| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
|
Organizational |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc Allan Fernich
|
Professional employment ownership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Stopeck
|
Contacts for service |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Muslim Brotherhood
|
Part of governing body of |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation record access |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Interagency notification |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigation surveillance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of interest monitoring |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of investigation monitoring |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Mueller Investigation | Washington | View |
| N/A | Legal action (subpoena) | Subpoenas were issued to multiple entities connected to J. Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein, including... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Pool Maintenance by Hackl Pool Service, every Monday and Thursday, no set time. Involves putting ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Landscape Spraying by Academy Services. Alan Stopeck contacts them as necessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Tree Trimming by County Wide Tree Service, twice a year, usually in summer and winter. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Arrest of Larry Scudder. | Dubai Airport | View |
| 2021-08-26 | N/A | Capitol Police officers sue Donald Trump and extremist groups over Jan 6 riot. | Washington, DC | View |
| 2017-10-04 | N/A | Announcement of partnership to form Rockefeller Capital Management. | New York | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Florida state criminal investigation of Mr. Epstein. | Florida | View |
A photograph identifying a mechanical room or basement area, likely within Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan townhouse given the New York area code (718) visible on the fire extinguisher tag. The image shows insulated pipes labeled 'HEATING WATER SUP.' and 'HEATING WATER RET.', filing cabinets, a FedEx box, and a fire extinguisher with an inspection tag dated 2018. The image is Bates stamped EFTA00001379.
This document is a printout from Citysearch, dated December 9, 2005, showing search results related to 'Service Stations'. It lists 'A-A Auto Service Center' specializing in Land Rover service, 'Service Station Supplies from Concept' offering innovative products, and 'Service Station at Shopping.com' for comparing products and prices. The document also contains a URL for a Citysearch map and a DOJ-OGR identifier.
This document lists various outside service providers with their contact numbers and service frequencies. It includes details for pool maintenance, pool heating, pest control, irrigation, landscape spraying, and tree trimming, along with specific individuals to contact for certain services.
This document is a list of professional activities and speaking engagements from 1994 and 1995, likely from a CV. It details conferences, seminars, grand rounds, and workshops with their host organizations and locations across the US, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Key themes include psychology, law, trauma, memory, and sexual abuse.
This document is a list of academic institutions, legal associations, and other organizations, along with events, grouped by year from 1974 to 1980. It appears to be a chronological record of affiliations, seminars, and conferences, potentially related to a professional's career or an institution's activities. The document also includes page numbering and a document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00015246'.
This document is a list of publications (books) authored or co-authored by E.F. Loftus and also details her past affiliations and consultancies with various government agencies, organizations, and legal bodies from 1976 to 2008. The publications listed span from 1973 to 1994, focusing primarily on memory, eyewitness testimony, and psychology, with several international editions and translations noted.
This document details negotiations and internal communications surrounding a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein, focusing on the involvement of Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, and Lourie. Key points include Villafaña's revised NPA which proposed a 30-month sentence for Epstein and included non-prosecution for co-conspirators, and a dispute with Lourie over the inclusion of an immigration waiver for Epstein's foreign national assistants. The document also touches on the USAO's general stance on immigration issues and the reluctance to charge Epstein's accomplices.
This legal document argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case, asserting that the extraordinary nature of their crimes and the victims' need for transparency outweigh standard secrecy protocols. It highlights that unsealing is necessary to expose the full scope of the abuse and the network of enablers without forcing victims to expose themselves to retaliation. The filing further contends that living witnesses, specifically the victims, actively support this disclosure rather than opposing it.
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2021, argues for the questioning of attorney Brad Edwards regarding a U-Visa application he submitted for his client, Kate. The filing asserts that Kate denied seeking a U-Visa during cross-examination, making her attorney's actions relevant to her motive and bias as a witness. The document contends that this action is not protected by attorney-client privilege, or if it was, the privilege was waived.
This legal document, filed by BOP Staff Attorneys from MDC Brooklyn, addresses concerns regarding the confinement conditions of inmate Ms. Maxwell. It details her compliance with search procedures, meal schedules, health status (including weight and COVID-19 safety), and access to social and legal communications.
This document is a letter from BOP Staff Attorneys at MDC Brooklyn addressing the court regarding the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement. It details her compliance with COVID-19 protocols, meal schedules, health status, and access to legal and social communications.
This document is page 15 of a July 2019 court filing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) arguing for Jeffrey Epstein's detention. It highlights the severity of the charges (involving minors) and cites research suggesting sex offender recidivism is underreported. Crucially, it details evidence of witness tampering, including 2007 emails regarding a potential guilty plea for obstruction of justice and a 2006 Palm Beach police report where an Epstein representative allegedly threatened a victim, promising compensation for help and retribution for harm.
This document is a criminal docket entry from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, for case # 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, titled 'USA v. Epstein,' filed on July 2, 2019. It identifies Jeffrey Epstein as Defendant (1) and lists five attorneys representing him, along with their respective law firms and contact information. Judge Richard M. Berman is assigned to the case.
This legal document argues for the disclosure of grand jury transcripts in the case of Epstein and Maxwell. It contends that the extraordinary nature of their crimes, the vast number of victims, and the public interest in full accountability outweigh the usual need for grand jury secrecy. The filing emphasizes that unsealing the transcripts would help expose the full network of enablers without forcing victims to face further retaliation and that the victims themselves support this transparency.
This document is a legal filing arguing for the dismissal of a petition due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The central argument is that the Petitioners lack Article III standing because they cannot demonstrate a sufficient "injury in fact" that is redressable by the court. The filing cites numerous legal precedents, including Supreme Court decisions, to support its position on the requirements for standing.
This legal document outlines the scope and methodology of an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Prompted by a February 21, 2019, court ruling that the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) violated victims' rights, the OPR's review examined government conduct, collected extensive records, and conducted over 60 interviews. The investigation identified five subjects, including former U.S. Attorney Acosta, for their roles in the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) and related decisions.
This document is a court-filed screenshot of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) webpage, filed on January 13, 2021, as part of the case 'US v Maxwell'. The webpage details the BOP's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including its modified operations plan, emergency response protocols, and collaboration efforts with agencies like the Public Health Service (PHS) and NIC to ensure the safety of staff and inmates.
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page from June 13, 2006, belonging to a user with the screen name "YA FUCK YOU 2!!!!!!". The page lists the user's general interests, such as shopping and hanging out with friends, and includes a lengthy personal survey. The user's answers to the survey and other personal details are heavily redacted.
This legal filing from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, dated May 21, 2021, informs Judge Analisa Torres about deferred prosecution agreements reached with defendants Noel and Thomas. The defendants, employees of the Bureau of Prisons, have admitted to falsifying records at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019 and, in exchange for deferred prosecution, will cooperate with an OIG investigation and complete 100 hours of community service. The government requests a court hearing for May 25, 2021, to finalize these agreements.
This legal document is a portion of a government filing arguing against a defendant's (Thomas) motion for discovery. The government contends that searching for certain records from the BOP, CIA, and Vice President's office would be an undue burden and that a draft Inspector General report is not subject to disclosure because it is not material to the defense and is protected by deliberative process privilege. The government states the report is not yet complete and the prosecution team has no involvement in its creation.
This document is a page from a legal filing detailing an investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) into a significant gap in the email records of an individual named Acosta, specifically from May 2007 to April 2008. The investigation, which was related to the Epstein case, involved questioning witnesses and analyzing data from multiple U.S. Attorney's Offices, the FBI, and other Justice Department divisions. OPR concluded that the email gap was most likely due to a technological error rather than an intentional act to conceal evidence.
This legal document, a page from an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, analyzes the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Epstein. OPR concluded that the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) did not violate department policy by declining to prosecute two of Epstein's foreign national assistants, which would have triggered their deportation. The report also states that the evidence does not establish that prosecutors, including Acosta and Villafaña, were influenced by improper motives like Epstein's wealth when they agreed to terms favorable to him.
This document is a page from a legal brief (likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, given the case number 1:20-cr-00330) discussing legal precedents involving prosecutorial discretion and immunity. It cites Supreme Court cases such as Wayte v. United States and Imbler v. Pachtman to argue that prosecutors have broad discretion in charging decisions and absolute immunity regarding those decisions, including the decision *not* to charge. The document concludes by introducing a section on plea agreement promises of leniency towards third parties, which is relevant to the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case.
This document contains an excerpt from a report (likely by the OPR) detailing internal conflicts within the prosecution team regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It features a contentious email from prosecutor Villafaña to supervisor Menchel, accusing him of undermining the case, violating the Ashcroft memo and victims' rights, and showing weakness by offering a plea with no federal conviction. The text also includes Menchel's justification to OPR, stating that while he understood Villafaña's anxiety to file charges, her tone was disrespectful to U.S. Attorney Acosta, who sought a more 'dispassionate' approach.
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a report from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), detailing the scope and methodology of its investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office's (USAO) handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Following a court ruling on February 21, 2019, that found the USAO violated victims' rights, OPR's investigation involved reviewing extensive records, conducting over 60 interviews, and identifying former U.S. Attorney Acosta and four other individuals as subjects of the inquiry for their roles in the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-19 | Received | local and regiona... | ICE | $2,200,000,000.00 | IPO value referenced in lawsuit. | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity