Bruce A. Green
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Professor Dershowitz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
the Office
|
Advisor consultant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Adversarial professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Judicial correspondence |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Professional expert witness |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-07 | N/A | Affidavit signed by Bruce A. Green | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal service | Bruce A. Green's work as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in the case Giuffre v. Dersho... | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
055.pdf
A letter from Fordham Law Professor Bruce A. Green to Judge Richard Berman clarifying the record regarding a previous court hearing. Green asserts that contrary to comments made in court, he has never served as legal counsel for Jeffrey Epstein or his estate, although he did serve as an expert witness for Alan Dershowitz in a separate defamation case (Giuffre v. Dershowitz).
EFTA00011026.pdf
Judge Richard M. Berman writes to Professor Bruce A. Green regarding Green's recent Law Journal opinion piece which criticized the court's handling of the Epstein dismissal hearing. Judge Berman notes a potential undisclosed conflict of interest, revealing that Green had been retained as an ethics expert in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Dershowitz) to argue for the disqualification of David Boies, the attorney representing the victims whose speaking rights Green criticized in his article.
DOJ-OGR-00000726.jpg
Fordham law professor Bruce A. Green writes to Judge Richard M. Berman to correct a misunderstanding from an August 27, 2019, hearing in the case *United States v. Epstein*. Green clarifies that, contrary to the court's apparent understanding, he has never served as counsel for Epstein or his estate. He explains that his only involvement in a related matter was serving as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in a separate defamation case, a role that concluded in June 2019 and did not involve representation or advocacy.
DOJ-OGR-00010656.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 3 of the specific letter, page 65 of the filing) of a legal opinion written by Bruce A. Green. It addresses an ethical 'candor obligation' to inform the court about potential false information. The document was filed on June 24, 2022, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) and is marked subject to a protective order.
Legal Opinion / Ethical Obligations
Concluding page of a letter discussing a candor obligation to the court to prevent reliance on false information.
United States v. Epstein, 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
Bruce A. Green writes to Judge Berman to clarify the record regarding comments made in an August 27, 2019 hearing. He states he has never been counsel for Epstein, but did serve as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in a separate, related defamation case, a role which concluded in June and did not involve representation or advocacy.
United States v. Epstein, 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
Bruce A. Green writes to Judge Berman to clarify the record regarding comments made in an August 27, 2019 hearing. He states he has never been counsel for Epstein, but did serve as an expert witness for Professor Dershowitz in a separate, related defamation case, a role which concluded in June and did not involve representation or advocacy.
Clarification of record
Referenced in the opening of Berman's letter.
United States v. Epstein, 1:19-cr-00490-RMB
Clarification regarding comments made during the August 27, 2019 hearing about Green's involvement in Epstein-related cases.
The Judge in Epstein's Case Should Not Turn the Dismissal...
Opinion piece criticizing the Aug 27 hearing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity