David Boies
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Amanda Kramer
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Farmer
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Professor Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
identified victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
identified victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
women (unnamed accusers)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David S. Stone
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Opposing counsel negotiating parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. McCAWLEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA-1
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stanley Pottinger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ellen Brockman
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Eytan Avriel
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Dinner meeting involving The Clintons, Harvey Weinstein, Georgina Chapman, and David Boies | Rao's in Harlem | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Boies, Pottinger, Kessler, and NYT reporters. | BSF Office, Manhattan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Private admission by David Boies regarding false accusations. | Private setting | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged timeframe for the 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner claimed by Dershowitz. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Alan Dershowitz and David Boies where Dershowitz attempted to persuade Boies of h... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Meeting | David Boies approached the government to ask if the Southern District would consider charging Max... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A civil case was proceeding against the Defendant (Mr. Epstein). | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-26 | N/A | Conversation between AUSA and David Boies/Sigrid McCawley regarding press conduct during trial. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Upcoming arraignment/conference (implied date based on context of 'upcoming') | SDNY Court | View |
| 2021-04-21 | N/A | Arraignment Conference | Court (Physical and Phone) | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Appearance of attorneys David Boies and Sigrid S. McCawley representing victims. | Court Docket | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Attorney David Boies filed a Notice of Appearance in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Court filing | Notice of Appearance filed for David Boies on behalf of victims. | SDNY | View |
| 2020-05-18 | N/A | Plaintiff Annie Farmer files opposing response to Ghislaine Maxwell's request for pre-motion conf... | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-02-12 | N/A | David Boies denies defaming Alan Dershowitz regarding Epstein remarks. | Court Filing | View |
| 2019-11-30 | N/A | Publication of New York Times article regarding David Boies, Pottinger, and Jeffrey Epstein video... | New York Times (Online) | View |
| 2019-11-30 | N/A | New York Times publishes investigative report 'Jeffrey Epstein, Blackmail, and a Lucrative Hot Li... | New York Times (Publication) | View |
| 2019-11-20 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by David Boies | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-11-01 | N/A | Episode 22 of 'The Weekly' airs featuring interviews with Boies and Pottinger. | FX / Hulu | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Public hearing where Ms. Giuffre and Mr. Boies had a right to be heard under 18 U.S.C. § 3771. | Court | View |
| 2019-08-27 | Hearing | A court hearing in the case of United States v. Epstein, where the court commented on an article ... | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Hearing in United States v. Epstein | SDNY Court | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Public hearing in US v. Epstein | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court proceeding | A court proceeding for case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, where the listed individuals were present. | Southern District | View |
| 2019-07-15 | Court testimony | David Boies advised the Court about witnesses being contacted by Mr. Epstein or his lawyers and s... | Court | View |
055.pdf
A letter from Fordham Law Professor Bruce A. Green to Judge Richard Berman clarifying the record regarding a previous court hearing. Green asserts that contrary to comments made in court, he has never served as legal counsel for Jeffrey Epstein or his estate, although he did serve as an expert witness for Alan Dershowitz in a separate defamation case (Giuffre v. Dershowitz).
036.pdf
This document is a transcript of a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein held on July 15, 2019, in the SDNY. The government argued for detention based on flight risk (citing wealth, foreign ties, and a fake passport found in a safe) and danger to the community, while the defense argued for release on house arrest, citing his 14-year record of appearing for court and lack of recent convictions. Two victims, Annie Farmer and Courtney Wild, spoke in court opposing bail.
032.pdf
This document is a Decision & Order by U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman denying Jeffrey Epstein's request for pretrial release and granting the Government's motion for remand (detention). The Court concludes that the Government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that Epstein poses a danger to the community, citing testimony from victims and evidence of potential witness tampering and non-compliance with sex offender registration. Additionally, the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that Epstein is a flight risk due to his vast wealth, international ties, and the potential for a lengthy prison sentence, and determines that the defense's proposed bail package is inadequate to mitigate these risks.
024.pdf
Defense counsel Marc Fernich writes to Judge Berman to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's bail request, arguing against the government's stance that Epstein's wealth creates an irrebuttable presumption for detention. The letter proposes a forensic accounting by Joel Podgor, notes that Epstein's brother Mark is willing to secure a bond with his >$100 million net worth, clarifies Epstein's sex offender registration status in New Mexico, defends against claims regarding an expired Austrian passport, and argues that Epstein's return to the US despite media pressure proves he is not a flight risk.
022.pdf
Defense counsel Marc Fernich writes to Judge Berman to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's bail request, arguing that the government is incorrectly using Epstein's wealth to create an irrebuttable presumption of detention. The letter highlights that Epstein's brother, Mark, is willing to pledge his >$100 million net worth to secure bond, disputes the government's characterization of an expired Austrian passport, and clarifies Epstein's sex offender registration status in New Mexico. The defense also argues that Epstein did not flee despite intense media pressure in late 2018 and offers a forensic accounting of his finances.
2021.03.29%20Response%20-%20Response.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) on March 29, 2021, opposing the US Virgin Islands Government's appeal regarding their failed motion to intervene in probate proceedings. The executors argue the Government's petition is untimely as the original motion was denied over a year prior, and that the Government's emergency motion regarding estate assets is moot because the estate has replenished the Victims' Compensation Program funds. Attached exhibits include the original 2020 opposition brief and a March 2021 press release confirming the sale of Epstein's NYC and Palm Beach properties to fund the compensation program.
030.pdf
This document is a letter dated March 20, 2020, from attorney Joshua I. Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Paul G. Gardephe. It requests oral argument regarding the Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint in the case of Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York law and doctrines of equitable estoppel/tolling, contrary to the Defendants' assertions.
015.pdf
This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff outlines broad discovery requests, including Epstein's flight logs, helicopter logs, financial records, Amazon order history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators. The Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope of discovery strictly to the alleged abuse of the plaintiff and her damages, and the document outlines conflicting proposed deadlines for the discovery process.
013.pdf
Legal correspondence from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Gardephe regarding the case Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Plaintiff Teresa Helm's claims are timely under NY CPLR § 215(8)(a) due to the recent termination of Epstein's criminal case (August 2019) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel based on Epstein's intimidation and manipulation tactics. The letter also argues that challenges to punitive damages are premature at this stage of litigation.
009.pdf
A Waiver of the Service of Summons filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on November 27, 2019, in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke et al. Attorney Bennet Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP signed the waiver on November 25, 2019, on behalf of defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, acknowledging receipt of the complaint from plaintiff's attorney David Boies.
005.pdf
A Notice of Appearance filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters the case to represent plaintiff Teresa Helm in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
014.pdf
This document is a legal letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP on behalf of Plaintiff Maria Farmer in the case 'Farmer v. Indyke et al.' It argues against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Farmer's claims are timely under NY CPLR § 215(8)(a) because they were filed within one year of the termination of the criminal action against Jeffrey Epstein (Aug 29, 2019). The letter also argues that equitable estoppel applies due to threats made against Farmer, including a specific death threat involving the West Side Highway.
010.pdf
This document is a letter from Maria Farmer's legal counsel to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald opposing Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene in the case *Farmer v. Indyke et al.*. Dershowitz sought to intervene to strike Paragraph 39 of Farmer's complaint, which alleges that Farmer, while working at Epstein's NY mansion, saw Dershowitz go upstairs while young girls were present. The letter argues that Dershowitz has no right to intervene, that the allegations are relevant to the sex-trafficking conspiracy and Farmer's silence, and that the motion to strike is meritless.
008.pdf
This document is a Waiver of the Service of Summons filed on November 27, 2019, in the case of Maria Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke et al (Case No. 1:19-cv-10474-NRB) in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Bennet Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP signed the waiver on November 25, 2019, on behalf of defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, agreeing to waive formal service and respond to the complaint within 60 days. The waiver is addressed to plaintiff's attorney David Boies.
010-06.pdf
This document is Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's second amended supplemental response to discovery requests from Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 29, 2016. It details Giuffre's legal representation history from 2009 to 2016, listing specific attorneys and cases including actions against Jeffrey Epstein, the US Government, and Alan Dershowitz. The document also contains objections to requests for financial records regarding payments from Epstein or media organizations, asserting attorney-client privilege and irrelevance.
030.pdf
This document contains a letter from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman updating the court on the establishment of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. It attaches a Status Report filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands and the detailed Protocol for the Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, which outlines eligibility, claims administration, evaluation methodology, and compensation procedures for sexual abuse victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
026.pdf
This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The Plaintiff requests broad discovery including flight logs, financial records, Amazon history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators, while the Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope strictly to the Plaintiff's alleged abuse. The document outlines proposed deadlines for document requests, HIPAA releases, and expert discovery, noting significant disagreements between the parties on the timing of these phases.
025.pdf
A legal letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Lorna G. Schofield arguing against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York Law (CPLR § 215(8)(a) and § 213-c) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel due to Epstein's intimidation tactics. It also asserts that punitive damages should be addressed after discovery.
011.pdf
This document is a Waiver of the Service of Summons filed on November 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for Case 1:19-cv-10577-LGS (Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke et al). Attorney Bennet Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP signs on behalf of defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of the Epstein estate), acknowledging receipt of the complaint and agreeing to waive formal service. The waiver is addressed to plaintiff's attorney David Boies.
009.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on November 20, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel for the Plaintiff, Jane Doe 1000, in a civil case against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein.
007.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, supporting a motion for 'Jane Doe 1000' to proceed anonymously in her civil suit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff alleges she was sexually trafficked and abused by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing forced sexual acts and the use of sex toys. The motion argues that anonymity is necessary to protect the plaintiff from severe emotional distress, public scrutiny, and potential retaliation from Maxwell, who was described as being 'at large' at the time of the filing.
006.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously' filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 1000, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The filing is submitted by attorneys from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.
013.pdf
This document is a letter from plaintiff's counsel (Boies Schiller Flexner) to Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr. in the case *Bryant v. Indyke et al.*, dated January 29, 2020. The letter argues against the defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Juliette Bryant's claims are timely under New York statutes (CPLR § 215(8)(a) and § 213-c) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel due to Epstein's intimidation tactics. It details that Bryant was a resident of New York during the abuse (2002-2005 era) and was raped repeatedly by Epstein at his New York home.
010.pdf
A joint letter dated January 10, 2020, from legal counsel representing plaintiffs (victims) and defendants (Epstein Estate executors) to Judge Debra Freeman. The letter provides a status update on discovery schedules and settlement discussions, specifically noting the development of a Victims' Compensation Program awaiting approval in the US Virgin Islands. The parties request a court conference in early February 2020.
005.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on November 20, 2019, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters his appearance as counsel for the plaintiff, Juliette Bryant, in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
Maxwell Perjury Evidence
We have her dead to rights.
Statements about Ms. Maxwell's potential cooperation
Attorney David Boies made public statements speculating that Maxwell would be under 'tremendous pressure to cooperate' and could shed light on Epstein's dealings.
Perjury charges
Asking if SDNY would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.
Bar complaint withdrawal
Threatened that unless Dershowitz withdrew a bar complaint, Boies would find another woman to accuse him.
Perjury Charge
Statement regarding Maxwell: 'We have her dead to rights.'
Maxwell's potential cooperation
Speculation on Maxwell cooperating to reduce sentence and exposing others involved with Epstein.
Legal arguments regarding stay of discovery
Arguments against Maxwell's motion to stay discovery and motion to dismiss; references to Judge Schofield's previous comments.
Annie Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, & Ghis...
Argument opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay discovery pending criminal investigation.
Confidential settlement conference
Confidential telephonic settlement conference between Dershowitz and David Boies. Dershowitz produced a recording of this call, which Plaintiff alleges was unauthorized and violates the Wiretap Act.
Waiver of the Service of Summons
Agreement to waive service of summons and complaint in Case 1:19-cv-10577-LGS.
Waiver of the Service of Summons
Agreement to waive service of summons and acknowledgement of deadline to file an answer.
Witness Tampering
Advising the court about witness tampering in civil cases (7/15/19 Tr. at 71).
Perjury charges against Maxwell
David Boies approached the government in the summer of 2016 asking if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.
Re: Possible Statement (Quoted)
Asking if they have given up on a 'mutually acceptable statement from VR or you' and urging to keep trying.
Re: Possible Statement
Proposing specific wording for a settlement statement where the accuser admits the possibility of mistaken identification regarding 'AD'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity