Carton
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-19 | Court ruling | A ruling was issued in United States v. Carton, which involved quashing a subpoena for government... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2018-10-19 | Court ruling | A ruling was made in the case of United States v. Carton. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00005580.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated October 29, 2021, argues that the jury should not consider the adequacy or methods of the government's investigation when determining a defendant's guilt. Citing multiple legal precedents, the author contends that details about investigations, including the one involving Jeffrey Epstein, are irrelevant to the case at hand. The document refutes the defense's position that they should be allowed to challenge the thoroughness of the government's investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00002894.jpg
This legal document, page 5 of a filing from April 5, 2021, presents the U.S. Government's argument for having legal standing to challenge subpoenas issued to third parties. Citing multiple court precedents (including Nachamie, Cole, and Carton), the Government asserts its legitimate interest in preventing witness harassment, controlling the timing of disclosures (such as Giglio material), and protecting its own communications. The document argues that allowing the Government to intervene is the only way to protect these interests, especially when a subpoena recipient may not be fully aware of the case's context.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity