Hach
PersonMentions
2
Relationships
0
Events
1
Documents
1
Relationship Network
Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons.
Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count.
Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak).
Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
Event Timeline
Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998-01-01 | N/A | Seventh Circuit decision in United States v. Hach | US Court of Appeals | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017673.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney David Schoen, bearing a House Oversight Committee stamp. It presents a legal argument citing a 2007 Utah Law Review article and various precedents (Ritchie, Brady, Hach) to argue that constitutional discovery obligations apply only to the government/state actors, not to third parties or crime victims. The text specifically argues against the ability of defendants to subpoena medical or psychiatric records from third-party witnesses who are not state agents.
Legal brief / filing (page 38 of 78)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity