| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
McHugh
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
This document is an Institution Supplement (NYM 7331.04e) for the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York, dated November 13, 2014. It outlines detailed policies and procedures for the management, housing, screening, and rights of pretrial inmates held at the facility. The document covers intake procedures, medical screening, housing assignments, visiting rules, legal resources, and disciplinary protocols.
A letter dated June 10, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss (SDNY) to the Legal Department of the Metropolitan Detention Center. The letter provides a password (which is redacted in the document) for a disc containing discovery materials related to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
This document is an email chain from January 2021 involving defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and government/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be provided to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. The correspondence also includes a request for Maxwell to have access to a government-provided laptop to review discovery materials, arguing that MDC computers are insufficient for her defense.
This document is an email chain from August 5, 2020, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York and an official at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The discussion concerns the protocol for delivering a hard drive containing discovery materials to inmate Ghislaine Maxwell. The facility official instructs that the drive can be password protected if the password is provided in a cover letter, and that the drive must be etched with a number and accompanied by an authorization memo.
This document is page 172 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named McHugh. The questioning covers the specifics of 'power of attorney,' specifically regarding signatory authority and writing checks. The questioning then shifts to a company named 'Air Ghislaine,' referencing prior testimony about line items indicating a helicopter purchase involving that company.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity