Potential Government Witnesses
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
defendant's lawyers
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Identification bonding |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The trial of this criminal action, for which Discovery materials are to be used for preparation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The trial of this criminal action. | N/A | View |
EFTA00014896.pdf
This document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330), dated November 28, 2021. The order grants the Government's request to file a letter motion under seal to protect the privacy of anticipated witnesses regarding cross-examination limitations. It also orders the Defendant to respond to the motion by 2:00 p.m. on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00008399.jpg
This document is page 5 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 17, 2021. The Judge is issuing a ruling regarding the Sixth Amendment confrontation clause and the admissibility of evidence concerning the thoroughness of the government's investigation. The Court rules to preclude the defense from introducing affirmative evidence attacking the investigation's thoroughness unless it is probative of the defendant's guilt, citing cases such as United States v. Figueroa and Kyles v. Whitley.
DOJ-OGR-00001651.jpg
This document is a page from a Protective Order in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 27, 2020. It establishes strict rules for handling 'Discovery' materials, limiting their use by both government and defense witnesses and counsel solely for preparation for the criminal trial. The order explicitly prohibits using the information for civil proceedings and forbids any party, including the Defendant and defense team, from posting the Discovery or its contents on the Internet.
DOJ-OGR-00021770.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal appellate brief (Case 22-1426) filed on July 27, 2023, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction should be overturned due to 'Juror 50's' bias. The text contends that Juror 50 failed to disclose his own history of sexual abuse during voir dire, which later caused him to improperly identify with prosecution witnesses and influence other jurors based on his personal trauma rather than the evidence alone.
DOJ-OGR-00019506.jpg
This document is a page from a Protective Order in a criminal case (Case 20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on July 27, 2020. It outlines strict rules for handling discovery materials, specifying that they can only be used by authorized individuals (such as the defense team and potential witnesses) for the sole purpose of preparing for the trial. The order explicitly prohibits all parties from posting any discovery information on the Internet and requires encryption for materials shared via non-electronic mail methods.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Bankrupt Corporat... | Potential Governm... | $0.00 | Bribe paid to a witness using secreted bankrupt... | View |
Discovery materials for trial preparation
The Government disseminates Discovery to its potential witnesses and their counsel for the sole purpose of preparing for the criminal trial.
Discovery materials for trial preparation
The Government disseminates Discovery to its potential witnesses and their counsel for the sole purpose of preparing for the criminal trial.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity