Palm Beach, Florida
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00011475.pdf
This document is an Executive Summary of a November 2020 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility report investigating the 2006-2008 federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. It details the negotiation of the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) approved by then-US Attorney Alexander Acosta, which allowed Epstein to plead to lesser state charges, and examines the failure of the government to consult with victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The report concludes that while Acosta and other attorneys did not commit professional misconduct by definition, Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' in resolving the case via the NPA and the government failed to treat victims with necessary forthrightness.
EFTA00010507.pdf
This document is a court opinion and order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States. The court ruled that the government violated the Petitioners' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with them before entering into a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The court granted partial summary judgment for the Petitioners regarding the CVRA violation and denied the government's cross-motion, while deferring the issue of remedy to a later date.
EFTA00010471.pdf
This document contains draft remarks prepared for the Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI New York Field Office regarding the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein in July 2019. The remarks detail charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy involving dozens of minor girls in New York and Florida between 2002 and 2005, describe the recruitment methods involving cash payments, and issue a public plea for other victims to contact the FBI.
EFTA00010249.pdf
This document is an email forwarding a Law360 article dated April 24, 2019, detailing a legal victory for Jeffrey Epstein. A Florida appeals court ruled that Jean-Luc Brunel's modeling agency, MC2, failed to properly serve Epstein with a lawsuit because they served his business address rather than his primary residence on Little St. James. The article also references the wider context of Epstein's legal history, including the 2007 plea deal involving Alexander Acosta and allegations connecting Brunel to Epstein's trafficking ring.
EFTA00009116.pdf
This document is a transcript of a deposition or interview with R. Alexander Acosta, conducted by the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. The transcript covers discussions about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), victim notification issues, internal Department of Justice communications, and interactions with Epstein's defense team, including Ken Starr and Jay Lefkowitz. Acosta defends his office's decisions, emphasizing the goal of securing sex offender registration and restitution, while addressing criticisms regarding the perceived leniency and lack of transparency with victims.
EFTA00007975.pdf
This document is a Town of Palm Beach Police Department evidence form dated February 20, 2006, regarding Case #05-368. It logs a single item of evidence described as a 'micro/Phone calls TO [Redacted]' attributed to suspect Jeff Epstein. The document includes a placeholder page stating the item (a Sony MC-90 micro tape) was not scanned, followed by a photocopy of the physical tape and its case with labels redacted.
EFTA00007965.pdf
A Town of Palm Beach Police Department evidence record dated January 19, 2006, encompassing a microcassette tape (Property #06-59) related to Case #05-368 with Jeffrey Epstein listed as the suspect. The tape itself is labeled 'STATEMENT' on side A, though the specific title and side B content are redacted. A placeholder page indicates the physical tape item was not scanned.
EFTA00007962.pdf
A Town of Palm Beach Police Department evidence log dated January 9, 2006, regarding Case #05-368. The evidence consists of one Sony MC-90 microcassette tape associated with suspect Jeff Epstein. The specific description of the tape's contents is redacted on the log and the case label.
EFTA00007887.pdf
This document is an evidence record from the Town of Palm Beach Police Department dated November 4, 2005, regarding Case #05-368. It logs a micro-cassette tape (Property #05-1052) labeled 'phone calls' or 'Phone Call' associated with suspect 'Jeff Epstien' [sic]. The file includes a photo of the physical cassette tape (Sony MC-90) but notes that the media itself was not scanned/digitized.
EFTA00007775.pdf
This document contains images of evidence packaging and labels for a Sony microcassette tape collected by the Town of Palm Beach Police Department on December 13, 2005. The suspect is listed as 'Jeff Epstien' (misspelled) under Case #05-368. The file includes an FBI evidence identifier (1B7-22) and a placeholder notice stating the physical media (the audio tape) was not scanned or digitized.
EFTA00007769.pdf
This document contains photos of an evidence bag and a physical item—a Sony MC-90 micro-cassette tape—processed by the Town of Palm Beach Police Department on December 15, 2005. The evidence bag lists 'Epstein' as the suspect and assigns Case # 05-368 and Property # 05-1090. The specific contents or labels on the cassette are redacted, and a placeholder page notes that the audio media itself was not scanned/digitized.
EFTA00007570.pdf
This document set contains photographs of physical evidence processed by the Town of Palm Beach Police Department on April 4, 2005, related to Case #05-368. The evidence consists of a Maxell C90 audio cassette tape labeled 'Voice Mail messages' (Property #05-313). The name of the suspect and the collecting officer are redacted on the evidence bag.
EFTA00005711.pdf
This document is a formal notification from the US Legal Attache to the Australian Federal Police regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It details that a US citizen victim, currently residing in Glenning Valley, NSW, has agreed to be interviewed by FBI Miami agents at the US Consulate in Sydney on March 17, 2011. The document outlines allegations that Epstein paid underage girls for sex, provided this specific victim with an apartment, and instructed her to have sex with associates in the US and overseas.
EFTA00003951.pdf
This document is an evidence file (Item 80, Property #051024) from the Town of Palm Beach Police Department's 2005 investigation (Case 05-366). It contains miscellaneous photographs, including a clear image of Jeffrey Epstein sleeping while holding the book 'Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde', as well as several heavily redacted photos of unidentified individuals in a bedroom and a pool. The file also includes scans of negative sleeves and the physical evidence envelope.
EFTA00003868.pdf
This document consists of investigative records from the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office and Palm Beach Police Department from July and August 2006, related to Case #05-368 and #06-1078. It contains biographical data sheets for Jeffrey Epstein (Jacket #0338617) and several redacted individuals used in photo lineups, along with the actual photo lineup sheets showing Epstein's mugshot in various positions. The file also includes a redacted Florida driver's license database record (D.A.V.I.D.) for an unidentified female and signed instructions given to witnesses prior to viewing the photo lineups.
EFTA00003440.pdf
This document is a photograph marked with the evidence identifier EFTA00003440. It depicts a male subject, identified in court documents and media reports as Jeffrey Epstein, dressed in drag consisting of a black and white striped top, a blue lace bra, red panties with silver embellishments, and red and white striped thigh-high stockings. The subject is wearing heavy makeup and posing against a pink wall.
DOJ-OGR-00000225.tif
This document outlines the conviction and sentencing of a petitioner for their role in Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse network between approximately 1994 and 2004. The petitioner was found guilty of conspiring to transport minors for sexual activity, transporting minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking of a minor, receiving a 240-month prison sentence. The document details the pattern of abuse involving identifying vulnerable girls, isolating them, and paying them for sexualized massages, which took place at Epstein's residences in Palm Beach, Florida, and New York City.
DOJ-OGR-00000157.tif
This document provides an overview of the initial investigations into Jeffrey Epstein, starting with a 2005 complaint to the Palm Beach Police Department. It details how the local investigation led to a state grand jury indictment in 2006, and subsequently, dissatisfaction with state handling prompted a referral to the FBI. An Assistant U.S. Attorney, with knowledge from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, then worked with FBI agents to build a federal case, discovering more victims and drafting a 60-count indictment by May 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00023321.tif
This document is a conclusion from an OPR report detailing the investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by federal prosecutors. It outlines the Miami Herald's 2018 report, the subsequent OPR investigation into the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving R. Alexander Acosta, and the findings regarding victim rights violations. The report identifies five former USAO attorneys, including Acosta, as subjects of the investigation concerning their involvement in the NPA and victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00017974.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of Juan Alessi (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Alessi testifies that he met Jeffrey Epstein in early 1990 through a referral by Epstein's friend, Mr. Meister, while Alessi was working for Mr. Wexner's mother. Alessi describes his initial role as a self-contractor hired to dismantle and renovate Epstein's newly purchased home at 358 El Brillo Way in Palm Beach, Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00015625.jpg
This document is a second-floor architectural plan for the Epstein Residence at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida, dated April 4, 1994. It details proposed renovations and finishes for various rooms including guest rooms, bathrooms, a housekeeper's bedroom, and the master bedroom, along with instructions for roof terrace waterproofing and railing installations. The plan was prepared by Roger Wm. Sahli Architect and Michael A. Johnson Associates Architect.
DOJ-OGR-00001568.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 8, 2020. It formally lists and provides photographic exhibits of two properties owned by Epstein: an estate in Palm Beach, Florida, and a ranch in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00000800.jpg
This legal document outlines the U.S. Government's argument that Jeffrey Epstein attempted to influence potential witnesses after a critical Miami Herald report was published in late 2018. The government alleges Epstein paid a total of $350,000 to two 'potential co-conspirators,' identified as Individual I and Individual II, for whom he had previously secured protection in his 2007 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement. Individual II is specifically described as an employee who facilitated Epstein's sex trafficking of minors.
DOJ-OGR-00000790.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court filing (Document 32) from July 18, 2019, detailing the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines the charges of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking and sex trafficking of minors between 2002 and 2005 in New York and Florida. The text describes Epstein's method of paying victims cash for sex acts and paying them to recruit other underage girls, creating a 'vast network' of victims, some as young as 14.
DOJ-OGR-00000789.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, details arguments surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's bail. It outlines the government's allegations that Epstein's employees facilitated the trafficking of minors to his residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach. The document also presents the defense counsel's counterarguments, asserting that Epstein is not a flight risk due to his history of returning to the U.S. after extensive travel and his willingness to provide full financial disclosure to the Court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity