| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
MIT
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
SmithKline Beecham Corp.
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-01 | Court case | The ruling in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142, 162. | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 2012-01-01 | Legal case | The Supreme Court ruled in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp. | Supreme Court | View |
This document is a page from a legal filing that argues for a broad interpretation of "sexual abuse" under Section 3283. It cites multiple federal court cases to support the position that the term covers a wide range of offenses, including those without actual physical contact, as intended by Congress. The argument is used to justify that charges like transportation of a minor for an illegal sex act (Count Four) fall within this definition.
This document is a page from an index of a court transcript for the case "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.", dated February 15, 2012. The page provides an alphabetical list of words from "can" to "communicating" and the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document also contains case and document identification numbers in the header and footer.
This legal document, a page from a court filing, analyzes the definition of "sexual abuse" under federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. ยง 3509(a). It argues for a broad interpretation by citing several court cases, including decisions from the Supreme Court and various Circuit Courts. The document emphasizes that the definition is not limited to physical sexual contact but also includes actions like persuasion and inducement, and that the statutory examples are illustrative rather than exhaustive.
This document is page 7 of 239 (internally numbered 'vi') from a legal filing, Document 204 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of cases, listing legal precedents with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The footer includes a Department of Justice document identifier, DOJ-OGR-00002941.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity