EFTA00018504.pdf
51.5 KB
Extraction Summary
11
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email / internal memo
File Size:
51.5 KB
Summary
This document is an email dated October 8, 2020, likely from the U.S. Attorney's Office, summarizing upcoming oral arguments before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It highlights the case 'United States v. Maxwell' (referring to Ghislaine Maxwell), scheduled for October 13, 2020, concerning an appeal regarding a protective order. The email also lists arguments for 'Farhane v. United States' and 'United States v. Louis McIntosh'.
People (11)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the case 'United States v. Maxwell' listed for oral argument regarding a protective order.
|
| Cabranes | Judge |
Second Circuit Judge presiding over United States v. Maxwell.
|
| Pooler | Judge |
Second Circuit Judge presiding over United States v. Maxwell.
|
| Raggi | Judge |
Second Circuit Judge presiding over United States v. Maxwell.
|
| Winter | Judge |
Second Circuit Judge presiding over Farhane v. United States.
|
| Walker | Judge |
Second Circuit Judge presiding over Farhane v. United States and United States v. Louis McIntosh.
|
| Menashi | Judge |
Second Circuit Judge presiding over Farhane v. United States.
|
| Lohier | Judge |
Second Circuit Judge presiding over United States v. Louis McIntosh.
|
| Stanceu | Judge |
Judge presiding over United States v. Louis McIntosh.
|
| Farhane | Defendant |
Subject of the case 'Farhane v. United States'.
|
| Louis McIntosh | Defendant |
Subject of the case 'United States v. Louis McIntosh'.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
Court where the oral arguments are scheduled.
|
|
| The Office |
Likely the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY or similar), sending the schedule of their upcoming arguments.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2020-10-13
Oral argument for United States v. Maxwell
Second Circuit (via Phone/Zoom)
Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant)
Judges Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi
2020-10-15
Oral argument for United States v. Louis McIntosh
Second Circuit (via Phone/Zoom)
Louis McIntosh
Judges Walker, Lohier, Stanceu
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction for the appeals.
|
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,658 characters)
From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Subject: Second Circuit oral arguments next week (October 12-16, 2020)
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 21:21:33 +0000
To: [Redacted]
Subject: Second Circuit oral arguments next week (October 12-16, 2020)
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 21:21:33 +0000
The Office has three oral arguments in criminal cases scheduled before the Second Circuit next week. They will be argued by phone/zoom, and you can listen to the livestream at this link. Also, you can click on the hyperlinks below to access our briefs.
Tuesday, October 13, 2020
(Winter, Walker, Menashi)
Farhane v. United States
- [Redacted] arguing
- Motion for certificate of appealability: denial of Section 2255 motion raising ineffective of assistance of counsel claim based on failure to advise about possibility of denaturalization
- First on A calendar; scheduled to start at 10:00 am
(Winter, Walker, Menashi)
Farhane v. United States
- [Redacted] arguing
- Motion for certificate of appealability: denial of Section 2255 motion raising ineffective of assistance of counsel claim based on failure to advise about possibility of denaturalization
- First on A calendar; scheduled to start at 10:00 am
(Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi)
United States v. Maxwell
- [Redacted] arguing
- Pre-trial appeal: whether district court’s order denying D’s motion to modify protective order is subject to interlocutory appeal; whether district court abused its discretion in denying the motion
- Second on B calendar; scheduled to start at 2:24 pm
United States v. Maxwell
- [Redacted] arguing
- Pre-trial appeal: whether district court’s order denying D’s motion to modify protective order is subject to interlocutory appeal; whether district court abused its discretion in denying the motion
- Second on B calendar; scheduled to start at 2:24 pm
Thursday, October 15, 2020
(Walker, Lohier, Stanceu)
United States v. Louis McIntosh (here and here)
- [Redacted] arguing
- Appeal from trial and our cross-appeal from partial grant of Rule 29 motion: sufficiency of the evidence of Hobbs Act robbery counts (intent to commit robbery, interstate commerce, and venue); Davis challenge to Section 924(c) conviction (attempted Hobbs Act robbery); Rehaif challenge to jury instructions; whether the Rule 32.2 deadline for entry of a preliminary order of forfeiture is jurisdictional
- First on calendar; scheduled to start at 10:00 am
(Walker, Lohier, Stanceu)
United States v. Louis McIntosh (here and here)
- [Redacted] arguing
- Appeal from trial and our cross-appeal from partial grant of Rule 29 motion: sufficiency of the evidence of Hobbs Act robbery counts (intent to commit robbery, interstate commerce, and venue); Davis challenge to Section 924(c) conviction (attempted Hobbs Act robbery); Rehaif challenge to jury instructions; whether the Rule 32.2 deadline for entry of a preliminary order of forfeiture is jurisdictional
- First on calendar; scheduled to start at 10:00 am
EFTA00018504
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document