Mr. Nardello
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Brune
|
Professional |
6
|
2 |
DOJ-OGR-00010046.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning centers on jury research conducted for jury selection, a specific telephone call on July 22nd with a judge regarding a juror connected to Catherine Conrad, and the witness's failure to identify "Mr. Nardello's firm" during that call. The transcript concludes with the witness confirming their firm resisted a subsequent government discovery request by filing a brief claiming the information was protected as client work product.
DOJ-OGR-00009998.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on March 23, 2022. Brune testifies about juror research conducted by the Nardello firm, clarifying it was strictly limited to database research and did not involve fieldwork. Brune also outlines the role of team member Suann Ingle, who was responsible for creating and presenting trial graphics.
DOJ-OGR-00009997.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal testimony where a witness named Brune is being questioned. The testimony focuses on the collaborative relationship with the law firm Kramer Levin and the joint hiring of the Nardello firm for investigative work. The background of Mr. Nardello as a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and his firm's motto, "We find out," are also discussed.
DOJ-OGR-00009365.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is testifying about a July 22nd phone call with the Judge regarding the identification of jury consultants, specifically mentioning Mr. Donohue, Julie Blackman, and Mr. Schoeman. The testimony clarifies that Mr. Nardello performed investigative work but was not a jury consultant.
DOJ-OGR-00009319.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on February 24, 2022, where an individual named Brune is being questioned. Brune clarifies that the jury research conducted by the Nardello firm was strictly limited to database searches per his instructions. He also details the role of Suann Ingle of Ingle Communications, who was part of his team and responsible for creating and presenting graphics for opening and closing statements, some of which were for a Dr. DeRosa.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity