| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Council on Foreign Relations
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employer driver |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Hugh Hurwitz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jared Eannucci
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SDNY Assistant US Attorney
|
Professional law enforcement |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Flight | A witness, Kate, is questioned about running into an acquaintance named Ray on a flight. She conf... | On a plane | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Hurricane Katrina impact and subsequent comments by Mayor Nagin. | New Orleans | View |
This document is an email chain from July 2021 between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a CBP Task Force Officer regarding travel records for Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The CBP officer clarifies that outbound travel records between 1990 and 2000 were not recorded in the CBP database at that time, limiting the historical data available. The correspondence also notes that Maxwell has records under two name variations (with and without a space in her surname) and discusses cross-referencing these with an attached spreadsheet.
This document is an email chain from July and August 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). An Assistant United States Attorney reached out to a contact named Ray (referred by Jared Eannucci) to obtain records for a case. The final email in the chain confirms the transmission of several pdf attachments containing travel records, specifically named 'JE_Travel.pdf' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) and 'Maxwell_travel...pdf' (Ghislaine Maxwell).
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated February 10, 2020. An employee asks colleagues for guidance on how to respond to an 'Epstein statement.' The email chain includes a forwarded message containing an attachment titled 'Ray Statement.ebd.docx'.
This legal document is a page from a court filing, specifically page 5 of 6 from Document 548 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 15, 2021. The Court denies the Defense's request for a witness to testify under a pseudonym, arguing that the witness does not qualify as a victim under the Crime Victims' Rights Act because her anticipated testimony is that she was not a target of sexual misconduct by Epstein or Ms. Maxwell. The Court distinguishes this situation from a prior ruling where pseudonyms were allowed to protect the identities of other, actual victims.
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated March 24, 2021. It details a procedural order (Entry 172) regarding Maxwell's attempt to subpoena a law firm representing her alleged victims for confidential information, setting a schedule for objections and redactions. Additionally, it records Maxwell's filing of a Notice of Appeal (Entry 173) regarding a separate order, along with the associated fee and transmission of records to the US Court of Appeals.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on her relationship with an acquaintance named Ray, a potential encounter on a plane, and alleged conversations about the "Epstein matter." Kate denies telling Ray about the case, or having plans to write a book, make a movie, or move to Italy with money from the case.
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a cross-examination of a person named Kate. The questioning covers a $1,200 payment for therapy and Kate's familiarity with a man named Ray Hamilton, whom she describes as an acquaintance and a friend of a friend, known both in 'the states' and London.
This document is an email exchange from August 11, 2019, in which an official from the OAG (Office of the Attorney General) sends a detailed timeline of Jeffrey Epstein's final days to Hugh Hurwitz of the Bureau of Prisons for verification. The sender asks if the timeline is accurate and if there is any reason it should not be released to the public. The timeline covers events from Epstein being placed on suicide watch on July 23rd to his death on August 10th, highlighting critical details such as the removal of his cellmate and the failure of staff to perform all required checks on the night he died.
This legal document, page 7 of a court filing from April 5, 2021, analyzes Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c) concerning ex parte applications for pretrial subpoenas. It contrasts the majority view, which generally disfavors such applications unless for trial use, with specific court precedents that permit them to protect sensitive information like trial strategy. The text cites several cases, including Weisman, Fox, and Reyes, to illustrate the legal arguments and differing practices among court districts.
This legal document, page 5 of a filing from April 5, 2021, presents the U.S. Government's argument for having legal standing to challenge subpoenas issued to third parties. Citing multiple court precedents (including Nachamie, Cole, and Carton), the Government asserts its legitimate interest in preventing witness harassment, controlling the timing of disclosures (such as Giglio material), and protecting its own communications. The document argues that allowing the Government to intervene is the only way to protect these interests, especially when a subpoena recipient may not be fully aware of the case's context.
This legal document, filed on March 24, 2021, is a court order outlining the procedure for a law firm representing alleged victims to object to a proposed subpoena. The Court acknowledges receipt of a letter from the firm on March 19, 2021, and sets a deadline of March 26, 2021, for the firm to formally file its objections. The order mandates that the law firm must first confer with defense counsel to potentially narrow the issues and discuss redactions, citing legal precedents for these procedures.
This document is a comprehensive professional biography of Quincy Jones, detailing his career in music, film, and television production up to approximately 2001. It outlines his business ventures, including the formation of Quincy Jones Entertainment and Qwest Broadcasting, highlighting a significant financial transaction where Qwest Broadcasting was sold for $270 million in 1999. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein case, though Epstein himself is not mentioned in the text.
This document appears to be a page (327) from a manuscript or book draft, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. The text details the author's 1985 criticism of the United Nations' 'blacklist' of entertainers who performed in South Africa during apartheid, labeling it 'reverse McCarthyism.' It references specific celebrities included on the list (such as Frank Sinatra and Queen) and concludes with an anecdote about corresponding with filmmaker Woody Allen regarding the issue.
This document appears to be a page from a political article or briefing paper analyzing U.S.-Iran relations, specifically focusing on nuclear negotiations, sanctions, and the political stalemate between the Obama administration and Congress (circa 2013). It references the Council on Foreign Relations and Chuck Hagel's confirmation hearings. While stamped with a House Oversight mark typical of the Epstein document dumps, the specific text on this page concerns geopolitical strategy and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document page appears to be part of a media briefing or news digest (marked with a House Oversight Bates number). It contains the conclusion of an opinion piece by Ray Takeyh (CFR) arguing for patience in US dealings with Iran, followed by the header and lead for a Guardian article by Simon Jenkins dated February 13, 2013, criticizing the effectiveness of sanctions against Iran and North Korea.
This document is an email sent by Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Summers on February 15, 2013. The content of the email is the full text of an article or op-ed by Ray Takeyh titled 'take-it-or-leave-it deal by the U.S. on the nuclear issue is the wrong strategy,' which analyzes US-Iran diplomatic relations and nuclear negotiations. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a transcript or narrative description of a comedy roast honoring a man named 'Harlan'. It features dialogue between a critic named Diehl and the comedian Robin Williams. Williams makes jokes about the critic, the legal profession, and Harlan's eccentric home architecture. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it is part of a larger government document production, though the specific page content relates to entertainment and comedy rather than explicit illicit activity.
This document is Page 93 of a text titled 'Chapter 10: Seeing Invisible Minds,' authored by Nicholas Epley, Ph.D. It appears to be an academic or non-fiction book page discussing the psychological concept of 'Theory of Mind' and how humans perceive the intentions of others (and God). It uses the 'Miracle on the Hudson' (US Airways Flight 1549) and Mayor Ray Nagin's comments on Hurricane Katrina as illustrative examples. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021339', suggesting it was included in a document production for a Congressional investigation, potentially related to a larger cache of documents involving Epstein or financial oversight, though the specific content of this page is academic in nature.
This document is a page from an address book, likely Jeffrey Epstein's 'Black Book', containing contact information for various individuals, medical professionals, and staff. It lists Epstein's own contact details including multiple phone lines, vehicles (Armored Merc S600), and email. Notably, two entries—Christophe Gale and Francis Peadon (Cleaners)—are circled and handwritten with the word 'Witness', suggesting use in a legal or investigative context.
Introduction referencing Jared Eannucci and request to connect by phone regarding a case question.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity