Noam Chomsky
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondent |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Joscha Bach
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Ehud Barak
|
Intellectual interest |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Lawrence Krauss
|
Professional intellectual |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Lawrence Krauss
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E. (Epstein)
|
Correspondents |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Valeria Chomsky
|
Familial likely |
6
|
1 | |
|
location
Israel
|
Critic |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Intellectual correspondence |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lawrence Krauss
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Intellectual social |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Author (Dershowitz)
|
Adversarial intellectual rivals |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Faurisson
|
Defender subject |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Valeria Chomsky
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Interest connection |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Correspondent advisor |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Joscha Bach
|
Debaters intellectual adversaries |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Descartes
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Faurisson
|
Defender supporter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Woody Allen
|
Proposed panelists |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The Author challenges Chomsky to a public debate regarding anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recurring 'lively interchanges' and 'intellectual exchange and stimulation' where Jeffrey was an ... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | General reference to 'lively interchanges' and intellectual exchanges where Jeffrey was an active... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The document refers to regular 'lively interchanges' and 'intellectual exchange and stimulation' ... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Phone call from Noam Chomsky and Lula (from prison) to the redacted sender | Prison (Origin) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filming of [REDACTED] and Noam Chomsky | Arizona (Implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Author attended Camp Massad. | Camp Massad | View |
| 2025-01-22 | N/A | Valeria and Noam scheduled to leave Cambridge for Arizona. | Cambridge to Arizona | View |
| 2019-05-12 | N/A | Trip to Arizona to see Noam Chomsky | Arizona | View |
| 2019-02-10 | N/A | Proposed meeting between [Redacted] and Noam Chomsky | Tucson | View |
| 2016-12-26 | N/A | An email exchange occurred between Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein, discussing US politics (Dona... | N/A | View |
| 2016-11-13 | N/A | Email exchange discussing Donald Trump's election victory. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2016-11-13 | N/A | Email exchange regarding the 2016 US Presidential Election results. | N/A | View |
| 2016-07-10 | N/A | A discussion or meeting where Joscha Bach presented an argument that 'triggered' Noam Chomsky. Jo... | Unknown | View |
| 2016-07-09 | N/A | A gathering or meeting where Joscha Bach debated Noam Chomsky. | Unknown (implied physical m... | View |
| 2015-08-01 | N/A | Invitation to speak at Parliament (declined by Chomsky) | Parliament | View |
| 2015-08-01 | N/A | Proposed visit to New York or New Mexico | New York or New Mexico | View |
| 0009-07-01 | N/A | Meeting or gathering involving Joscha Bach, Jeffrey Epstein, and Noam Chomsky. | Unknown | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025961.jpg
This document is a transcript of a conversation (likely email) between two individuals discussing controversial theories of evolutionary psychology, race, and gender. The exchange speculates on genetic differences between races (Black, European, Chinese, Jewish) regarding cognitive vs. motor development, and theorizes that women are biologically less interested in math and computer science due to motivational reward systems. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025961', indicating it is part of a congressional investigation release.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025955.jpg
A House Oversight document containing a transcript of a conversation or email exchange between two individuals. The dialogue covers controversial topics including evolutionary psychology, alleged gender differences in cognitive motivation (claiming women find abstract systems boring), racial differences in IQ and authority (comparing Chinese and Jewish populations), and the structure of music as a reflection of racial learning processes. One participant suggests climate change may be a positive mechanism for population control.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025951.jpg
In this email from July 2016, cognitive scientist Joscha Bach writes to Jeffrey Epstein to apologize for his behavior during a debate with Noam Chomsky earlier that day, thanking Epstein for his support. Bach details his disagreements with Chomsky's linguistic theories and critiques Joi Ito's communication style, describing Ito as unoriginal but politically savvy. The email cuts off while Bach is discussing racial differences in child motor development.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025949.jpg
An email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein dated July 23, 2016. The correspondence discusses controversial theories regarding neuroscience and genetics, specifically linking them to racial differences in cognitive vs. motor development, gender differences in interest in abstract systems vs. social relations, and cultural differences regarding authority between Chinese and Jewish populations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025901.jpg
An email from Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E./jeevacation) to Noam Chomsky dated August 5, 2015. Epstein advises Chomsky to only travel to Greece if he feels well, citing a recent incident where Epstein sent his private plane to Athens to transport another 'lefty friend' back to New York to see a 'Jew doctor.' The document contains repeated confidentiality disclaimers for 'JEE' and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025899.jpg
An email chain between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and Noam Chomsky from August 2015. Epstein initiates the exchange with comments on mathematical models ('difference of cubes') and asks if Chomsky has written about the Iran deal. Chomsky replies with a lengthy, critical analysis of the Iran deal, characterizing the US as the 'greatest threat to world peace' and criticizing US/Israeli policy and media coverage.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025898.jpg
An email thread from August 2015 between Ehud Barak and Jeffrey Epstein. Barak discusses a recent email from Noam Chomsky (forwarded by Epstein), comments on Israeli politics ('BB' vs Obama), and discusses 'Deep Learning' and math. Barak mentions having enjoyed staying at '62nd' (Epstein's NYC home), outlines his schedule for working on a biography in NY, and inquires if Epstein will be in New Mexico (NM) so he can visit.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025896.jpg
An email from Jeffrey Epstein to Noam Chomsky dated August 5, 2015. Epstein advises Chomsky only to travel to Greece if he feels well, citing a recent incident where Epstein had to send his private plane to Athens to retrieve another 'lefty friend' for medical treatment in New York. The document contains standard legal disclaimers and a House Oversight Bates number.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025895.jpg
An email thread from August 2015 between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and Noam Chomsky. They discuss scientific theories regarding evolution, algorithms, and behavioral science, with Epstein drawing analogies to ant behavior. The exchange includes Epstein offering Chomsky the use of his New York apartment or a return visit to New Mexico, which Chomsky politely deflects.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025894.jpg
An email exchange from August 7, 2015, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and Noam Chomsky. Epstein comments on a mathematical model involving the 'difference of cubes' and asks if Chomsky has written about the Iran deal. Chomsky responds with a lengthy, critical analysis of the Iran nuclear deal, US foreign policy, and media bias, comparing the US political climate to a 'lunatic asylum.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025893.jpg
An email chain from August 2015 between Ehud Barak and Jeffrey Epstein. Barak discusses political friction between 'BB' (Netanyahu) and Obama, comments on Noam Chomsky and 'deep learning,' and corrects a previous mention of where he stayed (changing 62nd to 66th). Barak also inquires about visiting Epstein in New Mexico later that month.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025652.jpg
This document is an email thread from September 10, 2015, initiated by physicist Lawrence Krauss, sending a New Yorker article about militant atheism to Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.' and email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'). Chomsky replies with a lengthy philosophical argument against ridiculing religious dogma, suggesting secular dogmas (like nationalism) are more dangerous, and comments on the 'Davis' case (likely Kim Davis). The thread concludes at the top with a brief reply, likely from Epstein, stating a belief that religion plays a positive role in many lives.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025641.jpg
An email sent on September 10, 2015, from physicist Lawrence Krauss to Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein (via the alias Jeffrey E. / jeevacation@gmail.com). Krauss shares a link to a New Yorker article titled 'All Scientists Should Be Militant Atheists' with the subject line 'an article you may both hate. or like.' The document includes a legal disclaimer at the bottom asserting the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey Epstein).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025640.jpg
This document is an email thread from September 10, 2015, involving Jeffrey Epstein, Lawrence Krauss, and Noam Chomsky. The discussion centers on philosophy, specifically the dangers of religious versus secular fanaticism/dogma, with Chomsky providing a lengthy analysis. Notably, the top of the thread contains a message, likely from Epstein to Krauss, suggesting, 'you can invite depp to visit us when you are in the caribean,' implying a connection to actor Johnny Depp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025637.jpg
An email thread from September 2015 initiated by Lawrence Krauss, sending a New Yorker article about militant atheism to both Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com). Chomsky replies with a detailed philosophical rebuttal regarding the use of ridicule against religious and secular dogmas, while also commenting on 'American exceptionalism,' 'Obama's mass murder campaign,' and the controversy surrounding Kim Davis. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032365.jpg
An email thread from November 13, 2016, between Valeria Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com), with Noam Chomsky CC'd. Following the 2016 election, Epstein notes 'we called it,' and Valeria asks if Epstein can arrange a meeting between Noam Chomsky and the President-elect (Trump), suggesting Trump could use Noam's advice. Valeria also jokingly requests a job as a political analyst in the White House.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032365.jpg
An email chain from November 13, 2016, between Valeria Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com), with Noam Chomsky CC'd. Following Donald Trump's election victory, Epstein writes 'we called it,' and Valeria responds by asking if Epstein can arrange for Trump ('a guy') to talk to Noam Chomsky, suggesting Trump could use Noam's advice. Valeria also jokes about wanting a job as a political analyst in the White House.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016373.jpg
The text discusses the philosophical and psychological debate between bottom-up learning (association and pattern detection) and top-down learning (using abstract concepts and hypotheses). It illustrates these concepts using the analogy of filtering spam emails, contrasting machine learning pattern recognition with human reasoning based on background knowledge.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030328.jpg
This document is an email chain from December 26, 2016, between Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com), with Valeria Chomsky CC'd. They discuss their mutual disdain for Donald Trump, share an anecdote about Tony Blair in Saudi Arabia, and engage in a complex academic discussion about linguistics, specifically the concept of using 'fields' to define meaning. The document is marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030328', indicating it is part of a collection from a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022448.jpg
This document is a page of testimonials and positive feedback for the publication 'Inference: International Review of Science' from several prominent academics, including Noam Chomsky. The Bates number 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022448' indicates this document was part of a larger set produced for a U.S. House of Representatives Oversight Committee investigation. The journal 'Inference' has been publicly reported as being funded by Jeffrey Epstein, which provides the context for this document's inclusion in Epstein-related materials.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022406.jpg
This document is an undated personal statement by Noam Chomsky regarding his relationship with a person named 'Jeffrey' (contextually Jeffrey Epstein). Chomsky praises Jeffrey's intellectual curiosity and knowledge, describing him as a valued friend and source of intellectual stimulation. The document includes the Bates number 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022406', indicating it is likely part of a collection from a U.S. House of Representatives committee.
Character statement about Jeffrey
A positive personal statement describing Jeffrey's intellectual qualities and the author's friendship with him.
Intellectual exchange
The document mentions 'More lively interchanges' and 'intellectual exchange and stimulation' in which Jeffrey was an 'active participant'.
Defense of Faurisson
Stating he sees no anti-Semitic implications in the denial of gas chambers.
Foreword to Faurisson's book
Chomsky wrote an essay used as a foreword to Faurisson's book.
Defense of Faurisson
Characterized Faurisson's work as findings based on extensive historical research.
Refusal to debate
Claiming nobody believes there is an anti-Semitic connotation to Holocaust denial.
No Subject
Provided three separate quotes calling the journal fascinating and expressing thanks for receiving it.
No Subject
Provided three separate quotes calling the journal fascinating and expressing thanks for receiving it.
Character testimonial for Jeffrey
A positive testimonial about Jeffrey's intellectual qualities, curiosity, and character, describing him as a valued friend and source of intellectual stimulation.
No Subject
Chomsky responds to Epstein's linguistic query, suggesting the closest concept is an 'array of meaning postulates' in Carnap's sense, which Jerry Fodor has explored. He notes it is multidimensional but not a 'field'.
No Subject
Epstein wishes Chomsky 'happy chanukah' and initiates a linguistic discussion, proposing a model that uses 'fields' instead of definitions, similar to a magnetic field, based on context.
Re:
Chomsky responds to Epstein, commenting on Trump's ghost-writer, relaying an anecdote about Tony Blair in Saudi Arabia, acknowledging Epstein's prediction about Trump avoiding the White House, and continuing a discussion on linguistics and 'field models'.
No Subject
Epstein quotes 'one of donalds closet people' and makes a derisive comment that Trump has written three books, making him one of the few people who has written more books than he has read.
No Subject
Chomsky responds to Epstein's linguistic query, suggesting the closest concept is an 'array of meaning postulates' in Carnap's sense, which Jerry Fodor has explored. He notes it is multidimensional but not a 'field'.
No Subject
Epstein wishes Chomsky 'happy chanukah' and initiates a linguistic discussion, proposing a model that uses 'fields' instead of definitions, similar to a magnetic field, based on context.
Re:
Chomsky responds to Epstein, commenting on Trump's ghost-writer, relaying an anecdote about Tony Blair in Saudi Arabia, acknowledging Epstein's prediction about Trump avoiding the White House, and continuing a discussion on linguistics and 'field models'.
No Subject
Epstein quotes 'one of donalds closet people' and makes a derisive comment that Trump has written three books, making him one of the few people who has written more books than he has read.
Re:
Chomsky writes: 'I presume that the software just guides the hardware. Don't see how that changes the considerations.'
Unknown/Blank
Epstein asks why we wouldn't expect auditory grammar to be a mutation of the visual grammar system, noting children aren't taught to see.
Re:
Chomsky explains the differences between vision (input system) and language (internal capacity/system of knowledge), noting they look wholly different.
Re:
Epstein clarifies he is referring to the software of vision, not the hardware.
Re:
Epstein replies: 'Vision rules needed to craft coherent image . Edges? " Faggehtabowtit." Two edges crafted by software'
Re: an article you may both hate. or like.
Lengthy philosophical response regarding secular religions, the use of ridicule in debate, American exceptionalism, and the 'Davis' (Kim Davis) employment issue.
Re: [Subject Redacted]
Detailed discussion on dogma, secular religion, ridicule, and the 'Davis' case.
Re: an article you may both hate. or like.
Long discussion on dogma, secular religions, and ridicule.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity