| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984-01-01 | Court ruling | The Supreme Court ruled in Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart. | N/A | View |
This document is page 11 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated September 16, 2020. It presents legal arguments regarding the 'collateral-order doctrine' and protective orders in criminal cases, arguing that such orders are generally not subject to interlocutory appeal. The text cites various precedents (Firestone, Caparros, Pappas) to support the argument that restricting the dissemination of discovery materials does not violate First Amendment rights and that challenges to such orders should await final judgment.
This legal document, page 12 of a filing from September 16, 2020, argues that protective orders regulating the use of documents in a criminal case are not subject to interlocutory appeal. It cites numerous court precedents, including from the Supreme Court, to establish that such orders are not immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine and do not constitute an impermissible prior restraint under the First Amendment. The document asserts that any challenge to a litigant's right to release documents can wait until a final judgment is rendered.
This document appears to be a compilation of news articles or blog posts regarding Steve Ballmer's resignation as CEO of Microsoft in 2013. The text details the financial struggles of the company (Surface RT losses), pressure from activist investor ValueAct to obtain a board seat, and the internal dynamics involving Bill Gates and the search for a new leader. It concludes with the beginning of an op-ed by Paul Krugman titled 'The Decline of E-Empires'. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity