DOJ-OGR-00019323.jpg

806 KB

Extraction Summary

7
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
5
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / letter to judge
File Size: 806 KB
Summary

A letter to Judge Loretta A. Preska from Laura A. Menninger regarding procedural requests for the unsealing of documents in the case involving Ms. Maxwell. The letter proposes amendments to the unsealing protocol to prevent errors, requests a 7-day window for appeals to the Second Circuit, and suggests a specific list of five docket entries for the next round of review.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Second Circuit
DOJ

Timeline (5 events)

Defendant’s Motion to Compel Responses
Plaintiff’s Brief in Support of Privilege
Defendant’s Motion to Compel Non-Privileged Documents
Sharon Churcher Motion to Quash Subpoena
Defendant’s Motion to Reopen Deposition of Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre

Relationships (3)

Key Quotes (3)

"we believe the Court’s ruling should specify which redactions it is accepting or rejecting at the time of ruling."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019323.jpg
Quote #1
"we request that the Court allow for the any objecting Non-Party or Original Party be given 7 days following any unseal order to apply for relief in the Second Circuit"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019323.jpg
Quote #2
"Given the Second Circuit’s stay concerning Ms. Maxwell and Doe 1’s deposition transcripts and materials that quote from them"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019323.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,305 characters)

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1100 Filed 08/10/20 Page 3 of 3
Honorable Loretta A. Preska
August 10, 2020
Page 3
providing the Notice to Doe 1 at the new address for any future pleadings that implicate his or her deposition, which is currently subject to the Second Circuit’s stay.
Third, to prevent against some of the errors that occurred during the last round of unsealings, we request that the Protocol be amended to require the Responding Original Party who proposes unsealing to supply with their Response a proposed unredacted set of the pleadings at issue, for the Court’s consideration and for the Objecting Original Party or Non-Party to have the right of reply. Preparing those redactions after the fact allows much ambiguity into the Court’s ruling and we believe the Court’s ruling should specify which redactions it is accepting or rejecting at the time of ruling.
Finally, we request that the Court allow for the any objecting Non-Party or Original Party be given 7 days following any unseal order to apply for relief in the Second Circuit from the order prior to the documents being released.
Proposed Next Set of Docket Entries for Review:
Given the Second Circuit’s stay concerning Ms. Maxwell and Doe 1’s deposition transcripts and materials that quote from them, we propose that the Court deviate from the Doe 1 and 2 chronology (given that Doe 1’s deposition is sprinkled throughout those motions) and instead take the following five decided motions and their related pleadings. This list represents the first five chronological decided motions that (a) have sealed or redacted materials and (b) do not have attached or quote from documents subject to the stay. They are:
• 75 – Defendant’s Motion to Compel Responses to Defendant’s First Set of Discovery Responses to Plaintiff
• 139 – Plaintiff’s Brief in Support of the Privilege Claimed for In Camera Submission
• 155 – Defendant’s Motion to Compel Non-Privileged Documents
• 215 – Sharon Churcher Motion to Quash Subpoena
• 231 – Defendant’s Motion to Reopen Deposition of Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre
Counsel for Ms. Maxwell is available for a telephone conference to discuss any of the foregoing, should the Court desire.
Respectfully submitted,
Laura A. Menninger
CC: Counsel of Record via ECF
DOJ-OGR-00019323

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document