| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Catherine M. Conrad
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-06-04 | Legal filing | Affirmation of Victor M. Serby in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint in Co... | N/A | View |
This document is a table of contents or index of exhibits for a legal filing dated February 24, 2012, related to the case of Conrad v. Manessis. It lists various court documents, testimony, correspondence, and affidavits filed between 2009 and 2011. Key individuals mentioned include the parties Conrad and Manessis, as well as attorneys and witnesses such as Victor M. Serby, Catherine Conrad, Susan E. Brune, and Paul H. Schoeman.
This document is Page 2 of a 2010 New York court decision (Slip Op. 09090) regarding the suspension of attorney Catherine M. Conrad. The text details her suspension due to alcohol dependency and mental infirmity, denying her immediate reinstatement but converting her suspension to medical grounds. While part of a larger filing (Case 1:20-cv-03388-PAE) likely related to the Epstein/Maxwell litigation, this specific page serves as a legal precedent or exhibit regarding attorney conduct and fitness.
This document is an index of exhibits and legal filings, primarily related to the court case 'Conrad v. Manessis'. It lists various documents such as court orders, affirmations, testimony excerpts, affidavits, and correspondence dated between February 2009 and September 2011. The index provides a chronological overview of key submissions and events in the litigation, referencing individuals like Susan E. Brune, Judge Pauley, and Victor M. Serby, as well as entities like the Federal Election Commission.
This legal document is a court order from the First Judicial Department regarding attorney Catherine M. Conrad. The court grants the Departmental Disciplinary Committee's motion to suspend Conrad indefinitely due to a medical disability related to her admitted alcohol dependency. The court denies Conrad's cross-motion for immediate reinstatement, stating she has not yet met the burden of proving her fitness to resume the practice of law.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity