This document details the events surrounding the publication of Edward Snowden's NSA leaks in June 2013, describing how journalists verified his credibility using code phrases and the subsequent interactions with government officials before publication. It recounts the release of the Verizon and PRISM stories by the Guardian and Washington Post, followed by Snowden's decision to reveal his identity through a video interview to define his own narrative before the government could demonize him.
This document appears to be a page from a report or narrative (marked House Oversight) detailing the logistics and communications leading up to the publication of the Edward Snowden NSA leaks in June 2013. It describes the coordination between Snowden, Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, and The Guardian (represented by 'Gibson' and Ewen MacAskill), including travel to Hong Kong and the setup of a contingency website with a 'dead man's switch.' The text focuses on Snowden's motivations, his specific instructions to journalists, and the editorial decisions made by The Guardian regarding Snowden's manifesto versus the NSA documents.
This document appears to be a page (185) from a geopolitical manuscript or white paper discussing network theory, 'Hard Gatekeeping,' and the balance of power between the US and China. It references historical hegemony and political science theories by Kauffman, Little, and Wohlforth. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was produced as evidence in a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a book or manuscript (specifically referencing 'The Seventh Sense,' a concept and likely book title) analyzing US-China relations through the lens of network theory. It argues that China is not currently a military threat to the US but faces significant internal demographic and economic challenges. The text draws parallels to the diplomatic rapprochement of the 1970s, citing Nixon and Kissinger's efforts to engage with Zhou Enlai to avoid Chinese isolation. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation, potentially related to documents possessed by or sent to Epstein associates.
This text outlines a grand strategy for US foreign policy regarding China, advocating for a "gatekept order" rather than direct containment. It argues for creating a strong network based on US values that other nations can join conditionally, while urging cooperation on global issues to avoid fatal conflict. The passage also introduces the concept of "Seventh Sense" logic, comparing geopolitical shifts to complex adaptive systems in nature.
This document (page 180, Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018412) appears to be a page from a geopolitical strategy manuscript or policy paper. It analyzes US-China relations, arguing that traditional containment strategies are failing (citing the AIIB example from 2014) and discussing cultural differences in transparency ('diamonds vs jade'). The author proposes that the greatest threat is not a specific nation but the 'evolution of the network itself' and suggests a grand strategy of 'Hard Gatekeeping' modeled after Metternich's 'Concert of Nations'.
The text explores the geopolitical tension between the United States and China, comparing their relationship to historical rivalries like Germany and Great Britain to illustrate the dangers of the "security dilemma." It discusses how each nation's pursuit of security often leads to mutual insecurity and highlights their fundamentally different perceptions of the current global order—America viewing it as sustainable and beneficial, while China sees it as broken and in need of reconstruction ("Da po, Da li").
A page from a manuscript or philosophical essay discussing geopolitical strategy, specifically the concept of 'gatelands' and open vs. closed systems. The author argues that American influence should rely on the magnetic appeal of its superior economic and technical systems rather than force, referencing Gresham's Law and the history of global trade. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production related to a congressional investigation.
This document is page 156 of a book or manuscript, likely titled 'The Seventh Sense' (based on the text), bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. The text discusses political theory, the definition of power ('Macht' as defined by Max Weber), and the concept of a 'Seventh Sense' needed to understand modern networks, referencing entities like Facebook, Bitcoin, and operating systems as 'gated' worlds. It does not contain specific references to Jeffrey Epstein, flight logs, or financial transactions on this specific page.
This document serves as a narrative summary of the tense negotiations between the US Attorney's Office (Acosta, Sloman) and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Lefkowitz, Starr) around 2008. It details how Epstein's lawyers aggressively pressured the government to prevent victim notification, leading to a secret non-prosecution agreement while the FBI briefly continued investigating in NY and NM. The text notes that in 2013, the government finally admitted they backed down on victim notifications due to objections from Epstein's attorneys.
This document is a Bank of America Merrill Lynch report from its '2016 Future of Financials Conference' on November 17, 2016. It analyzes the financial outlook for Associated Bancorp (ASB), detailing management's perspective on growth in the Midwest, opportunities in commercial real estate (CRE), and M&A strategies. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is an email chain from May 2018 where Steve Bannon forwards a news alert to Jeffrey Epstein's known email address (jeevacation@gmail.com). The forwarded article from the Associated Press reports that Trump confidant Tom Barrack was interviewed by Robert Mueller's investigators, with Bannon adding the comment, 'Gates served this brother up,' implying Rick Gates's cooperation led to Barrack's questioning.
This document is an email from Jes Staley to Jeffrey Epstein dated September 26, 2014. Staley briefly acknowledges an article Epstein had sent him about Kathryn Ruemmler, a former White House counsel being considered for Attorney General. The forwarded text details Ruemmler's qualifications, her close advisory role to President Obama, and potential political obstacles to her nomination, such as her involvement in the I.R.S. and Benghazi controversies.
This document is a page from an article or report discussing United States government performance and social policy during the Obama administration. It focuses on the concept of social impact bonds as a tool for improving program effectiveness, mentioning a proposed $100 million pilot program and citing critiques from Jon Baron of the Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. Contrary to the user's prompt, this document contains no information whatsoever related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a December 2018 email chain where author Michael Wolff advises Jeffrey Epstein on public relations strategy. Wolff responds to a forwarded defense statement written by Ken Starr, who argues Epstein's plea deal was justified and not a 'sweetheart deal'. Wolff suggests leveraging Epstein's connection to former President Clinton and framing the story's resurgence as a political attack on then-Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, the former prosecutor in the case.
This document is a December 15, 2018 email chain revealing a discussion about public relations strategy for Jeffrey Epstein. The chain includes a forwarded message from Ken Starr, who calls Epstein a 'now-friend' and provides a drafted defense of his controversial plea deal, framing it as a state matter with federal overreach. Correspondents Michael Wolff and Matthew Hiltzik discuss strategic messaging, including whether to invoke Epstein's Clinton connection, target Trump official Alex Acosta, and have Epstein admit some wrongdoing.
This document, labeled HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028434, is the source data for a web article about Brett Kavanaugh's 2018 Supreme Court nomination. It details controversial entries in his 1983 high school yearbook, specifically references to "Renate" (Renate Schroeder Dolphin), allegations of sexual assault by Christine Blasey Ford, and a letter of support for Kavanaugh that Dolphin co-signed. Despite the prompt's framing of the document as 'Epstein-related', its content is entirely about Brett Kavanaugh and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a political analysis article from 2018 concerning the Senate confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh. It details the political strategies and potential fallout for both Republicans and Democrats following the sexual assault accusation made by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. The article includes quotes from political figures and commentators, discusses the risks for senators on the Judiciary Committee, and draws parallels to the 1992 confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas.
This document is a news article dated September 24, 2018, reporting on Google CEO Sundar Pichai's plan to meet with top GOP lawmakers, including House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy. The meeting was organized to address concerns regarding Google's alleged bias against conservatives, user privacy violations, and business dealings with China. Contrary to the user's query, this document contains no information, names, or events related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, an apparent news article or summary from around September 2018, analyzes the intense speculation and conflicting reports about whether Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had resigned or was about to be fired by President Trump. The chaos reportedly stemmed from news that Rosenstein had previously suggested recording Trump, with the article noting that Rosenstein's job status remained uncertain pending a scheduled meeting with the President.
This document is an email sent from Jeffrey Epstein ('JEE') to Leon Black on May 23, 2017. The email provides information about a 'high-powered attorney' named Weingarten, noting his professional background, his connection to the Democratic party, and his close friendship with former Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. The email concludes by mentioning that 'four finalists' and the White House had no comment on an unspecified matter.
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein to Raafat Alsabbagh dated June 2, 2016. Epstein asks for feedback on an attached draft letter and proposes taking an individual named 'Mohammed' to visit the labs at MIT to see robotics and AI, framing it as seeing 'the future' after Mohammed had seen 'the past in Washington with Obama'.
This document is an email from Andrew Grossman, a Partner at bakerlaw.com, containing an excerpt from a June 23, 2018, article. The article argues that the Special Counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller should be paused, alleging that the preceding 'Crossfire' investigation was politically motivated with an anti-Trump bias. This document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, an excerpt from a House Oversight report, argues against the narrative of Trump-Russia collusion, citing a lack of evidence and suggesting political bias in the FBI's 'Crossfire' investigation. It details pre-election efforts by figures like Harry Reid and media outlets to publicize the collusion story through letters to the FBI and reporting on the Steele dossier. The document is about the 2016 US presidential election and is not related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document, from a House Oversight source, argues that the FBI's 'Crossfire Hurricane' investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign was politically motivated and an abuse of power. It cites public letters from Harry Reid and other Democrats, as well as actions by Christopher Steele, as part of a pre-election effort to publicize the Trump-Russia narrative. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity