Mr. Thomas
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Noel
|
Professional co conspirators |
6
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
presiding judge
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Noel
|
Co defendants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. FIGGINS
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court proceeding | A judge sets the pretrial release conditions for Mr. Thomas and Ms. Noel, including travel restri... | Court | View |
| 2020-03-14 | Legal proceeding | The government responded to defendant Thomas's requests with a one-sentence denial. | N/A | View |
| 2020-01-29 | Legal proceeding | Defendant Thomas made certain requests to the government for production of documents under Rule 1... | N/A | View |
| 2019-12-16 | Legal proceeding | The parties in the case agreed to a protective order regarding discovery, which was entered by th... | Court | View |
| 2019-11-25 | Legal proceeding | A pretrial conference was held where the government made responses that were later referenced in ... | Court | View |
| 2019-08-10 | Crime | Defendants Thomas and Noel allegedly failed to conduct prisoner counts and then conspired to conc... | Special Housing Unit, Metro... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00022041.jpg
This legal document, a court filing from April 9, 2020, argues that the government must produce all relevant and exculpatory evidence to the defendant, Mr. Thomas, for trial preparation. Citing the Brady doctrine and cases like United States v. Bagley, it asserts that the government has an affirmative duty to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant, including information that can impeach prosecution witnesses, and that the court should compel this discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00022036.jpg
This document is a legal filing on behalf of a defendant, Mr. Thomas, arguing for the disclosure of evidence related to his criminal charges. The defense contends that rampant staffing shortages and mismanagement by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) forced the defendant to engage in the alleged conduct. To support this claim, the filing references an attached memorandum from a union meeting that occurred just three days before Jeffrey Epstein's death at the same facility in August 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00022029.jpg
This legal document provides background on the criminal case against correctional officers Mr. Thomas and Noel, who are charged with conspiracy and creating false records. The charges stem from an investigation that began after the alleged suicide of Jeffrey Epstein on August 10, 2019, at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, where the defendants allegedly failed to conduct required prisoner counts and falsified logs to cover it up. The document also outlines the procedural history of discovery requests made by defendant Thomas, which were denied by the government.
DOJ-OGR-00021990.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 19, 2019. An attorney, Mr. Figgins, successfully requests a one-week extension to secure cosigners for his client, Mr. Thomas, a process which requires an interview by the U.S. Attorney's Office. Subsequently, another attorney, Ms. Donaleski, requests that time be excluded from trial calculations, which the court grants under the Speedy Trial Act.
DOJ-OGR-00021969.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a judge is outlining the pretrial release conditions for two individuals, Mr. Thomas and Ms. Noel. The conditions include specific travel restrictions, a requirement for Mr. Thomas to refrain from excessive alcohol use, and a potential mental health evaluation for Ms. Noel. The judge warns them that violating these conditions will result in an arrest warrant, forfeiture of a $100,000 bond, and a separate charge of bail-jumping.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity