| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Employment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Custodial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Detainee detainer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sophia Papapetru
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Inmate custodian |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Incarceration |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
MCC New York
|
Shared status |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Inmate facility |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-18 | Provision of equipment | The Government provided the MDC Brooklyn with a laptop for Ms. Maxwell to use to review discovery. | Metropolitan Detention Cent... | View |
A letter dated November 6, 2021, from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams' office to the Legal Department at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn. The letter conveys a password for a digital drive containing witness materials relevant to the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
Defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell requests the Court to order the government to disclose the identities of three alleged victims referenced in the indictment to allow for effective investigation of allegations from 25 years ago. Additionally, the defense requests that Maxwell be moved to the general population at the MDC and given increased computer access to review discovery, arguing her current isolation and surveillance are punitive reactions to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in BOP custody.
This document is an email chain from November 1-2, 2020, detailing a complaint from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, regarding prison conditions at the MDC. Sternheim alleges the cell is cold, smells of sewage, has moisture issues, and that Maxwell was denied basic items like a water mug and extra blanket. Government officials investigated and responded internally that temperature checks showed the cell was 71-74 degrees (warmer than the 68-degree target), no moisture or smell was found, and she was provided an extra blanket.
This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, to Judge Alison Nathan, dated November 24, 2020. It details complaints about Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC, including harsh quarantine measures after COVID-19 exposure, lack of basic hygiene items like soap and a toothbrush, deletion of legal emails, and sleep deprivation due to flashlight checks every 15 minutes. The letter concludes with a request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez, followed by a court order from Judge Nathan requiring the parties to meet and confer on the matter.
This document is an email chain between officials from the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office and likely the BOP/USMS regarding the arrest and detention of Ghislaine Maxwell on July 2, 2020. The correspondence discusses her immediate housing in New Hampshire, safety precautions citing 'the history here' (likely referencing Epstein), and the plan to transfer her to MDC Brooklyn. The emails confirm she was in a local facility in New Hampshire and scheduled for a virtual presentation.
This document is an email chain between US Attorneys regarding a judicial inquiry into why Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC) received significantly better legal access than Justin Rivera (at MCC). Judge Engelmayer called the disparity 'terrible' optics. The BOP's explanation was that Maxwell's protective custody status (isolation) allowed her exclusive use of equipment, whereas Rivera was in the general population sharing limited resources with ~80 other inmates. The emails track the drafting of a declaration to explain this to the court by the December 31, 2020 deadline.
This document is a legal declaration by Nicole McFarland, a Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC), filed on August 5, 2020, in the case of The New York Times v. Federal Bureau of Prisons. It details the steps taken by MCC staff to search for records requested under FOIA regarding Jeffrey Epstein, including SHU logs, video footage, suicide watch records, and phone logs. McFarland testifies that critical evidence, such as SHU logs and video footage, was transferred to the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) and the FBI in August 2019, and that no recordings of Epstein's phone calls exist.
This document is an email chain within the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) discussing a legal challenge in the case United States v. Rivera. The judge and defense counsel questioned why Ghislaine Maxwell (at MDC) received significantly greater access to laptops (13 hours/day vs 3) and video counsel visits than Justin Rivera (at MCC). The correspondence outlines the Bureau of Prisons' justification, attributing the disparity to Maxwell's protective custody status and massive discovery volume versus Rivera's general population housing.
This document is an internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding a legal issue raised by Judge Engelmayer in the case *United States v. Rivera*. The Judge criticized the disparity between the extensive discovery and counsel access provided to Ghislaine Maxwell at MDC Brooklyn (91 hours/week laptop access) versus the limited access provided to Justin Rivera at MCC New York (21 hours/week). The emails discuss drafting a declaration to explain that these differences are due to Maxwell's unique protective custody status and facility capabilities, rather than preferential treatment based on class or race.
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties providing Maxwell with discovery materials at the MDC (CDs vs. Hard Drives), a request for an unredacted 2006 FBI report found on Epstein's devices, and missing pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (specifically pages 1-27). The defense also questions the government about a Daily Beast article referencing a 'newly unsealed' affidavit regarding a cell-site simulator used to track Maxwell.
This legal document, filed by BOP Staff Attorneys from MDC Brooklyn, addresses concerns regarding the confinement conditions of inmate Ms. Maxwell. It details her compliance with search procedures, meal schedules, health status (including weight and COVID-19 safety), and access to social and legal communications.
This legal document excerpt details the defense's arguments on behalf of Ms. Maxwell regarding her treatment at MDC Brooklyn. The defense claims the government and court are unfairly handling evidence, specifically a videotape of an incident that would allegedly disprove statements made by MDC staff. The document also highlights the defense's frustration with the court's dismissal of their complaints about jail conditions, such as guards flashing a light in Ms. Maxwell's cell every 15 minutes.
This page from a legal document, dated May 17, 2021, argues that defendant Ghislaine Maxwell is enduring 'tortuous conditions' during her 10-month detention at MDC Brooklyn. It highlights sleep deprivation caused by flashlight searches every 15 minutes and includes a before-and-after photo to show the alleged physical deterioration of Maxwell. The filing quotes MDC legal counsel stating Maxwell cannot be provided with an eye mask.
This legal document, filed on July 9, 2021, is a request from Sophia Papapetru, a Staff Attorney for the Federal Bureau of Prisons at MDC Brooklyn. She asks the presiding judge ('Your Honor') to vacate a previous order from January 15, 2021, and permit the institution to revert to its former laptop access schedule of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM on weekdays.
This document is a letter from BOP Staff Attorneys at MDC Brooklyn addressing the court regarding the conditions of Ms. Maxwell's confinement. It details her compliance with COVID-19 protocols, meal schedules, health status, and access to legal and social communications.
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from Jan 26 to Feb 4, 2021. It details significant pre-trial activity, including the filing of twelve pre-trial motions by the defense, disputes over laptop access at the MDC Brooklyn involving the Bureau of Prisons, and specific motions to suppress evidence and dismiss charges (counts 1-6). The document highlights the involvement of various AUSAs, defense attorneys, and Judge Alison J. Nathan in managing redactions and discovery disputes.
This document is a court docket log from the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details various legal filings, including government letters regarding laptop access at MDC Brooklyn, a denial of a BOP request to vacate an order, and multiple defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss specific counts of the indictment. The document highlights the active legal maneuvering regarding redactions, detention conditions, and pre-trial dismissal attempts.
This document is a court docket report from the SDNY detailing filings in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between January 25, 2021, and February 4, 2021. It lists numerous motions to dismiss filed by the defense, letters regarding confidentiality redactions, and a dispute regarding the defendant's access to a laptop at the MDC Brooklyn, which the judge resolved by denying the BOP's request to vacate a prior order. The document also notes a motion to suppress evidence obtained via a subpoena to a redacted entity.
This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from January 25, 2021, to February 2, 2021. It lists numerous pretrial motions filed by the defense, including motions to dismiss specific counts and requests for separate trials, as well as government correspondence regarding redactions and prison access. The document also includes judicial orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan, including a denial of a request by the Bureau of Prisons regarding a previous court order.
This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between January 25, 2021, and February 2, 2021. It details the defense filing twelve pre-trial motions, including requests for separate trials, dismissal of counts due to multiplicity and lack of specificity, and dismissal based on Sixth Amendment violations. The document also records a dispute involving the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and MDC Brooklyn regarding laptop access for the defendant, resulting in the Judge denying the BOP's request to vacate a previous order.
This legal document, filed on February 8, 2021, is a request from Sophia Papapetru, a Staff Attorney for the Federal Bureau of Prisons at MDC Brooklyn. The filing asks a judge ('Your Honor') to vacate a previous court order from January 15, 2021, and permit the institution to revert to its former schedule for laptop access, which was Monday through Friday, 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM.
This document is page 2 of a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Sophia Papapetru, a Staff Attorney for the Federal Bureau of Prisons at MDC Brooklyn, requests the judge vacate an order from January 15, 2021, and restore the previous schedule for laptop access (Monday through Friday, 7:00 AM – 8:00 PM), presumably for the defendant's legal preparation.
This document is page 3 of a court filing (Document 117) dated January 25, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Sophia Papapetru, a Staff Attorney for the Federal Bureau of Prisons at MDC Brooklyn, requests the Judge vacate a previous order from January 15, 2021, and restore a specific schedule for laptop access (7:00 AM – 8:00 PM, M-F) for the defendant.
This document is a court docket sheet from the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details procedural battles regarding the redaction of sensitive information in pre-trial motions and disputes over Maxwell's access to a laptop at the MDC Brooklyn detention center. The defense filed multiple significant motions on February 4, 2021, including motions to suppress evidence from a subpoena to a redacted party and motions to dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment based on pre-indictment delay and arguments that alleged misstatements were not perjurious.
This document is a court docket sheet from early 2021 (Jan 26 - Feb 4) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details various filings including letters regarding redactions and laptop access at the MDC, and significant defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss multiple counts of the indictment. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders regarding redaction timelines and denied a request by the Bureau of Prisons to vacate a previous order.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity