Det. Joseph Recarey, searched three locations for computer equipment: the Kitchen Staff Office, the Garden Room, and a detached Cabana room. While one CPU was found in the first room, the other two locations showed signs of recently removed computers, and no removable media storage devices were found anywhere.
DOJ-OGR-00005778.jpg
This document is a court filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 29, 2021, in which the defense objects to specific government exhibits. The defense argues that photographs (Exhibits 251 and 288, description redacted) and a box containing 'Twin Torpedos' (Exhibit 294) seized from Epstein's Palm Beach home in 2005 are irrelevant, prejudicial, and inadmissible under Federal Rules of Evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019016.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details the execution of a search warrant at Jeffrey Epstein's residence on October 20, 2005. Officer Curtis Krauel describes finding evidence of missing computer equipment in three separate locations (Kitchen Staff Office, Garden Room, and Cabana Room), noting that while monitors and peripherals remained, CPUs and media storage devices had been removed or were missing. One CPU found in the Kitchen Staff Office had its case open and contained hardware capable of recording audio and video, but was disconnected.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity