Trove
Sign In Sign Up

AUSA

Organization
Mentions
30
Relationships
16
Events
107
Documents
15
Also known as:
AUSA-SDFL (Assistant United States Attorney - Southern District of Florida) USAO SDNY (Implied by AUSA and SDNY footer) US Attorney's Office (implied by AUSA reference) University of Lausanne US Attorney's Office (AUSA)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
16 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Epstein
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Security Chiefs
Supervisory
1
1
View
person Judge Parker
Legal representative
1
1
View
person I
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Attorney Advisor
Business associate
1
1
View
person witness
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Investigative Team
Co travelers
1
1
View
person Project Safe Childhood Coordinator
Supervisory administrative
1
1
View
person FBI agents
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Redacted Recipient
Professional oversight
1
1
View
organization FBI
Professional cooperative
1
1
View
person Darlene
Professional
1
1
View
organization FBI
Professional cooperation
1
1
View
person Ms. Brune
Former employment
1
1
View
person R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Subordinate supervisor implicit
1
1
View
person agents
Collaborators
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-04-14 N/A Evidence Review Day 2 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor View
2021-04-13 N/A Start of daily evidence review with Ms. Maxwell present at 500 Pearl Street. 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY View
2021-04-13 N/A Evidence review for Ghislaine Maxwell case 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor... View
2021-04-13 N/A Evidence Review Day 1 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor View
2021-04-13 N/A Evidence review session for Ghislaine Maxwell and her defense team. 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor... View
2021-04-13 N/A Scheduled start of daily evidence review with Ghislaine Maxwell present. 500 Pearl Street, NY View
2021-04-13 N/A Evidence review by Maxwell and defense team at 500 Pearl Street. 500 Pearl Street, 5th Floor View
2021-04-12 N/A Scheduled evidence review at FBI Bronx Warehouse. 2350 Lafayette Ave, Bronx, NY View
2021-04-12 N/A Planned visit by Defense team (Everdell, investigator, paralegal) to FBI Bronx Warehouse to inspe... 2350 Lafayette Ave, Bronx, NY View
2021-04-12 N/A Scheduled defense team review of physical evidence at FBI Bronx Warehouse. 2350 Lafayette Ave, Bronx, NY View
2021-04-12 N/A Scheduled evidence review at FBI Bronx Warehouse and 500 Pearl Street. 2350 Lafayette Ave, Bronx, ... View
2021-04-12 N/A Proposed physical evidence review at 500 Pearl Street. 500 Pearl Street View
2021-04-12 N/A Proposed timeframe for physical evidence review at 500 Pearl Street. 500 Pearl Street, NY View
2021-04-12 N/A Evidence review at FBI Warehouse 2350 Lafayette Ave, Bronx, NY View
2021-02-17 N/A SDNY request for follow-up on evidence retention and travel records. New York View
2021-02-11 N/A Proposed phone call between AUSA and Nader attorney. Phone (757-395-9043) View
2020-11-12 N/A Scheduled WebEx interview/proffer between US Attorney's Office, FBI, and Mr. [Redacted] (represen... WebEx (Virtual) View
2020-11-12 N/A WebEx Proffer Interview/Meeting Virtual (WebEx) View
2020-11-12 N/A Scheduled WebEx interview/proffer with Witness, Defense Counsel, AUSA, and two FBI agents regardi... WebEx (Virtual) View
2020-10-07 N/A Meeting where participants saw each other (referenced in Oct 8 email). WebEx (Virtual) View
2020-10-07 N/A Previous meeting referenced in email dated Oct 8. Unknown View
2020-09-29 N/A Phone call between Christian Everdell and the AUSA regarding discovery materials. Phone Call View
2020-08-21 N/A Date of a letter from the AUSA regarding review of seized items. Letter View
2020-07-07 N/A Phone call received by AUSA regarding a potential meeting with a witness/subject. N/A View
2020-07-06 N/A Judge Nathan directed parties to file a letter by 9 PM. Court View

EFTA00038147.pdf

This document is an internal FBI email thread from November 2020 discussing the logistics of a 'Discovery laptop' and hard drive. The emails coordinate a meeting where the defense team (presumably for Ghislaine Maxwell, referred to as 'Maxwell') is scheduled to review materials from 10am-3p. The agents discuss dress code for the meeting and the handover of the laptop from an analyst.

Email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00037952.pdf

This document is an email chain from June 29, 2020, coordinating the signing and swearing out of the arrest warrant and indictment for Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Parker (USMJ) communicates with redacted parties (likely prosecutors/AUSA) to schedule a call with an agent to finalize the warrant process. The attachments confirm the subject is Maxwell.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00036760.pdf

This document is an internal advisory (likely an email) sent to staff at MCC New York, advising them of their rights during a criminal investigation. It instructs staff that while they must report interviews with agencies like the FBI, AUSA, or OIG, they are entitled to Union representation (Weingarten rights) and legal counsel/silence (5th Amendment). The document includes a quote from Serena Williams and originates from the facility where Jeffrey Epstein was held.

Internal memo / union advisory email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00035750.pdf

An FBI FD-1036 form dated December 4, 2019, documenting an interview that took place on November 13, 2019. Assistant US Attorneys and an OIG Special Agent interviewed 'Employee 32' regarding 'institutional counts performed at MCC' as part of the Jeffrey Epstein death investigation.

Fbi fd-1036 import form
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030427.pdf

This document is a 'Request for Compensatory Time (CT/T) for Travel' form dated November 6, 2019, for a trip taking place from November 13-15, 2019. The traveler (name redacted) is traveling from JFK to LAX (Santa Monica, CA) for Temporary Duty (TDY). The document includes instructions on page 1 and the specific travel log for the employee on page 2, detailing their departure from JFK and arrival at LAX.

Government administrative form (request for compensatory time for travel)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00026830.pdf

An email dated October 9, 2020, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email forwards several draft non-prosecution and plea agreements dated January and February 2020 related to 'JE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein case files). The sender notes the files were in their AUSA folder and might not be obvious otherwise.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019830.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 15, 2019, among likely DOJ/SDNY officials discussing a voicemail received from an attorney named David Hall (phone number 2022466629). The sender notes that the message 'relates to the Epstein case' and explains that Hall obtained their number through a mutual friend, a former AUSA in Cleveland, because Hall was seeking an SDNY contact. The recipient agrees to call Hall back.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00017780.pdf

An email chain from September 17, 2019, regarding the continued investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's collaborators. An Assistant Attorney General (likely from New Mexico, indicated by 'NMAG files') sends digital access credentials and a notification of physical evidence (CD) to a recipient (likely an Assistant U.S. Attorney). The email is then forwarded internally with a request to save the materials to an 'Epstein share'.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00021068.jpg

This document, dated February 28, 2023, appears to be a legal filing summarizing trial testimony against Ghislaine Maxwell. It highlights inconsistencies between trial testimony and pre-trial statements made by accusers 'Jane' and 'Carolyn' regarding Maxwell's presence and involvement in sexual abuse. Specifically, it notes that Carolyn did not mention Maxwell in 2007 FBI interviews or a 2008 lawsuit, despite implicating her at trial.

Court filing / legal brief (review of trial evidence)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00016872.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It records the conclusion of testimony by a witness named Ms. Healy, the dismissal of the jury for lunch, and a subsequent procedural discussion regarding the release of AUSA Alex Rossmiller from a defense subpoena.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00010026.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on March 24, 2022. It features the direct examination of Ms. Brune (a former AUSA), questioning her decision not to alert the Court about Google search results regarding a juror found around March 12th. Brune testifies that she did not report it because she relied on the juror's sworn statements claiming to be a 'stay at home wife,' leading Brune to believe the search results referred to a different person.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009377.jpg

This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, capturing the testimony of a witness named Brune. During redirect and recross examination, Brune explains that a particular document resembled a credit report and merely confirmed a pre-existing belief, hence they chose not to investigate further despite their past training as an AUSA. The questioning then turns to redacted Social Security numbers on the document and what the witness learned from an unredacted version.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009347.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (page 286) filed on February 24, 2022. It features the direct examination testimony of Ms. Brune (likely a defense attorney), who is being questioned about her failure to bring Google search results regarding a juror to the Court's attention during or after voir dire. Brune defends her actions by stating she believed the information she found referred to a different person than the juror, based on the juror's sworn statements claiming to be a 'stay at home wife' rather than an attorney. Brune also affirms her obligation to the Court remains the same as when she was an Assistant US Attorney (AUSA).

Court transcript / testimony
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033153.jpg

These handwritten notes appear to be a summary of various incidents and key points related to an investigation. The notes cover surveillance activities by Wackenhut possibly involving a P.I. with mob ties, local police matters like a burglary and a man in the bushes, and a chase involving a Chrysler 300. A key decision highlighted is the choice not to file charges against a co-defendant named Janusz Banacell.

Handwritten notes
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013841.jpg

This document appears to be a page from a book (likely 'The 4-Hour Workweek' by Tim Ferriss) or a manuscript discussing the 'Pareto Principle' or '80/20 Rule'. It details the history of economist Vilfredo Pareto and the author's personal application of the principle to overcome professional burnout and inefficiency. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013841' stamp, indicating it was included in a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely found among files seized in the Epstein investigation.

Book excerpt / manuscript page (evidence file)
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search