Clark
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Decision in United States v. Clark regarding temporary release. | Kansas | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Court decision in United States v. Clark. | Kansas | View |
| 1991-01-01 | Legal decision | The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Clark v. Ricketts. | 9th Cir. | View |
| 1933-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case cited: Clark v. United States, 289 U.S. 1 (1933). | N/A | View |
EFTA00033647.pdf
This document consists of the Daily Lieutenant's Logs for the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York for July 28 and July 29, 2019. It details operational issues such as broken fire alarm and PA systems, inmate counts, and movements to and from medical facilities. Crucially, it records the status of inmate Jeffrey Epstein, listing him on 'Psych Obs' on July 28 and the morning of July 29, but changing his status to 'Suicide Watch' by the evening of July 29, noting in both instances that he had an 'inmate companion'.
DOJ-OGR-00000928.jpg
This page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) argues for the temporary release of a defendant (likely Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the case number context) by citing legal precedents established during the COVID-19 pandemic. It references *United States v. Clark* and *United States v. Robertson* to establish that courts have granted release under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) when incarceration impedes the defendant's ability to prepare their defense. A footnote notes that the 10th Circuit stayed the release order in the *Robertson* case pending appeal.
DOJ-OGR-00015589.jpg
This document is a photograph, designated as Government Exhibit 250-R, showing a collection of books on a shelf. The books primarily cover topics of literary criticism, philosophy, and myth, with authors including William K. Wimsatt, Jr., Cleanth Brooks, William Empson, and David R. Clark. The image is marked with a Department of Justice identifier, suggesting it is evidence in a legal case.
DOJ-OGR-00021746.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 87, Case 22-1426) dated July 27, 2023. It contains a Table of Authorities listing various legal precedents (cases) and the page numbers on which they appear in the full brief. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00021746).
DOJ-OGR-00009005.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 613) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (cases) cited in the main document, ranging from 1933 to 2022. Notably, it cites 'Brown v. Maxwell' (2019), a case directly involving the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00019846.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Case 21-58) dated April 1, 2021. It presents legal arguments for temporary release under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), citing the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on a defendant's ability to communicate with counsel and prepare a defense. The text analyzes case precedents *United States v. Clark*, *Stephens*, and *United States v. Robertson*, highlighting that even defendants with serious charges (like Robertson) were released to prepare for trial during the pandemic.
DOJ-OGR-00009696.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal document filed on March 11, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It lists numerous legal cases, with decision dates ranging from 1933 to 2022, which are cited as legal precedent in the main filing. Each entry includes the case name, citation, and the page number(s) where it is referenced in the document.
DOJ-OGR-00005400.jpg
This legal document argues that there is no absolute right for an accused person to know a witness's true name and address, citing various legal precedents and the Crime Victims' Rights Act. It emphasizes the strong public interest in protecting the identities of victims, particularly in sex abuse cases, to ensure their dignity, privacy, and safety, and to encourage future victims to report crimes. The document provides multiple examples of cases where courts have permitted victims, including minors, to testify using pseudonyms or partial names.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity