This document is a court docket report from the SDNY detailing filings in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between January 25, 2021, and February 4, 2021. It lists numerous motions to dismiss filed by the defense, letters regarding confidentiality redactions, and a dispute regarding the defendant's access to a laptop at the MDC Brooklyn, which the judge resolved by denying the BOP's request to vacate a prior order. The document also notes a motion to suppress evidence obtained via a subpoena to a redacted entity.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court case and filer of multiple motions to dismiss.
|
| Jeffrey Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Attorney filing motions on behalf of Maxwell (Entries 122, 123, 124, 133).
|
| Mark Cohen | Defense Attorney |
Attorney filing motions on behalf of Maxwell (Entries 125, 126).
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Presiding Judge issuing orders and receiving letters.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Prosecutor sending letters to the Judge.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Prosecutor sending letters to the Judge.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Prosecutor sending letters to the Judge.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Prosecutor sending letters to the Judge.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Attorney filing letter opposing the MDC letter.
|
| Sophia Papapetru | Staff Attorney |
Attorney for MDC Brooklyn (Bureau of Prisons) requesting the court vacate an order.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York (Court jurisdiction).
|
|
| USA |
United States of America (The Government/Prosecution).
|
|
| MDC Brooklyn |
Metropolitan Detention Center where Maxwell was held.
|
|
| Federal Bureau of Prisons |
Government agency overseeing MDC Brooklyn, referred to as BOP.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Detention facility involved in laptop access dispute.
|
|
|
Court jurisdiction.
|
"MOTION to Dismiss Counts One through Four of the Superseding Indictment for Lack of Specificity."Source
"MOTION to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment as it was Obtained in Violation of the Sixth Amendment."Source
"the Court hereby DENIES the BOP's request to vacate the Order."Source
"MOTION to Suppress Under the Due Process Clause All Evidence Obtained from the Governments Subpoena to REDACTED"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,649 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document