Palm Beach, Florida
LocationRelationship Network
Jeffrey Epstein Part 06 of 08.pdf
These documents consist of FBI internal communications and payment requests concerning the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein between 2006 and 2008. The records detail the opening of forfeiture sub-files, expenses for title searches and corporate records, and coordination with AUSA Antonia Barnes. Crucially, a memo dated September 18, 2008, explicitly states that the FBI would not pursue federal prosecution because Epstein was complying with his State of Florida plea deal and had 'provided information to the FBI as agreed upon,' leading to the closure of the forfeiture sub-file.
Jeffrey Epstein Part 03 of 08.pdf
This document is a compilation of FBI internal memos, administrative forms, and news clippings related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein between 2006 and 2011. It covers the FBI's monitoring of the state case, the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement, victim notification procedures, and the prosecution of Epstein's butler, Alfredo Rodriguez, for obstruction of justice. Significant portions include news articles detailing allegations by Virginia Roberts regarding Prince Andrew and the operations of the MC2 modeling agency.
Epstein_Part_18.pdf
This document is a compilation of FBI and police files related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, ranging from 2005 to 2008. It includes handwritten notes from victim interviews detailing interactions with Epstein involving money, travel, and massages, as well as official subpoenas for telecommunications data and MySpace profile printouts. The file also contains evidence receipts and deleted page information sheets indicating a significant portion of the record is withheld.
Epstein_Part_16.pdf
This document contains a 'Deleted Page Information Sheet' listing 515 pages withheld entirely from the release under FOIA exemptions (likely Grand Jury and Privacy). The visible pages contain copies of an FBI '1A Envelope' and FD-340 'Receipt for Property' forms dated April 19, 2008. These forms document the FBI's receipt of 'Subpoena Results for telephone #' under Case ID 31E-MM-108062 (the primary Epstein investigation code) by the Miami Field Office/Palm Beach Resident Agency.
20-3061_Documents.pdf
This document is the complete appellate record for case 20-3061, an interlocutory appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell against the United States. Maxwell appealed a District Court order denying her motion to modify a protective order, seeking permission to share confidential criminal discovery materials under seal with the judge in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) to challenge the government's acquisition of evidence. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that the protective order decision was not a final judgment or an appealable collateral order, and denied Maxwell's motion to consolidate the criminal appeal with the civil appeal.
036.pdf
This document is a transcript of a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein held on July 15, 2019, in the SDNY. The government argued for detention based on flight risk (citing wealth, foreign ties, and a fake passport found in a safe) and danger to the community, while the defense argued for release on house arrest, citing his 14-year record of appearing for court and lack of recent convictions. Two victims, Annie Farmer and Courtney Wild, spoke in court opposing bail.
032.pdf
This document is a Decision & Order by U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman denying Jeffrey Epstein's request for pretrial release and granting the Government's motion for remand (detention). The Court concludes that the Government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that Epstein poses a danger to the community, citing testimony from victims and evidence of potential witness tampering and non-compliance with sex offender registration. Additionally, the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that Epstein is a flight risk due to his vast wealth, international ties, and the potential for a lengthy prison sentence, and determines that the defense's proposed bail package is inadequate to mitigate these risks.
023.pdf
This July 16, 2019 letter from the DOJ to Judge Berman provides supplemental information for Jeffrey Epstein's detention hearing. It details suspicious wire transfers totaling $350,000 to two potential co-conspirators shortly after the release of Miami Herald articles in late 2018. The letter also reveals the seizure of a foreign passport with Epstein's photo but a false name, as well as over $70,000 in cash and 48 loose diamonds found in his Manhattan safe, arguing these facts support a serious risk of flight.
011.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard Berman arguing for the pretrial detention of Jeffrey Epstein. The Government outlines Epstein's extreme flight risk due to his wealth (over $500 million), international ties (Paris, US Virgin Islands), and access to private aircraft (noting over 20 international flights since 2018). It also details the danger he poses to the community, citing the recent discovery of lewd photos of minors in his home and a history of witness intimidation, including specific wire transfers made to potential witnesses following negative press coverage in late 2018.
011-02.pdf
This Palm Beach Police incident report from 2006 details an investigation into aggressive surveillance by private investigators hired by Jeffrey Epstein or his legal team. It documents a specific incident where a subject was run off the road by a PI in a green Chevy. The report also analyzes phone records showing a pattern where an individual (suspect) called a victim for intimidation purposes, and immediately afterward communicated with Epstein's assistant and a corporate number registered to Epstein's business address at 457 Madison Ave.
20250714161434468_24-1073_Maxwell_Opp.pdf
This document is a legal brief filed by the United States Solicitor General in July 2025 opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. The government argues that the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in Florida does not bar the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell, as the agreement was contractually limited to the Florida district and Maxwell was not a party to it. The brief details the history of the Epstein investigation, the terms of the NPA, and relevant legal precedents regarding the scope of plea agreements binding different US Attorney's Offices.
017-05.pdf
This document is an Omnibus Order from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida dated February 4, 2010, in the civil case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The Magistrate Judge rules on the Plaintiff's motions to compel answers to interrogatories, admissions, and production requests. The court upholds Epstein's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination regarding questions about his financial history, assets, and potential witnesses, but orders him to produce documents that are already known to the government (tax returns, passport, and documents provided to him during plea negotiations), ruling that these fall under the 'foregone conclusion' doctrine.
044.pdf
This document is a legal filing from May 2020 in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a letter from the Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Estate Executors are obstructing discovery by limiting it to a narrow time window in 2002 and refusing to answer questions fully. The attached Exhibit A contains the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, in which they identify specific staff members (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Lesley Groff) who worked at Epstein's New York home during late 2002, list various email accounts and phone numbers associated with Epstein, and identify Shoppers Travel, Inc. as his travel agency. No specific flight logs or aircraft manifests are included in the document.
001.pdf
This document is a legal complaint filed by Teresa Helm against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, alleging sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein and his co-conspirators. The complaint details Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network, previous legal proceedings, and his personal statements regarding his actions, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
073.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on November 28, 2009, by Plaintiff Carolyn M. Andriano (Jane Doe No. 2) in her civil case against Jeffrey Epstein. The filing opposes a motion by third-party witness Igor Zinoview—Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer since November 2005—who sought to avoid being deposed by claiming he had no knowledge of relevant facts. The Plaintiff argues that Zinoview must be deposed because he worked for Epstein during the active Palm Beach Police investigation (2005-2006) and likely possesses knowledge regarding activities at the Epstein residence, especially since Epstein himself invoked the Fifth Amendment.
011.pdf
This document is a Motion to Remand filed on August 18, 2008, by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The plaintiff seeks to move the case back to Florida state court, arguing that federal diversity jurisdiction is invalid because both the Plaintiff and Defendant Haley Robson are Florida citizens. The motion details allegations that Robson recruited the plaintiff (a minor at the time) for Epstein's sexual abuse scheme and argues that Robson is a legitimate defendant, not 'fraudulently joined' solely to prevent federal jurisdiction.
021.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Carolyn M. Andriano (Jane Doe No. 2) opposing a motion by third-party witness Igor Zinoview to avoid deposition. Zinoview, who worked as Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer starting in November 2005, claimed he had no relevant knowledge of Epstein's legal matters. The Plaintiff argues that Zinoview worked for Epstein during the police investigation period and likely has relevant observations, regardless of whether he discussed legal matters with Epstein.
011.pdf
Legal motion filed on August 11, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida, requesting to consolidate the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein with the lead case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein for discovery purposes. The document states that the case involves alleged sexual abuse in Palm Beach, Florida, in 2001. The motion was unopposed by the Defendant's counsel.
030.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Joinder' filed on June 8, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 join a motion for a no-contact order against Jeffrey Epstein. The filing alleges that Epstein's associate and recruiter, Hayley Robson, has been harassing victims Jane Does 4 and 7 through text messages and in-person threats while claiming to be financially supported by and cooperating with Epstein. The plaintiffs request a court order prohibiting Epstein from any direct or indirect contact with the victims.
086.pdf
This document is a response filed by Plaintiff Carolyn M. Andriano on November 28, 2009, opposing a motion by third-party witness Igor Zinoview to prevent his deposition. Zinoview, who worked as Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer starting in November 2005, claims he has no relevant knowledge of legal matters involving Epstein. The Plaintiff argues that because Zinoview worked for Epstein during the active police investigation (2005-2006), he likely possesses relevant information regarding activities at the Epstein residence, and that a complete bar on his deposition is legally unjustified.
036-01.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe 17 against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various corporate entities associated with him. The plaintiff alleges that she was a victim of a sex trafficking enterprise led by Epstein and facilitated by the defendant corporations, seeking damages under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. § 1595) and for common law battery. The document details the alleged scheme, the role of the corporate defendants in enabling the abuse, and includes an asset summary of Epstein's estate as an exhibit.
053.pdf
This document is a legal filing in the civil case Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke & Kahn. It includes a letter from Plaintiff's counsel arguing that the Epstein Estate executors are improperly limiting discovery to a 4-year period and refusing to produce documents regarding Epstein's broader sex-trafficking conspiracy. Attached as Exhibit A are the Defendants' supplemental responses to interrogatories, which list specific employees (including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and pilots like Larry Visoski), email accounts used by Epstein (specifically noting 'jeevacation@gmail.com' and 'jeeproject@yahoo.com'), and numerous phone numbers associated with his properties in New York, Palm Beach, New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands.
009.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff C.L. opposing Jeffrey Epstein's motion to dismiss Count III of her complaint. The core legal argument concerns whether the Adam Walsh Act (2006) can be applied retroactively to Epstein's conduct; the Plaintiff argues it provides a civil, non-punitive remedy and thus does not violate the Ex Post Facto clause. The document also graphically describes Epstein's 'systematic' child exploitation enterprise, involving at least three assistants who recruited, groomed, and paid minor girls, which Epstein sought to strike from the record.
001.pdf
This is a legal complaint filed against Jeffrey Epstein by a plaintiff identified as C.L. The complaint alleges sexual assault and abuse of a minor and details the defendant's ownership of a residence in Palm Beach, Florida, and his current citizenship in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
001.pdf
This document is a legal complaint filed by Juliette Bryant against the executors of Jeffrey Edward Epstein's estate. It details allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein, beginning when Bryant was 20 years old, and describes Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network and his previous legal actions and statements regarding his conduct.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity