| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
The Author
|
Spouse |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Spousal |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Author moved to Cambridge with wife and two sons. | Cambridge, MA | View |
| N/A | N/A | Diagnosis of second testicular cancer (seminoma) found by wife, followed by radiation treatment. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton attended Jewish High Holiday services. | Whaling Church, Edgartown, ... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | AAAS Conference; Author and wife gave student a lift in a taxi | AAAS Conference location | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | AAAS Conference attendance. | Unknown | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | AAAS Conference | Unknown (AAAS Conference lo... | View |
This document, marked as a House Oversight record, appears to be a manuscript excerpt dated April 2, 2012. It recounts an event in 1993 where the author (a Yale Law alum living on Martha's Vineyard) invited President Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton to Rosh Hashanah services. The document includes the text of the invitation letter and describes the service at the Whaling Church in Edgartown, noting that Clinton was the first sitting president to attend such a service.
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript or personal essay (likely by Alan Dershowitz, based on the reference to his book 'The Case for Israel'). The text discusses the author's philosophy on free speech, his defense of unpopular clients ('sons of bitches'), and his personal experiences with defamation and legal challenges. It includes a word count header and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be page 175 of a personal memoir or manuscript, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. The unidentified author details a traumatic medical history involving two separate instances of testicular cancer, radical surgery, and radiation therapy that resulted in severe chronic pain and spinal issues. The text connects this physical suffering to a spiritual awakening, comparing the author's experience to that of Brother Lawrence and describing a shift away from 'narcissistic preoccupations' toward a 'God-oriented place'.
This document is a detailed written rebuttal by a male academic (likely Lawrence Krauss based on biographical details like the move from Case to ASU to ANU) responding to specific allegations of misconduct numbered 1 through 6. The author denies the allegations, clarifying that a 'female companion' was his wife, describing a student relationship as professional mentorship, and citing university investigations (ASU and ANU) that cleared him of wrongdoing regarding a 2016 'selfie' incident. The text highlights the author's frustration with anonymous third-party complaints and alleged violations of confidentiality agreements regarding past HR matters.
This document is a detailed rebuttal written by a high-profile scientist/professor (identifiable as Lawrence Krauss by context) responding to a list of sexual harassment allegations provided by a reporter or investigator. The author systematically denies or clarifies six specific items, including a 2006 hotel encounter he claims was consensual/platonic, and a 2008 complaint by a student at Case Western Reserve University which he argues was informal and resolved. He also references investigations by ASU and ANU which he claims cleared him of wrongdoing regarding third-party anonymous complaints.
This document is a detailed rebuttal, likely written by physicist Lawrence Krauss (based on the specific career trajectory and allegations mentioned), addressing two specific complaints of misconduct ('Item 2' and 'Item 6'). The author defends his interactions with a female student at Case Western Reserve University, stating their relationship was professional and mentorship-focused. He also addresses an allegation regarding a 'selfie' taken in November 2016 at an ANU-related event, citing an internal investigation that found the allegations not credible and noting the alleged victim never filed a complaint. The document appears to be part of a larger submission to the House Oversight Committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity