| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MS. DONALESKI
|
Professional adversarial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. DONALESKI
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. FOY
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. LONERGAN
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Thomas
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendants
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Client]
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Court hearing | A hearing was held where the court granted a motion to exclude time from the date of the hearing ... | Southern District Court (in... | View |
| 2020-06-22 | N/A | Court ordered start date for proceedings. | Courtroom | View |
| 2020-06-01 | N/A | Mr. Figgins' scheduled cruise/vacation. | Italy | View |
| 2020-03-20 | N/A | New deadline for defense motion | Court | View |
| 2020-02-10 | N/A | Court Hearing/Status Conference | Courtroom (likely SDNY) | View |
| 2019-12-19 | N/A | Court hearing/status conference (Document Filed Date) | Court | View |
| 2019-12-19 | Court hearing | A hearing where Mr. Figgins requested a seven-day extension to secure cosigners for Mr. Thomas, a... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-12-19 | Court hearing | A discussion during a court proceeding regarding the defense's request for a timeline on an inspe... | Court | View |
| 2019-12-19 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2019-12-16 | Court proceeding | A court hearing to discuss the pretrial release conditions for Defendant Thomas and Defendant Noe... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-08-19 | N/A | Issuance/Service of Grand Jury Subpoena | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 0023-02-01 | N/A | Personal visit for Mr. Figgins' relative | N/A | View |
An email dated August 19, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a Mr. Figgins. The email serves as a cover letter for an attached grand jury subpoena directed at Mr. Figgins' client, whose name is redacted.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on February 10, 2020. The dialogue focuses on scheduling a trial or hearing date, with attorneys Mr. Foy and Mr. Figgins discussing conflicts regarding personal family travel and vacations in June. The Court ultimately overrides Mr. Foy's objection regarding family travel arrangements, setting a start date of June 22nd and citing the attorney's obligation to represent their client.
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing filed on February 10, 2020. Attorney Mr. Figgins requests permission to file a formal motion regarding the 'Investigator General's report' and asks for a schedule extension due to an elderly relative visiting. The Court grants the extension, setting a motion deadline for March 20, with the prosecution (Ms. Lonergan) to oppose by April 10.
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 19, 2019. An attorney, Mr. Figgins, successfully requests a one-week extension to secure cosigners for his client, Mr. Thomas, a process which requires an interview by the U.S. Attorney's Office. Subsequently, another attorney, Ms. Donaleski, requests that time be excluded from trial calculations, which the court grants under the Speedy Trial Act.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on December 19, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Figgins argues to the judge that an ongoing Inspector General's report investigating the Bureau of Prisons' supervision and policies is crucial for the defense. Figgins requests clarity on the status and release date of this report, citing media reports about testimony from the head of the BOP and statements by the U.S. Attorney.
This is a transcript of a court proceeding from December 19, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. Defense counsel, Mr. Figgins, requests that the court obtain a timeline from the government for an inspector general's report, which he believes is vital for his case. The government's counsel, Ms. Donaleski, responds that she does not have a timeline for the report but assures the court that all relevant discovery materials will be provided to the defense.
This document is page 4 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (United States v. Tartaglione), filed on December 19, 2019. The discussion involves scheduling, specifically regarding a 'DOJ inspector general report' (likely related to the Jeffrey Epstein jail suicide investigation, as Tartaglione was Epstein's cellmate) which the defense is interested in, while the prosecution (Ms. Donaleski) argues it should not delay the case. The Court sets a control date for January 30 and a trial date for April 20.
This document is a court transcript from case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on December 16, 2019. In the transcript, the presiding judge grants a motion to exclude time until November 25th to allow the government to produce discovery, which the defense counsel agrees to. The judge also advises counsel to contact Judge Torres' deputy to resolve a separate scheduling issue.
This document is a court transcript from December 16, 2019, detailing a hearing about the pretrial release conditions for defendants Thomas and Noel. The conditions discussed include restrictions on alcohol use and mandatory mental health evaluation, as directed by pretrial services. An attorney, Mr. Foy, objects to one of the conditions, stating it was not part of a prior agreement on the terms of release.
Discussion regarding the filing of a motion concerning the IG report and rescheduling deadlines due to personal reasons.
Mr. Figgins asks the Court to obtain a time frame from the government for the release of an inspector general's report, stating it contains relevant facts needed for the defense.
Mr. Figgins asks the Court to obtain a time frame from the government for the release of an inspector general's report, stating it contains relevant facts needed for the defense.
Mr. Figgins argues that the Inspector General's report on Bureau of Prisons policies is critical for the defense and requests information on its status and completion date.
Attached please find the grand jury subpoena directed to your client, [Redacted].
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity