Event Details
January 01, 2008
Description
AAAS Conference attendance.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| College students | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Author's Wife | person | 13 | View Entity |
| Author | person | 163 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021417.jpg
This document is a detailed rebuttal written by a high-profile scientist/professor (identifiable as Lawrence Krauss by context) responding to a list of sexual harassment allegations provided by a reporter or investigator. The author systematically denies or clarifies six specific items, including a 2006 hotel encounter he claims was consensual/platonic, and a 2008 complaint by a student at Case Western Reserve University which he argues was informal and resolved. He also references investigations by ASU and ANU which he claims cleared him of wrongdoing regarding third-party anonymous complaints.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Publication of the book 'Inquest: The Warren Commission and the Establishment of Truth'.
1966-01-01 • New York
Publication of the book 'Agency of Fear'.
1977-01-01 • New York
Publication of the book 'Deception: The Invisible War Between the KGB and the CIA'.
1989-01-01 • New York
Publication of the book 'James Jesus Angleton: Was He Right'.
2011-01-01 • New York
The author and journalist Te-Ping Chen interviewed staff at the Mira hotel regarding Snowden.
2013-06-01 • Mira hotel
Author and Andrew broke up, got back together, and broke up again.
Date unknown • Unknown
A dissenting opinion was issued by the author in the case of J. Picini Flooring, 356 NLRB No. 9.
2010-01-01
The author states 'I visited' but the sentence is cut off, so the location and context of the visit are unknown.
Date unknown • Not specified
A cognitive neuroscience experiment where college students' expectations were manipulated (primed with positive or negative words) before a cognitive task, while their brains were scanned to observe responses to mistakes.
Date unknown • Not specified
A neuroscience experiment was conducted to test how expectations affect reality. College students were 'primed' with positive words (e.g., 'smart', 'clever') or negative words (e.g., 'stupid', 'ignorant') before a cognitive test. Those primed positively performed better. Brain scans showed that when positively-primed students made an error, their prefrontal cortex showed increased activity (a sign of learning), whereas negatively-primed students' brains showed no such response, indicating they expected to fail and did not process the error as a learning opportunity.
Date unknown • Not specified
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event