This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is testifying about a July 22nd phone call with the Judge regarding the identification of jury consultants, specifically mentioning Mr. Donohue, Julie Blackman, and Mr. Schoeman. The testimony clarifies that Mr. Nardello performed investigative work but was not a jury consultant.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Testifying under direct examination regarding jury consultants and voir dire.
|
| Mr. Donohue | Subject of testimony |
Identified in relation to jury consultants and a relationship with a law firm.
|
| Mr. Gair | Attorney (implied) |
Made statements about Mr. Donohue's relationship with his law firm.
|
| Julie Blackman | Subject of testimony |
Identified during the proceedings, context implies role as jury consultant.
|
| The Court / The Judge | Judge |
Asked questions on a July 22nd phone call regarding who was involved in the voir dire process.
|
| Mr. Schoeman | Subject of testimony |
Responded to the Court's question regarding jury consultants.
|
| Mr. Nardello | Investigator |
Described as doing investigative work but 'simply not a jury consultant'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in footer.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by the footer Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.
|
"prompted us to doubt the voir dire and to investigate."Source
"We were talking about the jury consultants, and Mr. Nardello was simply not a jury consultant."Source
"He did investigated work related to the very topic that the judge had just indicated he was interested in, correct?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,401 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document