plaza
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00019062.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, dated February 18, 2020. The sender informs a colleague that they and another redacted individual are traveling to Pensacola the following day to interview a person identified as Jeffrey Epstein's houseman from the 1990s through 2002.
EFTA00019046.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), dated October 8, 2021. It concerns the drafting and review of a 'Rule 404(b) letter' for the Ghislaine Maxwell case (inferred from attachment name 'Maxwell_Rule_404(b)'), which pertains to the admissibility of evidence regarding other crimes or acts. The emails discuss comments from colleagues, specifically mentioning 'Janis' (likely AUSA Janis Echenberg), and note a submission deadline of the following Monday.
EFTA00018228.pdf
An email dated September 17, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The subject 'To read on train 2' indicates the transfer of files for review, specifically five attachments containing FBI interview reports (FD-302s) and interview notes dated between September 2019 and April 2020. The names of the interview subjects are redacted.
EFTA00018032.pdf
An email dated August 2, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to attorneys with '@epllc.com' email addresses. The email notifies the recipients of a recent order by Judge Nathan regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, emphasizing that it applies to attorneys associated with the case, including attorneys for witnesses. The document likely pertains to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings.
EFTA00017811.pdf
A formal discovery request letter from Montell Figgins, attorney for Michael Thomas (one of the guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died), addressed to an Assistant US Attorney in the SDNY. The letter requests all materials (reports, photos, videos) created or possessed by the United States Inspector General regarding the incident. The letter cites Rule 16(a)(1)(C) and U.S. v. Bryan as legal basis for the request.
EFTA00016895.pdf
An email dated December 12, 2019, from the Co-Chief of the Narcotics Unit at the SDNY regarding an 'Epstein report'. The sender grants the recipient permission to take the document for review under strict conditions, including 'Attorney Eyes Only' status, a prohibition on reproduction, and a requirement to return it by 5 pm that same day.
EFTA00016484.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 24, 2021, related to the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It involves correspondence between the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan and legal counsel (including Brian Burns, Patrick Smith, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger) regarding the issuance of protective orders. An Assistant United States Attorney subsequently follows up with counsel to coordinate the transfer of materials via file sharing or thumb drive.
EFTA00016466.pdf
An email thread from November 24, 2021, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and likely defense counsel regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The discussion concerns the admissibility of mental health evidence, specifically referencing 'Sasso' and a motion to preclude 'Hall et al', and includes the exchange of a brief and an opinion by Judge Nathan. The sender notes they have litigated nine experts at that point.
EFTA00016343.pdf
This document contains an email chain between FBI personnel regarding an analysis of Ghislaine Maxwell's credit cards. A forensic accountant provided a draft analysis, and a subsequent email questions a discrepancy regarding an American Express card number starting with '34' instead of the standard '37', referencing a statement closing date of December 18, 2019.
EFTA00016323.pdf
An internal FBI email from a Forensic Accountant in the New York Field Office dated June 22, 2020. The email details findings from Ghislaine Maxwell's August 2019 Experian report, specifically regarding a CapitalOne/SAKS credit card which had a zero balance as of August 2019 with the last payment occurring in May 2019.
EFTA00016316.pdf
An email exchange between an FBI Forensic Accountant and a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated June 10, 2020. They discuss the management of a 'tracker of bank subpoenas' related to the Epstein case, specifically addressing the transfer of subpoena returns. The paralegal requests that files be uploaded to a system called 'USAfx' rather than sent on physical discs, citing 'the circumstances' (likely COVID-19 related given the date).
EFTA00016285.pdf
This document is an email dated August 28, 2020, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email transmits an attachment titled '2020.08.27_Letter.pdf', described as the plaintiff's opposition to a stay motion. The identities of the sender and recipients are redacted.
EFTA00015972.pdf
This document is an internal email chain among SDNY prosecutors dated December 21, 2020. It discusses a legal issue in the case *United States v. Rivera et al.*, where Judge Engelmayer expressed frustration that defendant Justin Rivera (at MCC) received significantly less access to discovery and legal counsel compared to Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC). The emails detail the stark difference in hours allowed (91 hours/week for Maxwell vs 21 hours/week for Rivera) and mention the seizure of 60 devices and an entire FBI file from a prior Florida investigation in the Maxwell case.
EFTA00015902.pdf
This document is an email chain between US Attorneys regarding a judicial inquiry into why Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC) received significantly better legal access than Justin Rivera (at MCC). Judge Engelmayer called the disparity 'terrible' optics. The BOP's explanation was that Maxwell's protective custody status (isolation) allowed her exclusive use of equipment, whereas Rivera was in the general population sharing limited resources with ~80 other inmates. The emails track the drafting of a declaration to explain this to the court by the December 31, 2020 deadline.
EFTA00015335.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding the opening of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial in November 2021. US Attorney Damian Williams sends encouragement to a redacted prosecutor who is set to deliver the opening statement. The thread includes a forwarded message that strongly contrasts SDNY's willingness to prosecute historical sex crimes with other jurisdictions (specifically mentioning Florida) and outlines the logistics for the trial's opening day.
EFTA00015030.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between an FBI Forensic Accountant and likely a prosecutor from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the compilation and review of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's financial accounts, specifically noting that Ghislaine Maxwell was a signer on these accounts. The requestor asks for subsequent account statements to analyze balances.
EFTA00014897.pdf
An internal email chain from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the commencement of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. An Assistant US Attorney writes a motivational message to colleagues, contrasting the SDNY's willingness to prosecute historical crimes with prosecutors in Florida, and asserts that Maxwell sexually exploited underage girls. The email provides logistical details for the trial opening at 40 Foley Square.
EFTA00014286.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 28, 2019, involving an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York and redacted colleagues. The discussion concerns scheduling a meeting to address a 'forfeiture question relating to a property' in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The participants coordinate a time around 3:30 PM, noting a conflict with a 4:00 PM engagement with Judge Sullivan.
EFTA00013337.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) from December 2020. It discusses a legal issue raised by Judge Engelmayer in the case of *United States v. Rivera*, where the judge criticized the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) for providing significantly better access to counsel and electronic discovery to Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC) compared to Justin Rivera (at MCC). The emails detail the drafting of a declaration to explain that Maxwell's privileges (such as 13 hours/day of laptop access) are due to her unique protective custody status and the massive volume of discovery in her case, whereas Rivera is in the general population with shared resources.
EFTA00013329.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding a legal issue raised by Judge Engelmayer in the case *United States v. Rivera*. The Judge criticized the disparity between the extensive discovery and counsel access provided to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn (91 hours/week laptop access) versus the limited access provided to Justin Rivera at MCC New York (21 hours/week). The emails discuss drafting a declaration to explain that these differences are due to Maxwell's unique protective custody status and facility capabilities, rather than preferential treatment based on class or race.
EFTA00013301.pdf
This document is an email dated April 29, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case US v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). The email transmits a letter from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) legal counsel in response to a court order from earlier that day, noting that the letter was not filed electronically because the MDC is not a formal party to the case.
EFTA00011133.pdf
This document is a letter dated October 13, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The Government asserts that Maxwell has waived her right to use an insanity or mental condition defense (Rule 12.2) because she failed to provide notice by the pretrial motion deadlines in early 2021. The letter demands that if the defense intends to use such evidence despite the waiver, they must provide notice by October 20, 2021.
EFTA00010945.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2021 among staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding the opening of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The emails discuss logistical details such as courtroom locations and timing, confirm the selection of the jury, and include a motivational message contrasting the SDNY's willingness to prosecute with Florida prosecutors' previous handling of related cases. The text emphasizes the goal of holding Maxwell accountable for sexually exploiting underage girls.
EFTA00010160.pdf
This document is a letter dated November 16, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves as a cover letter for the production of discovery materials, specifically AT&T records, phone records, and photographs, noting that these materials are subject to a protective order.
EFTA00010154.pdf
This document is an email dated November 15, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The email subject concerns 'co-conspirator statements/ GX 52' and includes attachments referencing Rule 801(d)(2)(e) and Exhibit 52. The body of the email indicates that the sender is transmitting the defense's letter oppositions regarding these topics.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity