HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027107.jpg
2.73 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Article / news analysis / policy briefing (fragment)
File Size:
2.73 MB
Summary
This document appears to be a page from a political article or briefing paper analyzing U.S.-Iran relations, specifically focusing on nuclear negotiations, sanctions, and the political stalemate between the Obama administration and Congress (circa 2013). It references the Council on Foreign Relations and Chuck Hagel's confirmation hearings. While stamped with a House Oversight mark typical of the Epstein document dumps, the specific text on this page concerns geopolitical strategy and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ray Takeyh | Iran expert |
Quoted regarding Iranian politics and the Council on Foreign Relations
|
| Ali Khamenei | Supreme Leader of Iran |
Referred to as 'Khamenei' and 'the ayatollah'; noted for difficult political position regarding compromise
|
| Chuck Hagel | Secretary of Defense Nominee |
Mentioned in the context of his confirmation hearing and views on Iran sanctions
|
| Barack Obama | U.S. President |
Referred to as 'Obama' and 'the president'; discussed regarding his stance on containment, sanctions waivers, and pot...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Council on Foreign Relations |
Organization where Ray Takeyh is an expert
|
|
| U.S. Congress |
Described as holding 'high cards' regarding sanctions legislation
|
|
| The White House |
Discussed as being stuck between Tehran and Capitol Hill
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Source of the document stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027107)
|
Timeline (2 events)
2009
Failed deal between U.S. and Iranian negotiators to send uranium stockpile out of Iran
Unknown
U.S. officials
Iranian negotiators
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Subject of the geopolitical analysis
|
|
|
Used metonymically for the Iranian government
|
|
|
Subject of the geopolitical analysis
|
|
|
Used metonymically for the U.S. Congress
|
Relationships (1)
Described as 'an Iran expert with the Council on Foreign Relations'
Key Quotes (3)
"Khamenei has created a politics where it's hard for him to compromise."Source
— Ray Takeyh
(Describing the internal political pressure on the Iranian leader)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027107.jpg
Quote #1
""containment" is not an option."Source
— Barack Obama
(The President's stance on a nuclear-armed Iran)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027107.jpg
Quote #2
"Iran left us no choice, he might say, as the bombers fly."Source
— Author (Hypothetical)
(Speculating on the justification for a potential future military strike)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027107.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,298 characters)
peace deal are clear enough, too. But in both cases, neither side trusts the other, and each demands that the other go first. Instead, nobody goes anywhere.
U.S. officials have very good reason to be wary of Iran's bona fides. In 2009, they reached a deal with Iranian negotiators to send the stockpile of highly enriched uranium out of the country -- only to see the ayatollah repudiate it. As Ray Takeyh, an Iran expert with the Council on Foreign Relations puts it, "Khamenei has created a politics where it's hard for him to compromise." But so has the United States. Anyone who watched Chuck Hagel's confirmation hearing knows that it is an article of faith in Congress -- and pretty much a bipartisan one -- that Iran is a faithless, illegitimate terrorist state that will be deterred from building a bomb only by the threat of massive attack. Had Hagel been foolish enough to suggest that the United States offer to reduce sanctions in exchange for Iranian concessions, the White House would have had to find a new candidate for defense secretary.
It's the U.S. Congress that arguably holds the high cards, though the White House put them in its hands. The most potent sanctions are legislated, and have been written in such a way that they will be very hard to unwind. Obama can waive them for up to six months. But the ayatollah is not about to make irreversible decisions in exchange for six months of relief.
The White House is thus stuck between Tehran and Capitol Hill. And it can't live long with the current stalemate. After all, Obama has said that "containment" is not an option. He is hoping that the combination of economic pain and fear of military action will bring Tehran to its senses. If it doesn't, the president has said that he is prepared to use force. Perhaps he feels that just as spurned engagement served as the predicate for tough sanctions, so would failed negotiations lay the predicate for a broadly supported strike against Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran left us no choice, he might say, as the bombers fly.
That would constitute a diplomatic triumph ... if a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities is a good idea. If in fact it's a dreadful prospect -- worse, perhaps, even than containment -- then it would constitute a failure that
U.S. officials have very good reason to be wary of Iran's bona fides. In 2009, they reached a deal with Iranian negotiators to send the stockpile of highly enriched uranium out of the country -- only to see the ayatollah repudiate it. As Ray Takeyh, an Iran expert with the Council on Foreign Relations puts it, "Khamenei has created a politics where it's hard for him to compromise." But so has the United States. Anyone who watched Chuck Hagel's confirmation hearing knows that it is an article of faith in Congress -- and pretty much a bipartisan one -- that Iran is a faithless, illegitimate terrorist state that will be deterred from building a bomb only by the threat of massive attack. Had Hagel been foolish enough to suggest that the United States offer to reduce sanctions in exchange for Iranian concessions, the White House would have had to find a new candidate for defense secretary.
It's the U.S. Congress that arguably holds the high cards, though the White House put them in its hands. The most potent sanctions are legislated, and have been written in such a way that they will be very hard to unwind. Obama can waive them for up to six months. But the ayatollah is not about to make irreversible decisions in exchange for six months of relief.
The White House is thus stuck between Tehran and Capitol Hill. And it can't live long with the current stalemate. After all, Obama has said that "containment" is not an option. He is hoping that the combination of economic pain and fear of military action will bring Tehran to its senses. If it doesn't, the president has said that he is prepared to use force. Perhaps he feels that just as spurned engagement served as the predicate for tough sanctions, so would failed negotiations lay the predicate for a broadly supported strike against Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran left us no choice, he might say, as the bombers fly.
That would constitute a diplomatic triumph ... if a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities is a good idea. If in fact it's a dreadful prospect -- worse, perhaps, even than containment -- then it would constitute a failure that
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027107
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document