EFTA00016466.pdf

42.9 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size: 42.9 KB
Summary

An email thread from November 24, 2021, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and likely defense counsel regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The discussion concerns the admissibility of mental health evidence, specifically referencing 'Sasso' and a motion to preclude 'Hall et al', and includes the exchange of a brief and an opinion by Judge Nathan. The sender notes they have litigated nine experts at that point.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Judge Nathan Judge
Opinion attached to the email; Presiding Judge over the Maxwell trial.
Sasso Subject of Legal Briefing
Referenced in subject line 'Maxwell Briefing re Sasso' and body regarding 'admissibility of mental health evidence / ...
Hall Subject of Motion
Mentioned in attachment filename 'Motion_to_preclude_Hall_et_al'.
Redacted Sender (Top Email) Legal Counsel (Likely Defense)
Providing motions and opinions to USANYS; mentions litigating experts.
Redacted Sender (Bottom Email) Assistant United States Attorney
Requesting brief regarding mental health evidence/Sasso.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USANYS
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Recipient/Sender)
United States Attorney's Office
Sender's organization
Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction

Timeline (1 events)

2021-11-24
Exchange of legal documents regarding mental health evidence and expert witnesses in the Maxwell trial.
New York (SDNY)
US Attorney's Office Defense Counsel

Locations (1)

Location Context
Address of US Attorney's Office

Relationships (1)

USANYS Opposing Counsel Defense Counsel
Email exchange regarding discovery/briefs in Maxwell case.

Key Quotes (3)

"We've litigated I think nine experts at this point."
Source
EFTA00016466.pdf
Quote #1
"The process of redacting/sealing this stuff has been overcomplicated"
Source
EFTA00016466.pdf
Quote #2
"Can you please send us the brief you filed regarding admissibility of mental health evidence / Sasso"
Source
EFTA00016466.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,277 characters)

From: [Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted]
[Redacted])" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Maxwell Briefing re Sasso
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:28:29 +0000
Attachments: Motion_to_preclude_Hall_et_al_[unredacted].pdf;
2021.11.22_20cr330_Hall_Temp._Seal._Mem._Op._&_Order_11.22.21.pdf
Here you go. Also attaching Judge Nathan’s opinion. [Redacted] did a really nice job with this, we’re so thankful he pitched in.
We’ve litigated I think nine experts at this point.
The process of redacting/sealing this stuff has been overcomplicated, so if you’d like to cite to any of this please check
with [Redacted] copied here, who can help sort that out.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 9:08 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Maxwell Briefing re Sasso
Can you please send us the brief you filed regarding admissibility of mental health evidence / Sasso — [Redacted] says your team
filed something about this (and maybe [Redacted] worked on it)?
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
Tel: [Redacted]
EFTA00016466

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document