Michael Casey
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Minor Victim-1
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-1
|
Agent |
5
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00021027.jpg
This document is page 44 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on April 29, 2022, denying the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) Rule 29 motion to vacate convictions. The court rejects arguments regarding prejudice due to absent deceased witnesses (including Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Detective Joseph Recarey) and claims of pre-indictment delay. The text references evidence establishing the Defendant's close work with an individual named Markham on a manual and checklists.
DOJ-OGR-00010410.jpg
This document is page 44 of a court order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's Rule 29 motion and motion to vacate convictions. The court rejects arguments regarding prejudice due to deceased witnesses (including Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Joseph Recarey) and pre-indictment delay. The text references evidence GX-424, an email chain showing Maxwell worked closely with an individual named Markham to create a household manual.
DOJ-OGR-00009600.jpg
This legal document is a court filing in which the defendant argues for the case to be dismissed due to substantial prejudice caused by pre-indictment delay. The defendant claims the deaths of several witnesses, including architects, a property manager, and a housekeeper who worked for Epstein, as well as others like Jeffrey Epstein himself, prevent a fair trial. The document indicates the Court has previously rejected these arguments as speculative and lacking evidence of actual prejudice.
DOJ-OGR-00003008.jpg
This legal document is a filing that argues against a defendant's motion. The defendant claims that testimony from Michael Casey (agent for Minor Victim-1) and Detective Recarey would have been exculpatory. The filing counters that this proposed testimony is speculative, unsubstantiated, likely inadmissible hearsay, and ultimately irrelevant to the charges that the defendant assisted Epstein in the grooming and abuse of other victims.
DOJ-OGR-00003006.jpg
A page from a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text argues against Maxwell's motion claiming prejudice due to pre-indictment delay, specifically rejecting her assertion that the deaths of potential witnesses (Jeffrey Epstein, his mother, Michael Casey, and Detective Recarey) harmed her defense. The court/prosecution argues it is highly speculative to assume Epstein would have waived his Fifth Amendment rights to testify in Maxwell's favor and be found credible by a jury.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity