DOJ-OGR-00002998.jpg

759 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
8
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 759 KB
Summary

This legal document, a page from a court filing, analyzes the definition of "sexual abuse" under federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 3509(a). It argues for a broad interpretation by citing several court cases, including decisions from the Supreme Court and various Circuit Courts. The document emphasizes that the definition is not limited to physical sexual contact but also includes actions like persuasion and inducement, and that the statutory examples are illustrative rather than exhaustive.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Carpenter
Party in the case citation 'United States v. Carpenter, 680 F.3d 1101, 1103-04 (9th Cir. 2012)'.
Vickers
Party in the case citation 'United States v. Vickers, No. 13 Cr. 128 (RJA) (HKS), 2014 WL 1838255, at *10 (W.D.N.Y. M...
Christopher
Party in the case citation 'Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142, 162 (2012)'.
Burgess
Party in the case citation 'Burgess v. United States, 552 U.S. 124, 131 n.3 (2008)'.
Schneider
Party in the case citation 'United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 197 (3d Cir. 2015)'.

Organizations (8)

Name Type Context
United States government agency
Party in multiple case citations: United States v. Carpenter, United States v. Vickers, Burgess v. United States, and...
9th Cir. court
Refers to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, mentioned in the citation for United States v. Ca...
W.D.N.Y. court
Refers to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, mentioned in the citation for United...
Congress government agency
Mentioned in the context of its choice of the word 'includes' in a statute, indicating legislative intent.
Supreme Court court
Mentioned as having held a position on the interpretation of the word 'includes' in statutes.
SmithKline Beecham Corp. company
Party in the case citation 'Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142, 162 (2012)'.
3d Cir. court
Refers to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, mentioned in the citation for United States v. Sc...
DOJ government agency
Appears in the footer as part of the document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00002998', likely standing for Department of Justice.

Timeline (5 events)

2008
The Supreme Court ruled in Burgess v. United States.
Supreme Court
2012
The 9th Circuit court ruled in United States v. Carpenter.
9th Cir.
2012
The Supreme Court ruled in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
Supreme Court
2014-05-08
The W.D.N.Y. court ruled in United States v. Vickers.
W.D.N.Y.
2015
The 3d Circuit court ruled in United States v. Schneider.
3d Cir.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Referenced by the abbreviation W.D.N.Y. in a case citation.

Key Quotes (4)

"the intentional touching, either directly or through clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify sexual desire of any person."
Source
— 18 U.S.C. § 3509(a)(9)(A) (The statutory definition of “sexual contact”.)
DOJ-OGR-00002998.jpg
Quote #1
"We join our sister circuits in looking to subsection 3509(a) for a definition of ‘sexual abuse’ under federal law, and find it the appropriate definition to use in applying section 3283’s extended statute of limitations."
Source
— United States v. Carpenter, 680 F.3d 1101, 1103-04 (9th Cir. 2012) (A quote from a 9th Circuit court decision on defining 'sexual abuse'.)
DOJ-OGR-00002998.jpg
Quote #2
"significant because it “makes clear that the examples enumerated in the text are intended to be illustrative, not exhaustive."
Source
— Supreme Court (in Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.) (Explaining the legal significance of Congress's use of the word 'includes'.)
DOJ-OGR-00002998.jpg
Quote #3
"as defined here encompasses a wider set of behavior than just rape or other unwanted sexual touching."
Source
— United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 197 (3d Cir. 2015) (A quote from a 3d Circuit court decision describing the breadth of the definition of sexual abuse.)
DOJ-OGR-00002998.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,275 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 64 of 239
explicit conduct or the rape, molestation, prostitution, or other form
of sexual exploitation of children, or incest with children.
18 U.S.C. § 3509(a)(8). The term “sexually explicit conduct” is in turn defined to mean, among
other things, “sexual intercourse, including sexual contact”; and the term “sexual contact” means
“the intentional touching, either directly or through clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast,
inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse
or gratify sexual desire of any person.” Id. § 3509(a)(9)(A). Courts have looked to the definition
of “sexual abuse” set forth in Section 3509(a) to determine whether the statute of limitations of
Section 3283 applies to an offense. United States v. Carpenter, 680 F.3d 1101, 1103-04 (9th Cir.
2012) (“We join our sister circuits in looking to subsection 3509(a) for a definition of ‘sexual
abuse’ under federal law, and find it the appropriate definition to use in applying section 3283’s
extended statute of limitations.”); United States v. Vickers, No. 13 Cr. 128 (RJA) (HKS), 2014 WL
1838255, at *10 (W.D.N.Y. May 8, 2014) (applying the definition of “sexual abuse” set forth in
Section 3509(a)).
As is evident from its plain text, the definition of “sexual abuse” set forth in Section 3509(a)
includes not only actual “sexual contact,” but also the “the employment, use, persuasion,
inducement, enticement, or coercion of a child to engage in, or assist another person to engage in,”
sexual contact. 18 U.S.C. § 3509(a). The breadth of this definition is underscored by Congress’s
use of the word “includes.” The Supreme Court has held that Congress’s choice of the word
“includes” is “significant because it “makes clear that the examples enumerated in the text are
intended to be illustrative, not exhaustive.” Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S.
142, 162 (2012) (citing Burgess v. United States, 552 U.S. 124, 131 n.3 (2008)). Thus, sexual
abuse “as defined here encompasses a wider set of behavior than just rape or other unwanted sexual
touching.” United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186, 197 (3d Cir. 2015). In keeping with that
37
DOJ-OGR-00002998

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document