Mr. Acosta
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Superior subordinate |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
CEOS
|
Professional bureaucratic |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal in Florida. | Florida | View |
| 2008-05-19 | N/A | CEOS Review | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Agreement | Mr. Acosta agreed that written notice of the state change of plea would not be provided to victim... | N/A | View |
EFTA00013855.pdf
A letter from Jay P. Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis to the US Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) dated June 19, 2009. The letter seeks to clarify ambiguous provisions within Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically Paragraph 8 regarding waivers of liability and potential civil claims. Lefkowitz argues that the waiver applies to single violations rather than multiple asserted violations and reserves the right to use statute of limitations defenses.
EFTA00013738.pdf
An email dated September 11, 2007, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS) to Gerald Lefcourt regarding a 'Revised Agreement re Epstein'. The sender attaches the '070911_Epstein_Non-Prosecution_Agreement.pdf' and notes that the revision was requested by Mr. Acosta but the operative terms remain unchanged.
DOJ-OGR-00022704.tif
This document is an excerpt from an interview transcript, likely a deposition or testimony, involving Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche, with a brief interjection from David Markus. The discussion covers Jeffrey Epstein's alleged ties to intelligence agencies, his relationships with various individuals including Ehud Barak and his brother Mark Epstein, his health conditions (heart and testosterone use), and questions surrounding his legal plea deal in Florida involving Bill Barr and Mr. Acosta, as well as his death.
DOJ-OGR-00000519.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, concerning a bail proceeding for Mr. Epstein. The speaker discusses the government's arguments for detention, citing a recent search of Epstein's home on the Upper East Side and his arrest. The key point is the government's allegation of witness tampering, supported by evidence of two large payments ($250,000 and $100,000) made to Epstein's associates shortly after a Miami Herald story was published about the case and the role of former U.S. Attorney Mr. Acosta.
DOJ-OGR-00021436.jpg
This document describes the events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea in a Florida state court on June 30, 2008, at which no victims were present. It details how federal prosecutors, including Villafaña, Sloman, and Acosta, deliberately withheld written victim notifications until after the plea, based on a prior agreement. The text also notes that while subpoenas were issued to some victims, the State's efforts to ensure their participation or notification before the hearing were minimal or ineffective.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025354.jpg
This document is page 2 of a letter dated May 19, 2008, addressed to the Honorable Mark Filip from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. The letter argues against federal prosecution, citing a review by CEOS (Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section) initiated by Mr. Acosta which found that while prosecution wasn't impossible, it relied on a 'novel application' of federal law. The authors allege that the USAO in Miami is engaging in misconduct, specifically by commingling criminal law with a civil remedy intended to profit specific lawyers, and request a senior-level review by the Justice Department.
Unknown
Acknowledged that language of Paragraph 8 is 'far from simple'.
Unknown
Acknowledged that language of Paragraph 8 is 'far from simple'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity