| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-13 | N/A | Court Argument | Courtroom 1703, Thurgood Ma... | View |
A court argument calendar for October 13, 2020, at the Thurgood Marshall US Courthouse in New York. The schedule lists two cases involving Ghislaine Maxwell: one civil case involving Julie Brown and the Miami Herald (misspelled 'Hearld'), and one case involving the United States of America. The arguments are to be heard by a panel of judges consisting of Cabranes, Pooler, and Raggi.
This document is an email dated October 8, 2020, likely from the U.S. Attorney's Office, summarizing upcoming oral arguments before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It highlights the case 'United States v. Maxwell' (referring to Ghislaine Maxwell), scheduled for October 13, 2020, concerning an appeal regarding a protective order. The email also lists arguments for 'Farhane v. United States' and 'United States v. Louis McIntosh'.
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on April 1, 2021, where a defense attorney argues for their client's pretrial release. The attorney contends that the government has the unwavering burden to prove the client is a flight risk and has failed to do so, citing precedent from the Supreme Court and a Second Circuit case written by Judge Raggi. The attorney also informs the court that they have proactively prepared a bail package for consideration, subject to verification by Pretrial Services.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020. An attorney is arguing for their client's pretrial release, citing precedent from the Supreme Court and the Second Circuit to assert that the burden of proof lies with the government to demonstrate the client is a flight risk. The attorney criticizes the government for not meeting this burden and introduces a prepared bail package for the judge's consideration.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity