| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Maghan O’ / MO
|
Debate opposing views |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | High-level policy meeting discussing Middle East strategy | Unknown | View |
This document is a Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the derivative litigation against JP Morgan Chase & Co. It outlines arguments regarding pleading standards, demand futility, and failure to state claims against the defendants, including specific points related to JPMorgan's termination of Epstein as a client and the oversight of internal controls by the board of directors. The document includes a table of authorities citing numerous legal cases.
This document appears to be page 3 of a transcript or notes from a high-level foreign policy meeting involving Brent Scowcroft, James Steinberg, and individuals identified as JS and MO. The discussion focuses on the geopolitical dynamics between the US, Turkey, Iraq, and Iran, specifically addressing the Syrian conflict (Assad), Kurdish independence, and the influence of Shia/Sunni divides. It carries a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a transcript or summary of a policy discussion regarding the US withdrawal from Iraq. The dialogue, primarily between 'Maghan O’' and 'Jim Steinberg', debates whether the Obama administration did enough to secure a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) to keep residual troops in the region. The text highlights concerns about Nouri al-Maliki (NAM) consolidating power and the potential alienation of the Kurds following the US departure.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity