| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994-01-01 | Court case | Thomas v. I.N.S., 35 F.3d 1332 (9th Cir. 1994), which enforced a cooperation agreement against th... | 9th Cir. | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Court case | Margalli-Olvera v. I.N.S., 43 F.3d 345, 353 (8th Cir. 1994) | 8th Circuit | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Court case | Thomas v. I.N.S., 35 F.3d 1332 (9th Cir. 1994) | 9th Circuit | View |
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated February 28, 2023, presents a series of case law citations to support the legal argument that a plea agreement made by an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) binds the entire United States government. The cited cases establish that the U.S. government is considered a single entity across all districts, and therefore, an agreement made by one of its attorneys in one location (e.g., West Virginia) is enforceable against federal prosecutors in another (e.g., South Dakota).
This document is page 'vi' (Page 7 of 113) of a legal filing dated February 28, 2023, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00021054. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents referenced in the main brief, including cases such as 'Hudson Valley Black Press v. I.R.S.' and 'Martin v. Hadix'. The document appears to be part of a larger Department of Justice filing, likely related to a FOIA case or appeal given the OGR marking.
This legal document, a page from a court filing, argues that a plea agreement made by a United States Attorney's Office (USAO) in one district is generally binding on other USAOs and the federal government as a whole. It cites several court cases, such as Gebbie and Van Thournout, to support this majority view, while also acknowledging contrary or more limited rulings from circuits like the Seventh and Sixth in a footnote.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity