New York Residence
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00020739.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on March 29, 2021. It outlines allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that between 1994 and 2004, she facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, sometimes participating in the abuse herself. The document lists four specific locations where victims were groomed and abused: Epstein's residences in Manhattan, Palm Beach, and Santa Fe, as well as Maxwell's residence in London.
DOJ-OGR-00016871.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Healy. The questioning establishes that Healy never visited Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house, only visited the New York residence to drop off documents without entering, visited Zorro Ranch exactly once, and never flew on Epstein's private planes or traveled with him.
DOJ-OGR-00016205.jpg
This document is a transcript of testimony from an individual named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski describes the layout of Mr. Epstein's multi-story New York residence and details the flight logistics for arriving in the area between 1994 and 2004. He explains that they used Teterboro Airport until 2000, after which they switched to Newark or JFK Airport because Mr. Epstein had purchased a Boeing 727 that was too heavy for Teterboro.
DOJ-OGR-00002305(1).jpg
This document is page 6 of a legal defense filing (Document 122) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated January 25, 2021. The defense argues that Counts One and Three of the indictment are 'clones' because they share identical participants (Epstein and Maxwell), time periods (1994-1997), and operations (enticing minors to travel for abuse). The text specifically details an allegation regarding 'Minor Victim-1' being transported from Florida to New York for sexual abuse at Epstein's New York residence.
DOJ-OGR-00019485.jpg
This page of an indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell details specific allegations of abuse and recruitment. It charges that in 1996, Maxwell personally gave an unsolicited massage to a topless minor in New Mexico, and between 1994-1995, encouraged another minor to massage Jeffrey Epstein in London knowing abuse would occur. It also introduces 'Count Four,' charging Maxwell with the transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00019482.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment against an individual named MAXWELL, filed on July 8, 2020. It outlines specific allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation of three unnamed minors (Victim-1, Victim-2, and Victim-3) between 1994 and 1997. The alleged crimes, which involved a co-conspirator named Epstein, took place in various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London, England.
DOJ-OGR-00019476.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) outlines charges against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding her role in facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of minors between 1994 and 1997. It details specific acts of abuse and identifies Epstein's 'New York Residence' on the Upper East Side of Manhattan as a location where grooming and abuse occurred, including a photograph of the building.
DOJ-OGR-00019218.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 2, 2020. It details specific allegations of abuse, including Maxwell providing a massage to "Minor Victim-2" in 1996 and encouraging "Minor Victim-3" to massage Epstein between 1994-1995 with knowledge of his abusive intent. The document also outlines Count Four, charging Maxwell with the transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity between 1994 and 1997.
DOJ-OGR-00019215.jpg
This page from a legal indictment, filed on July 2, 2020, details several allegations against an individual named MAXWELL. The charges state that between 1994 and 1997, MAXWELL, in concert with Epstein, engaged in sexual abuse of three minors (Minor Victim-1, -2, and -3) across multiple locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London. The specific allegations include participating in group sexual encounters, enticing a minor to travel for sexual abuse, and facilitating sexual abuse by encouraging a minor to provide massages to Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00019209.jpg
This document is page 6 of 19 from a legal filing (Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ) dated July 2, 2020. It outlines allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell for facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's access to minor victims between 1994 and 1997. The page specifically describes Epstein's 'New York Residence' on the Upper East Side of Manhattan as a location where grooming and abuse occurred and includes a photograph of the building.
DOJ-OGR-00019185.jpg
This document is page 12 of a legal indictment filed on July 2, 2020, detailing specific allegations against an individual named MAXWELL. The charges describe her involvement with Epstein in the sexual abuse and exploitation of three minors between 1994 and 1997. The alleged criminal acts, including group sexual encounters and enticement to travel for sex acts, occurred in New York, Florida, and London, England.
DOJ-OGR-00019179.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ) filed on July 2, 2020. It outlines allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that between 1994 and 1997 she facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's access to minor victims for abuse. It specifically identifies Epstein's multi-story private residence on the Upper East Side of Manhattan as a location where grooming and abuse occurred, accompanied by a photograph of the building.
DOJ-OGR-00019113.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from the redirect examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Comey questions Rodgers, who denies letting his daughter massage Jeffrey Epstein and denies receiving an $18.3 million payment from him. Rodgers also testifies about his knowledge of Epstein's properties, estimating the New York residence was acquired around 1996 and acknowledging previous questions about renovations at the Florida residence.
DOJ-OGR-00016778.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal debate over the execution of a search at a New York residence. Attorneys argue about the specific roles of Special Agent Maguire and Agent Young, particularly concerning who was the overall search leader and who was responsible for extracting files from electronic devices. The judge actively questions the attorneys to clarify these disputed facts.
DOJ-OGR-00008958.jpg
This legal document is a filing from the defense in the case against Epstein, arguing that their ability to challenge a witness named Jane's testimony was hampered. The defense claims that unavailable property records and the deaths of key witnesses, specifically architects Alberto Pinto and Roger Salhi, prevented them from proving that Epstein's properties were not constructed or occupied at the times Jane recalled, which would have cast doubt on her testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00010398.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, defends the court's decision to reject the defendant's proposed jury instructions. The court argues the requested instructions were unresponsive, redundant, and legally inaccurate, particularly the claim that sexual activity outside New York could not form the basis for the charges. The document asserts that the existing jury charge correctly focused the inquiry on the violation of New York Penal Law Section 130.55, specifically concerning the overt act of transporting the victim, Jane, from Florida to New York for the purpose of sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00010392.jpg
This document is page 26 of a court filing from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 29, 2022. It discusses specific jury instructions regarding witnesses 'Jane,' 'Kate,' and 'Annie,' clarifying jurisdictional boundaries (New York vs. New Mexico) and age of consent issues relative to New York Penal Law Section 130.55. The text explains that while testimony from Kate (who was over 17) and Annie (whose incidents occurred in NM) could not be used as the sole basis for conviction on specific counts, it was admissible to establish the Defendant's intent regarding the transport of minors.
DOJ-OGR-00009603.jpg
This document is a page from a government legal filing in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 25, 2022. The text argues against the defense's claims regarding missing witnesses (Sally Markham, Fontanilla) and disputes the origin of the 'household manual' (Gov Ex 606), citing email evidence (Gov Ex 424) that proves Maxwell was involved in its creation alongside Markham, rather than it being solely the work of 'the Countess.' The prosecution asserts that the absence of these witnesses did not prejudice the defendant's ability to defend herself or impact the facts of the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014622.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 10, 2022, details overt acts from an indictment related to conspiracy charges. It alleges that between 1994 and 2002, Maxwell, along with co-conspirator Epstein, engaged in sexual abuse and trafficking of minors identified as Jane, Annie, and Carolyn. The alleged acts occurred in New York, Florida, and New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00011760.jpg
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness named Visoski. Visoski describes the layout of Mr. Epstein's multi-story New York residence and details his flight operations between 1994 and 2004, explaining a shift from Teterboro Airport to Newark or JFK Airport after 2000. The change was necessitated by Mr. Epstein's purchase of a Boeing 727, which was too heavy to land at Teterboro.
DOJ-OGR-00002855.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on March 29, 2021. It details specific allegations of Maxwell facilitating the sexual abuse of three unnamed minors (Victim-2, Victim-3, and Victim-4) for Jeffrey Epstein between 1994 and 2002. The alleged incidents occurred in various locations, including New Mexico, London, and Florida, and form the basis for Count Two of the indictment, 'Enticement of a Minor to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts'.
DOJ-OGR-00002846.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 29, 2021. It outlines allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that between 1994 and 2004, she facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, sometimes participating in the abuse herself. The document lists four specific locations where victims were groomed and abused: Epstein's properties in New York, Palm Beach, and Santa Fe, as well as Maxwell's residence in London.
DOJ-OGR-00008756.jpg
This document is a page from the jury instructions in the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on December 19, 2021. It outlines 'Instruction No. 36' regarding the 'overt act' requirement for conspiracy charges. The text explicitly lists alleged overt acts involving Maxwell and Epstein, including group sexual encounters with a minor ('Jane'), enticing a minor to travel for sexual abuse, and an unsolicited massage given by Maxwell to 'Annie' in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00008670.jpg
This document is a page from jury instructions (Instruction No. 36) filed on December 18, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the 'Third Element' of conspiracy, requiring an 'overt act,' and lists specific alleged acts including group sexual encounters involving Maxwell, Epstein, and a minor named Jane (1994-1997), an unsolicited massage given by Maxwell to Annie in New Mexico (1996), and travel invitations to a minor named Carolyn (2001-2002).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019068.jpg
This document is page 3 of an FBI FD-302 interview report dated December 13, 2006. The interviewee is a former chef for Jeffrey Epstein who worked at the NYC and Palm Beach residences. The report details the interviewee's knowledge of Epstein's properties (including the USVI island and the NYC home described as a former school), staff (including a Russian worker and an assistant), and observations regarding teenage girls, though the interviewee denies witnessing inappropriate behavior.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity