| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Parfit
|
Intellectual academic |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780-01-01 | N/A | Kant's question 'What is Enlightenment?' | Europe | View |
This document is page 36 of a text authored by Peter Singer, identifiable by the bio at the bottom. It is a philosophical essay or review discussing Derek Parfit's book 'On What Matters,' analyzing moral theories including Kantianism, social-contract theory, and utilitarianism. The text concludes with a bio of Peter Singer and bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031911', indicating it is part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
This document is page 35 of a larger text, marked with a House Oversight stamp. The content is a philosophical essay or review discussing Derek Parfit's book 'On What Matters.' It analyzes Parfit's arguments regarding objectivism in ethics, rationality, and the disagreements between historical philosophers like Kant and Bentham.
This document appears to be a page (p. 45) from an essay or book, likely authored by philosopher Daniel Dennett (identified via Footnote 10), included as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation. The text discusses the limitations and philosophical implications of Artificial Intelligence, critiquing Joseph Weizenbaum's views on 'Strong AI' and referencing IBM's Watson and George Church. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016848', suggesting it was gathered as evidence, likely related to inquiries into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research or the Edge Foundation.
This document is a corrected proof page dated October 9, 2014, for a book titled 'The Crooked Course: Step by Step on the Path to Peace.' It contains the Introduction to the work, which details the Arab-Israeli conflict, the structure of the book (divided into five parts), and specific mentions of the Sykes-Picot Agreement and the disengagement from Gaza. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp (023161), indicating it was part of the Congressional investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, potentially found among his personal papers or related to a project he funded.
This document appears to be a page (page 297) from an academic text or book titled 'Morality Games,' stamped with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015509,' indicating it is part of an investigative evidence file. The text discusses psychological and philosophical concepts of altruism, the 'Envelope Game,' strategic vs. principled behavior, and Kantian ethics, utilizing examples ranging from religious figures to modern politicians like John Kerry. While it does not contain direct communications or flight logs, its inclusion in the Oversight files suggests it may have been part of the materials (likely scientific literature) exchanged within the Epstein network, known for its interest in evolutionary psychology and game theory.
This document is page 295 of an academic text titled 'Morality Games,' bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015507. The text discusses game theory concepts such as 'uncorrelated asymmetries,' the 'Hawk-Dove' model, and the 'Envelope Game,' citing researchers including Martin Nowak, a Harvard professor known to have received funding from Jeffrey Epstein. The content explores the intersection of game theory, law, and ethics, referencing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Immanuel Kant.
This document is a bibliography page (numbered 347) containing academic citations related to artificial intelligence, robotics, cognitive science, and philosophy. It specifically references works by notable figures such as Ray Kurzweil, Yann LeCun, Bill Joy, and Shane Legg, covering topics like the 'Singularity', 'Friendly AI', and neural networks. The document bears a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013263', indicating it is part of a collection of records reviewed by the House Oversight Committee, possibly related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's connections with the scientific community.
This document appears to be page 157 of a philosophical or scientific manuscript. The text discusses psychoanalysis, political polarity (referencing the Bush/Ashcroft administration), and the philosophy of mathematics (contrasting Platonic views with biological/psychological origins). It explores the nature of reality versus abstract concepts like the Pythagorean theorem. While part of the House Oversight Epstein production, the specific page contains no direct references to Epstein or his associates, though the subject matter aligns with Epstein's known interest in theoretical science and mathematics.
A philosophical text, likely a speech draft or essay, found within House Oversight documents (Bates stamped 029672). The unnamed author—who identifies as seeing the world through 'politics, political economy and internationalism'—discusses the tension and necessary unity between scientific logic/reason and artistic intuition/passion. The text draws heavily on Immanuel Kant's philosophy and musical analogies (Mahler, Hoffman) to argue that solving complex problems requires blending 'policy ambition' with 'imagination'.
This document is a printout of an article from The Australian featuring an interview with Paul Keating. The text focuses on Keating's geopolitical views, specifically criticizing the structure of the Eurozone, the expansion of NATO under Bill Clinton, and Alan Greenspan's role in the 2008 financial crisis, while praising Obama's internationalism. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a US Congressional investigation.
This document is an email thread from October 31, 2011. Katherine Keating sent a mass email to friends (including Jeffrey Epstein) sharing an article from 'The Australian' regarding her father, Paul Keating, and his new book 'After Words', which had launched in Sydney. Jeffrey Epstein replied to Katherine directly with the brief inquiry, 'where are you?'.
This document is a printout of a news article from 'The Australian' featuring an interview with Paul Keating. Keating criticizes the structure of the Eurozone, blames Bill Clinton for NATO expansion (which he claims created Putin), and holds Alan Greenspan responsible for the 2008 financial crisis. He also discusses his philosophy on leadership, citing Kant and the importance of music. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation production.
This document is page 39 of a larger file labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021285', containing a list of academic endnotes (numbered 14-29). The citations reference works in sociobiology, evolutionary psychology, theology, and philosophy, including prominent authors such as E.O. Wilson, Richard Dawkins, John Cacioppo, Thomas Aquinas, Aristotle, and Kant. While no direct narrative text links to Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page, the content reflects the high-level academic and scientific interests often associated with Epstein's funding activities (particularly evolutionary biology).
This document appears to be a page (204) from a philosophical or academic manuscript discussing the evolution of political systems, the impact of technology (specifically AI and machine learning), and the concept of 'enmeshment.' It references historical figures and events to contextualize modern challenges regarding citizenship, voting, and power distribution in a networked world. The text speculates on a future where AI influences elections and questions whether current democratic structures can survive modern technological pressures.
This document appears to be page 152 of a historical book or manuscript discussing the history of colonialism, the opium wars in China, and the rise of industrial warfare (specifically the Maxim and Gatling guns). It references historical figures like Lin Zexu, Queen Victoria, Lincoln, and Bismarck. While the text itself is historical non-fiction, the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018384' indicates it was included in a document production for the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of a larger investigation file (possibly related to Jeffrey Epstein's financial records or associates, where such a book or manuscript might have been found in evidence).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity