DOJ-OGR-00009365.jpg

429 KB

Extraction Summary

7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (testimony)
File Size: 429 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on February 24, 2022. A witness named Brune is testifying about a July 22nd phone call with the Judge regarding the identification of jury consultants, specifically mentioning Mr. Donohue, Julie Blackman, and Mr. Schoeman. The testimony clarifies that Mr. Nardello performed investigative work but was not a jury consultant.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Brune Witness
Testifying under direct examination regarding jury consultants and voir dire.
Mr. Donohue Subject of testimony
Identified in relation to jury consultants and a relationship with a law firm.
Mr. Gair Attorney (implied)
Made statements about Mr. Donohue's relationship with his law firm.
Julie Blackman Subject of testimony
Identified during the proceedings, context implies role as jury consultant.
The Court / The Judge Judge
Asked questions on a July 22nd phone call regarding who was involved in the voir dire process.
Mr. Schoeman Subject of testimony
Responded to the Court's question regarding jury consultants.
Mr. Nardello Investigator
Described as doing investigative work but 'simply not a jury consultant'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting service listed in footer.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Implied by the footer Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (2 events)

July 22nd
Phone call where the Judge asked questions about jury consultants.
N/A
The Judge Counsel
March 1st
Commencement of voir dire.
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied jurisdiction based on 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.

Relationships (2)

Mr. Donohue Professional/Legal Mr. Gair
Mr. Gair made statements about Mr. Donohue's relationship with his law firm.
Mr. Schoeman Legal Proceeding The Court
Mr. Schoeman responded to the Court's question.

Key Quotes (3)

"prompted us to doubt the voir dire and to investigate."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009365.jpg
Quote #1
"We were talking about the jury consultants, and Mr. Nardello was simply not a jury consultant."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009365.jpg
Quote #2
"He did investigated work related to the very topic that the judge had just indicated he was interested in, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009365.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,401 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 76 of 130
A-5761
304
C2grdau2 Brune - direct
1 prompted us to doubt the voir dire and to investigate.
2 Q. One of the questions that the judge asked on the July 22nd
3 phonecall related to the jury consultants in this case,
4 correct?
5 A. That's right.
6 Q. You identified Mr. Donohue, correct?
7 A. That's right.
8 Q. I believe Mr. Gair also made some statements about Mr.
9 Donohue's relationship with his law firm, correct?
10 A. Right.
11 Q. Julie Blackman was identified, correct?
12 A. That's right.
13 Q. The Court specifically said that he was looking to
14 understand who was involved in the process, meaning the voir
15 dire process, between the time that the juror questionnaires
16 were completed and the time the voir dire commenced on March
17 1st. Do you recall that?
18 A. I looked back at the transcript in preparation for the
19 hearing. I think the Court in context was asking about the
20 jury consultants, which is Mr. Schoeman responded to the
21 Court's question by saying -- either he responded or it was in
22 the whole thing. We were talking about the jury consultants,
23 and Mr. Nardello was simply not a jury consultant.
24 Q. He did investigated work related to the very topic that the
25 judge had just indicated he was interested in, correct?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009365

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document