DOJ-OGR-00019846.jpg

628 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (appellate brief/motion)
File Size: 628 KB
Summary

This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Case 21-58) dated April 1, 2021. It presents legal arguments for temporary release under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), citing the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on a defendant's ability to communicate with counsel and prepare a defense. The text analyzes case precedents *United States v. Clark*, *Stephens*, and *United States v. Robertson*, highlighting that even defendants with serious charges (like Robertson) were released to prepare for trial during the pandemic.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Clark Defendant in cited case
Cited in United States v. Clark regarding temporary release motions.
Stephens Defendant in cited case
Cited regarding obstacles posed by the public health crisis to defense preparation.
Robertson Defendant in cited case
Subject of United States v. Robertson; charged with a shooting, bond violation, and gun/drug record, yet released due...

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States District Court for the District of Kansas
Issued opinion in US v. Clark (D. Kan.).
United States District Court for the District of New Mexico
Issued opinion in US v. Robertson (D.N.M.).
10th Circuit Court of Appeals
Mentioned in footnote as having stayed the Robertson order.
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00019846).

Timeline (2 events)

2020
Court decision in United States v. Clark.
Kansas
2021-02-06
Court decision in United States v. Robertson.
New Mexico

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of Clark case.
Location of Robertson case.

Key Quotes (3)

"[m]ost courts addressing a motion for temporary release under §3142(i) have done so in the context of evaluating the necessity of the defendant assisting with preparing his or her defense"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019846.jpg
Quote #1
"the obstacles the current public health crisis poses to the preparation of the Defendant's defense constitute a compelling reason under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019846.jpg
Quote #2
"Mr. Robertson's release is necessary for the preparation of his trial defense under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019846.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,358 characters)

Case 21-58, Document 39-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page18 of 31
In United States v. Clark, 448 F. Supp. 3d 1152, 1155 (D. Kan.
2020), the court emphasized that "[m]ost courts addressing a motion for
temporary release under §3142(i) have done so in the context of
evaluating the necessity of the defendant assisting with preparing his
or her defense ... This extends to the current COVID-19 pandemic
[because of] the pandemic's impact on counsel's difficulties
communicating with the defendant." See, e.g., Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d
at 65-67 (finding "the obstacles the current public health crisis poses to
the preparation of the Defendant's defense constitute a compelling
reason under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)"); United States v. Robertson, 17-Cr-
2949, Doc. 306 (D.N.M. February 6, 2021).7
The defendant in Robertson was charged with "frightening
allegations" involving a shooting. He had previously violated bond. And
he had a criminal record involving guns and drugs. But the court
ordered him released because of his inability to prepare for trial while
in custody during the pandemic:
Mr. Robertson's release is necessary for the preparation of his trial
defense under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i). That section allows a judicial
__________________
7 The 10th Circuit has stayed the Robertson order while it considers the
government's appeal.
16
DOJ-OGR-00019846

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document