| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jim Steinberg / JS
|
Debate opposing views |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Aspen Strategy Group meeting discussion on US Policy on Arab Revolutions. | Aspen Strategy Group (Likel... | View |
This document appears to be a transcript or summary of a policy discussion regarding the US withdrawal from Iraq. The dialogue, primarily between 'Maghan O’' and 'Jim Steinberg', debates whether the Obama administration did enough to secure a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) to keep residual troops in the region. The text highlights concerns about Nouri al-Maliki (NAM) consolidating power and the potential alienation of the Kurds following the US departure.
A document containing notes summarized by 'TJP' (likely Thomas J. Pritzker) from an Aspen Strategy Group meeting regarding US Policy on Arab Revolutions. The document records a debate between various foreign policy experts and former administration officials (Indyk, Feaver, Kahl, Flournoy, etc.) concerning the Obama administration's handling of the Arab Spring, specifically situations in Syria, Iraq, Libya, and Iran. The document bears a House Oversight bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein/JP Morgan probes given the known context of these document releases.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity