This document appears to be a draft page (dated 4.2.12) from a book or memoir by Alan Dershowitz (identified as AD). It details a transcript of a conversation with white supremacist Matthew Hale (MH) and a moderator (KC) regarding Dershowitz potentially representing Hale to defend First Amendment rights. The narrative concludes that Dershowitz did not represent Hale because Hale refused to let the legal fees be donated to the ADL and NAACP, and notes that Hale was subsequently imprisoned for ordering a hit on a judge and allegedly also threatened Dershowitz, requiring FBI protection.
This page appears to be an excerpt from a draft manuscript (dated 4.2.12) written by Alan Dershowitz (identified by reference to his book 'Chutzpah'). The text discusses the rise of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism, recounting a specific violent protest against Dershowitz at Faneuil Hall in 2004 where he was compared to Hitler and Goebbels. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of document production for a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a draft essay or manuscript, likely written by Alan Dershowitz (given the style and context of the Epstein files, though his name is not explicitly on this page), dated April 2, 2012. The text discusses the philosophy of the First Amendment, praising groups that defend speech they oppose while criticizing the ACLU for failing to defend right-wing or controversial speech on college campuses. It bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a page from a report or book (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the context and style, though not explicitly named) submitted to the House Oversight Committee. It details an incident where the Muslim Student Union disrupted a speech by Ambassador Oren, leading to criminal charges by the District Attorney. The author criticizes local ACLU leaders for defending the disruptors and framing the censorship as a peaceful protest, contrasting this with the author's own long history of supporting the ACLU and free speech.
This document appears to be page 133 of a manuscript or memoir (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the Bruce Franklin case) produced to the House Oversight Committee. The text discusses First Amendment principles, specifically the 'violence veto,' and recounts the narrator's legal representation of Stanford Professor Bruce Franklin in 1970. It details Franklin's speeches inciting students to shut down the Stanford Computation Center, the subsequent police intervention, and Franklin's eventual firing by University President Lyman.
This document appears to be a draft page (dated April 2, 2012) from a book manuscript, likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the specific anecdote about Skokie and his mother. The text is 'Chapter 8' and discusses First Amendment rights, specifically the 'fighting words' doctrine. The author recounts their involvement in the Skokie case, where they urged the ACLU to defend the rights of neo-Nazis to march, arguing against censorship even for offensive speech. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This excerpt, likely from a book by a prominent civil rights lawyer (possibly Alan Dershowitz), critiques the misuse of Justice Holmes' "shouting fire in a crowded theater" analogy in various legal contexts involving free speech. The author discusses how the analogy has been stretched to justify censorship in cases regarding pornography, hate speech (specifically the Skokie neo-Nazi march), and parody (Jerry Falwell vs. Larry Flynt).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity