An email thread from November 24, 2021, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and likely defense counsel regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The discussion concerns the admissibility of mental health evidence, specifically referencing 'Sasso' and a motion to preclude 'Hall et al', and includes the exchange of a brief and an opinion by Judge Nathan. The sender notes they have litigated nine experts at that point.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Opinion attached to the email; Presiding Judge over the Maxwell trial.
|
| Sasso | Subject of Legal Briefing |
Referenced in subject line 'Maxwell Briefing re Sasso' and body regarding 'admissibility of mental health evidence / ...
|
| Hall | Subject of Motion |
Mentioned in attachment filename 'Motion_to_preclude_Hall_et_al'.
|
| Redacted Sender (Top Email) | Legal Counsel (Likely Defense) |
Providing motions and opinions to USANYS; mentions litigating experts.
|
| Redacted Sender (Bottom Email) | Assistant United States Attorney |
Requesting brief regarding mental health evidence/Sasso.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Recipient/Sender)
|
|
| United States Attorney's Office |
Sender's organization
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Jurisdiction
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of US Attorney's Office
|
"We've litigated I think nine experts at this point."Source
"The process of redacting/sealing this stuff has been overcomplicated"Source
"Can you please send us the brief you filed regarding admissibility of mental health evidence / Sasso"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,277 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document