Election judges

Person

Mentions

5

Relationships

2

Events

4

Documents

2

Also known as:

judges Judges

Search

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.

2 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
organization NACDL	Membership	6	1	View
organization [REDACTED]	Professional	1	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	Judicial review	Six judges (five from the appellate division, one from the Supreme Court) reviewed a probable cau...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	AUSA's decision to protect young women of Palm Beach, followed by her chastisement by local judge...	Palm Beach	View
2020-01-14	N/A	Meetings with Judges	Unknown	View
2012-11-08	N/A	The St. Croix Board of Elections sorted over 2,700 paper ballots from the election.	St. Croix	View

EFTA00019231.pdf

An email chain from January 2020 discussing the scheduling of a presentation by defense counsel for 'full brass' (likely senior leadership). The participants negotiate times between Thursday, January 23rd, and Friday, January 24th, eventually settling on Friday the 24th at 3:30 PM. One email mentions a redacted individual having meetings lined up with 'all of the Judges'.

Email chain

2025-12-25

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008919.jpg

This legal document, dated February 9, 2022, from Winston & Strawn LLP, describes the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and its practice of filing amicus curiae briefs. It cites legal precedents for amicus participation and requests the Court's permission to file an amicus brief regarding a motion for a new trial based on juror misconduct. The document notes that Counsel for the Defendant has consented, while Counsel for the DOJ has not yet responded to inquiries.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

0

As Recipient

0

Total

0

No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity