Doe 1
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Filing | Filing of a civil case, Doe 1 v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| N/A | Filing | Filing of a civil case, Doe 1 v. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-08-03 | N/A | Scheduled unsealing of Doe 1 and Maxwell deposition transcripts (if no stay ordered). | New York, New York | View |
EFTA00018294.pdf
This document is a Memorandum & Order from Judge Loretta Preska dated July 29, 2020, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request to reconsider the unsealing of her deposition transcripts and those of 'Doe 1'. Maxwell argued that her recent arrest and indictment were new developments requiring secrecy, but the court ruled these risks were already considered ('plowed ground') and that she failed to raise these specific objections in a timely manner after her arrest. The court granted a brief stay until July 31, 2020, to allow Maxwell to appeal, with unsealing scheduled for August 3, 2020, absent further orders.
EFTA00017070.pdf
Judge Loretta Preska denied Ghislaine Maxwell's request to reconsider the unsealing of her deposition transcripts, ruling that her recent arrest was not a valid new ground for reconsideration as she had failed to raise it during the weeks prior to the court's original decision. The court noted that the potential for criminal charges had already been weighed in the original unsealing order. A short stay was granted until August 3, 2020, to allow Maxwell to appeal to the Court of Appeals before the documents are released.
DOJ-OGR-00015107.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 6, 2025, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Epstein and Maxwell's criminal scheme, advocating for the redaction of victims' names while opposing similar protection for third-party enablers. It references a July 6, 2025 Memorandum and several civil cases, asserting that transparency and accountability necessitate the release of information concerning individuals involved in sex trafficking.
DOJ-OGR-00000770.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of victim Annie Farmer by her counsel Sigrid S. McCawley, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing supports redacting victims' personal information for privacy but strongly opposes redacting the names of co-conspirators and enablers, asserting that their identities should be public to ensure accountability and justice. It references other civil lawsuits against entities like JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank as part of a broader effort to hold third parties involved in the sex-trafficking scheme accountable.
DOJ-OGR-00019323.jpg
A letter to Judge Loretta A. Preska from Laura A. Menninger regarding procedural requests for the unsealing of documents in the case involving Ms. Maxwell. The letter proposes amendments to the unsealing protocol to prevent errors, requests a 7-day window for appeals to the Second Circuit, and suggests a specific list of five docket entries for the next round of review.
DOJ-OGR-00019322.jpg
This document is a letter from Ms. Maxwell's legal counsel to Judge Loretta A. Preska requesting a temporary stay of the unsealing process and discussing procedural agreements. It outlines proposals to streamline the unsealing process, such as notifying non-parties simultaneously and shortening objection timelines for original parties, while also requesting a 15-page limit for future objections.
DOJ-OGR-00002941.jpg
This document is page 7 of 239 (internally numbered 'vi') from a legal filing, Document 204 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of cases, listing legal precedents with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The footer includes a Department of Justice document identifier, DOJ-OGR-00002941.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013409.jpg
This document is a printed webpage from the Palm Beach Daily News dated April 7, 2011, reporting on a motion filed by attorneys representing victims (Doe 1 and 2) to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. The motion argues the agreement is illegal because the government failed to notify victims as required by the Crime Victim Rights Act, allegedly to protect Epstein due to his political connections. The article includes comments from U.S. Attorney's Office spokesperson Alicia Valle denying CVRA violations because no federal charges were filed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity