Trove
Sign In Sign Up

P. Kevin Castel

Person
Mentions
6
Relationships
0
Events
1
Documents
3
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2019-09-11 N/A Judge Castel grants Plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. New York, New York View

025.pdf

This document is a letter dated October 29, 2019, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter represents the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) and associated corporate entities in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al. It serves to clarify the record regarding an ex parte order issued in a related case (Katlyn Doe) and requests an extension until November 15, 2019, to respond to the Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Anonymously.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

024-01.pdf

This document is a Court Order from the SDNY dated September 11, 2019, in the case of Katlyn Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Judge P. Kevin Castel grants the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously using the pseudonym 'Katlyn Doe.' The court determines that the highly sensitive nature of the allegations—involving sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein beginning when the plaintiff was a minor—and the risk of further psychological harm outweigh the public interest in disclosure.

Court order (united states district court southern district of new york)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source

024-01.pdf

This document is a legal motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, requesting that Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' be allowed to proceed anonymously in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The motion argues that the sensitive nature of the sexual assault allegations, the risk of retaliation due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the lack of public interest in her specific identity outweigh the presumption of open proceedings. Attached as Exhibit A is a September 11, 2019 Order from Judge P. Kevin Castel in a similar case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke), which granted anonymity under nearly identical circumstances.

Legal motion and supporting memorandum of law (with attached court order exhibit)
2025-12-26
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search