MS. MUSUMECI
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
prosecutor's office
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) Hearing filed in court. | Courtroom (implied NY based... | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | SORA Hearing filing date (Hearing page 9) | Courtroom (likely SDNY base... | View |
| 2018-12-28 | N/A | SORA Hearing | New York (implied) | View |
| 2018-12-28 | N/A | SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing | New York (Implied) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000378.jpg
This document is page 12 of a transcript from a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing filed on July 15, 2019. The dialogue involves a judge, prosecutor Ms. Gaffney, and defense attorney Ms. Musumeci discussing why Jeffrey Epstein must register as a sex offender in New York despite the specific acts (relations with a 17-year-old) not being registrable offenses under NY law; the requirement stems from reciprocity with his Florida offense. The Judge remarks that Epstein must register every 90 days or 'give up his New York home.'
DOJ-OGR-00000377.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing, filed as an exhibit in July 2019. The dialogue involves a prosecutor (Ms. Gaffney), a defense attorney (Ms. Musumeci), and the Judge discussing the age of a victim (disputed between 16 and 17) during her sexual relationship with the defendant. The defense argues that while the defendant pleaded guilty to 'under 18' in Florida, New York SORA laws require clear evidence of the victim being under 17 for registration as a sex offender.
DOJ-OGR-00000376.jpg
This document is a page from a transcript of a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing filed on July 15, 2019. Attorneys Musumeci and Gaffney explain to the Court the specifics of Jeffrey Epstein's previous Florida plea deal, clarifying that while the indictment was not registrable, he pleaded guilty to a second offense 'by information'—specifically 'procuring a person under 18 for prostitution'—which requires registration.
DOJ-OGR-00000375.jpg
This document is page 9 of a transcript from a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing filed on July 15, 2019. The defense argues that the original Florida prosecutor, Lanna Belohlavek, stated there were 'no real victims' and that the conduct was 'commercial' and voluntary, lacking force. Ms. Musumeci addresses the court regarding the Florida investigation's conclusion that the offense was non-registrable at the time, though the Judge counters that it is registrable in the current jurisdiction.
DOJ-OGR-00000374.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing, filed as part of a 2019 criminal case. The text details arguments regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex offender registration status in New York, specifically arguing against a 'Level Three' designation which would require frequent 90-day renewals. The defense argues Epstein is compliant, rarely stays in New York for long periods, and that other jurisdictions have required lower or no registration.
DOJ-OGR-00000372.jpg
This document is page 6 of a transcript from a SORA (Sex Offender Registration Act) hearing filed on July 15, 2019. The discussion involves attorneys Ms. Gaffney and Ms. Musumeci addressing the Court regarding a board recommendation and access to prosecutor files. Ms. Musumeci clarifies for the record that Jeffrey Epstein is not a resident of New York, but rather maintains a vacation home there, with his primary residence being in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Epstein's Compliance
Stating Epstein has already registered and recognizes the duty, but reserving right to appeal.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity