| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Shlomo Ben-Ami
|
Counterparts coordinators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Shlomo Ben-Ami
|
Security counterparts |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Shlomo Ben-Ami
|
Security coordination |
5
|
1 |
This is a page from a legal document (Westlaw printout, stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023404) regarding the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It contains legal arguments requesting the court defer decision on TVPA (Torture Victim Protection Act) claims pending a Supreme Court decision, and argues that organizations (not just individuals) should be liable under the TVPA. It also argues that the lower court improperly dismissed negligence and intentional tort claims related to the 9/11 attacks. While the prompt identifies this as 'Epstein-related,' the visible text strictly concerns 9/11 litigation case law and corporate liability, likely included in the House Oversight files as legal precedent or research material.
This document is page 43 of a legal opinion or brief from 2012 titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It discusses the legal liability of entities under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) for providing material support and financing to al-Qaeda. The text argues that the District Court erred in dismissing claims against banks (Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, National Commercial Bank) on the grounds that corporations cannot be sued as individuals under the TVPA, citing various precedents including 'Khulumani' and 'Mohamad v. Rajoub'. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation production.
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing, marked with Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023368. It lists various legal precedents and case citations, primarily focusing on litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, sovereign immunity, and international liability (Alien Tort Statute). While the document is part of a collection likely reviewed by the House Oversight Committee (possibly related to an investigation involving Epstein or similar legal themes of jurisdiction/immunity), this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates.
This document is a page from a manuscript (likely Ehud Barak's memoir) describing the events leading up to the Second Intifada in September 2000. It details the political maneuvering behind Ariel Sharon's controversial visit to the Temple Mount, the security consultations Barak held with Israeli officials and Palestinian counterparts, and the subsequent outbreak of violence despite US diplomatic intervention. The text highlights the tense political atmosphere following the collapse of Camp David and attributes the escalation of violence to Arafat's inaction.
Rajoub asked for two conditions: not on a Friday, and not entering mosques.
Rajoub asked for no Friday visit and no entering mosques
Rajoub asked for no Friday visit and no entry into mosques; Shlomo agreed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity