Cosby
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
D.A. Castor
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Constand
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Bruce Castor
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Constad
|
Friend |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Cosby's attorneys
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
D.A. Castor
|
Prosecutor defendant initial decision |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
D.A. Castor's successors
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
D.A. Castor
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Constand
|
Accuser defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
D.A. Castor
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Cosby's assistants
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bruce Castor
|
Prosecutor subject |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Constand
|
Defendant victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Constad
|
Financial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
John Schmitt
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bruce L. Castor, Jr.
|
Prosecutor defendant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Constand
|
Sexual contact disputed nature |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
one's attorneys
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney Schmitt
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Castor
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Constand
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Constand
|
Victim defendant cited case |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Constand
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nineteen Women
|
Alleged victims witnesses |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Constand
|
Accused accuser |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Trial court denied motion regarding non-prosecution agreement. | Pennsylvania Trial Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Two criminal trials and conviction | Criminal Court | View |
| N/A | Legal event (depositions) | Cosby testified in four depositions in Constand’s civil case without ever invoking his Fifth Amen... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged assaults involving prior bad acts witnesses (in Cosby case) | Pennsylvania (implied) | View |
| N/A | Incident | Cosby provided pills to Constad and refused to identify them. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil case participation | N/A | View |
| N/A | Civil action | A civil action where Cosby was forced to testify under penalty of perjury, without Fifth Amendmen... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Criminal trial | Cosby's criminal trial where D.A. Castor's successors used Cosby's prior sworn inculpatory testim... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Communication/meeting attempt | Constad telephoned Cosby and secretly recorded the conversation, during which Cosby offered assis... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal action | Constad filed a police report accusing Cosby of sexual assault. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Sexual assault | Incident involving Cosby and Constad, which occurred in Cosby's home. | Cosby's home | View |
| N/A | Legal decision | D.A. Castor's decision not to prosecute Cosby. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Cosby sat for four depositions and incriminated himself, in reliance upon D.A. Castor's decision. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Investigation of Cosby and subsequent agreement not to prosecute to facilitate civil deposition. | Pennsylvania (implied by 'C... | View |
| N/A | Legal decision | D.A. Castor made an unconditional decision not to prosecute Cosby. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Deposition | Cosby sat for depositions in a civil action and was forced to testify. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal settlement | A civil action against Cosby was settled for a significant amount of money. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Prosecutorial decision | D.A. Castor announced his declination decision not to prosecute Cosby on behalf of the Commonwealth. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal testimony | Cosby was compelled to furnish self-incriminating testimony based on his reliance on the Commonwe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal ruling | The Superior Court concluded that Cosby was not immune from prosecution because D.A. Castor faile... | Commonwealth | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Cosby's deposition testimony in Constand's civil suit, where he decided not to invoke the Fifth A... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Police investigation | An initial investigation during which Attorney Schmitt allowed Cosby to give a statement to the p... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A habeas corpus hearing where the trial court viewed and heard witnesses and their testimonies re... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | D.A. Castor decides not to prosecute Cosby. | Pennsylvania (Implied by co... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cosby providing drugs to women. | Unspecified | View |
DOJ-OGR-00004848.jpg
This document page discusses the legal reasoning behind admitting "prior bad act" testimony and deposition evidence regarding Quaaludes to establish a common plan or scheme by Cosby. It highlights similarities between past incidents and the current allegations, such as the victims' age, relationship establishment, and consumption of substances, while citing Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 404(b) regarding character evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00004841.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (likely the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Commonwealth v. Cosby) filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It discusses the legal insufficiency of a 'press release' issued by D.A. Castor to grant immunity to Bill Cosby without court permission. The text cites Pennsylvania statutes regarding witness immunity and highlights the inconsistency of Castor's testimony regarding his intent.
DOJ-OGR-00004840.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Exhibit attached to Document 310-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on July 2, 2021. It presents an excerpt from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion ([J-100-2020]) regarding Commonwealth v. Cosby. The text analyzes whether former D.A. Castor had a valid non-prosecution agreement with Bill Cosby, concluding that the interaction was an 'unauthorized contemplation of transactional immunity' that did not comply with Pennsylvania statutes. This legal precedent regarding immunity deals is likely being cited in the Maxwell/Epstein proceedings to argue the validity or invalidity of similar non-prosecution agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00004836.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), though the text itself details the legal history of the Bill Cosby non-prosecution agreement (Commonwealth v. Cosby). It describes communications between former DA Bruce Castor and DA Risa Ferman regarding a 2005 agreement where the Commonwealth promised not to prosecute Cosby so that he could not invoke the Fifth Amendment in a civil deposition. This document was likely submitted by Maxwell's defense to argue legal precedent regarding the enforceability of non-prosecution agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00004832.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated July 2, 2021, detailing the history of Bill Cosby's case. It reproduces a trial court's summary of testimony from a 2016 habeas corpus hearing, focusing on former District Attorney Bruce L. Castor, Jr.'s 2005 decision-making process. The text recounts Castor's testimony about his investigation into Andrea Constand's allegations, including his rationale for assigning specific detectives and his assessment of the case's weaknesses, such as the delayed reporting and inconsistencies in statements.
DOJ-OGR-00004831.jpg
This document is a filing from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The text specifically discusses the legal history of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*, detailing how a former District Attorney (Castor) issued a non-prosecution declaration to force Bill Cosby to testify in a civil suit without Fifth Amendment protection. It describes how subsequent District Attorneys (Ferman and Steele) reopened the case and charged Cosby, leading to a habeas corpus petition based on the alleged non-prosecution agreement—a legal precedent likely being cited by Maxwell's defense regarding her own non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00004826.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically citing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion ([J-100-2020]) regarding Bill Cosby. It details the history of D.A. Bruce Castor's verbal non-prosecution decision in 2005, noting that because Cosby believed he had immunity, he did not invoke his Fifth Amendment rights during civil depositions. This legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) was likely used by the defense or prosecution in the Maxwell/Epstein case to argue the validity or scope of Epstein's own non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00004822.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically citing the Commonwealth v. Cosby case regarding District Attorney Bruce Castor's 2005 decision not to prosecute Bill Cosby. The text details Castor's reasoning, citing Andrea Constand's delay in reporting, inconsistencies in her statements, lack of forensic evidence found at the Cheltenham residence, and her continued contact with Cosby after the alleged assault. It notes that the pills provided by Cosby were confirmed to be Benadryl.
DOJ-OGR-00004820.jpg
This document details the events following Constad's police report accusing Cosby of sexual assault. It describes Constad's recorded phone calls with Cosby, where he offered career assistance and financial aid for her education, and his refusal to identify pills he had provided. The document also outlines subsequent communications from Cosby's associates and attorneys regarding invitations and a proposed trust, as well as the referral of Constad's police report through various police departments to Sergeant Richard Schaeffer.
DOJ-OGR-00004818.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal opinion (likely Commonwealth v. Cosby) filed as an exhibit in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details the narrative of Andrea Constand's sexual assault by Bill Cosby in January 2004, her departure from his residence the following morning, and a subsequent confrontation in March 2004 regarding the pills he gave her.
DOJ-OGR-00004817.jpg
This document is Page 5 of 80 from a court filing (Document 310-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. However, the text itself is an excerpt from a legal opinion or summary of facts regarding the case of Commonwealth v. Cosby (referencing Bill Cosby and Andrea Constand). It details a January 2004 incident where Cosby allegedly drugged Constand with three blue pills and wine at his Cheltenham residence.
DOJ-OGR-00004816.jpg
This document is a page from a filing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), but the text itself recounts the narrative of the Bill Cosby sexual assault case (Commonwealth v. Cosby, [J-100-2020]). It details the progression of the relationship between Andrea Constand and Bill Cosby, including meetings at Temple University, dinners at Cosby's Cheltenham residence involving unwanted physical contact, and a trip to Foxwoods Casino in late 2003. This document was likely filed in the Maxwell case as legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements or evidence of prior bad acts.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | Cosby | Unknown | $0.00 | Settled the case for a large sum of money. | View |
Discussion about sports broadcasting, education, meeting,...
Constad telephoned Cosby and secretly recorded the conversation, during which Cosby offered assistance for sports broadcasting, to pay for her education, and requested a meeting, while refusing to identify pills he had provided.
Discussion about sports broadcasting, education, meeting,...
Constad telephoned Cosby and secretly recorded the conversation, during which Cosby offered assistance for sports broadcasting, to pay for her education, and requested a meeting, while refusing to identify pills he had provided.
Testimony in civil action
Cosby provided four sworn depositions in a civil action, making several incriminating statements, under penalty of perjury, without Fifth Amendment privilege.
Testimony in civil action
Cosby provided four sworn depositions in a civil action, making several incriminating statements, under penalty of perjury, without Fifth Amendment privilege.
Renovations
Several telephone conversations concerning the renovations
Dessert invitation
Asked her to meet him for dessert in his [room]
Civil Litigation
Cosby sat for a civil deposition relying on overtures by Castor.
Pills
Stated he would write down name of pills.
Recorded conversations
Constand recorded telephone calls with Cosby.
Civil Case Testimony
Cosby was forced to sit for four depositions where he provided evidence regarding supplying women with depressants.
Criminal Investigation
Cosby voluntarily submitted to an interview providing a consent-based defense.
Response to concise statement of errors
Opinion issued pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a).
Dinner invitation
Dinner at a Philadelphia restaurant.
Temple University athletics
Discussion about issues involving Temple University athletics.
Career decision
Discussion regarding Constand leaving her job at Temple and returning to Canada.
Temple athletics and sports broadcasting
Discussions on customary topics in Cosby's room.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity