Craig Brubaker
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
David
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Parse
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Parse
|
Co conspirators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Berke
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Parse
|
Co defendant |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Criminal conspiracy | A wide-ranging corrupt endeavor to obstruct and impede the IRS and defraud the IRS through the de... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A jury trial where David was acquitted on tax conspiracy and substantive tax evasion counts, and ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Prosecution | Prosecution of brokers who performed functions for Jenkins and other law firms. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | A wide-ranging corrupt endeavor and mail fraud scheme to defraud the IRS through the design, mark... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A jury acquitted David on tax conspiracy and tax evasion counts, and completely acquitted his co-... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010207.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from March 18, 2013, argues for a significant prison sentence for an individual named Parse. It details his central role as a Deutsche Bank representative in a massive criminal tax fraud scheme involving multiple co-conspirators and fraudulent tax shelters, which generated over $7 billion in fraudulent deductions and caused over $230 million in actual losses to the U.S. Treasury. The document highlights that Parse earned over $3 million in commissions for his indispensable role in the scheme.
DOJ-OGR-00010196.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing submitted by Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III on March 7, 2013, regarding the sentencing of David Parse. It argues for leniency, distinguishing Parse's role as a broker executing trades from those who designed the illegal tax shelters (referencing Donna Guerin and the Jenkins law firm). The document appears to be an exhibit (A-5941) filed in the later Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN) in 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00010193.jpg
This legal document, a letter from Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III, argues on behalf of a client named David. It contends that while David was convicted for 'backdating' transactions, the jury's acquittal on more serious tax evasion and conspiracy charges suggests they believed he was unaware of the illegality of the Jenkins tax shelter scheme itself. The letter posits that David was given comfort by the participation of major entities like Deutsche Bank and believed he was exploiting a legal 'loophole'.
DOJ-OGR-00010108.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a direct examination of an individual named Berke. Berke testifies about events on May 11, 2011, when the court read a note from Juror Catherine Conrad regarding jury instructions. Berke also discusses his professional relationship with another lawyer, Susan Brune, who represented David Parse in the same case, and recalls speaking with her about the juror.
DOJ-OGR-00009528.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 18, 2013, outlines the case against an individual named Parse, an investment representative at Deutsche Bank. It details his central role in a massive criminal tax fraud scheme involving fraudulent tax shelters, which resulted in over $7 billion in fraudulent deductions and over $230 million in actual losses to the U.S. Treasury. The document argues that Parse's conduct, for which he earned over $3 million in commissions, warrants a significant prison sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00009517.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III dated March 7, 2013, argues for a lenient sentence for their client, David Parse. The letter contends that Parse's role was limited to that of a broker executing trades, not designing or marketing illegal tax shelters, and that the sentencing guidelines are too harsh for his level of culpability. It further notes that of all the brokers performing similar functions for the law firm Jenkins, only Parse and Craig Brubaker were prosecuted, with Parse being the only one convicted.
DOJ-OGR-00009514.jpg
This legal document, a page from a letter to Judge William H. Pauley, III, argues that a defendant named David was not a culpable participant in the illegal aspects of the Jenkins tax shelter scheme. The author contends that David's acquittal on conspiracy and tax evasion charges, along with his co-defendant's full acquittal, shows the jury believed David did not know the shelters were illegal. The document attributes David's belief in the shelters' legality to high-level approval from Deutsche Bank and the belief that a legal "loophole" had been found, suggesting his convictions for mail fraud and tax obstruction were solely for separate "backdating" transactions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity